Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 concha still has not watched the full debate and/or doesn't understand what Schumer proved about the constitutionality of impeachment. But that won't stop him for embarrassing himself over and over again. And lying over and over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 11 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: We're now on the emoji freakout part of concha's stages of grief. Ā Grief?Ā š¤£ I'm nearly in tears laughing at you embarrassing yourself (again). Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, concha said: You literally quoted where I stated "ongoing impeachment", not "impeachment" I've already addressed this. But you don't care about facts. You said something stupid and are now lying about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Ā Andy is FRENETICALLY making a fool out of himself. His one true talent. š¤£ Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Grief?Ā š¤£ Clearly. You do this same stuff all the time. Over and over again. You say something stupid. Then you lie about having said it. Then you start posting "LMAOs" and emojis to cover for having to admit your fault. Because you're a giant pussy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Andy is FRENETICALLY making a fool out of himself. Your ability to say something stupid and then lie about it is unparalleled. It might only be matched by your ability to ignore the facts that refute your lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Ā Andy is mad that he has made a fool of himself. Ā AGAIN. š¤£ Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 5 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: I've already addressed this. But you don't care about facts. You said something stupid and are now lying about it. So if you think that the start date has relevance....how you just toss away any other relevant dates is priceless š©.....as in nobody is buying the hypocrisy š¤ šæ Btw. You are posting all spastic flinching repeatedly again, and appear to be stuck on your famous chorus of ālies all liesā....try and mix it up a bit will ya. Ā Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Rinse, repeat. concha's stages: Say something stupid Lie about it Post emojis to save face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 7 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Rinse, repeat.Anal flinching stages: Be stupid Lie about it call everything and everyone else a liar post pants on fire meme from paid factcheckerĀ blog Fify š šæ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Rinse, repeat. concha's stages: Say something stupid Lie about it Post emojis to save face Ā Post facts Slap around Andy like a hooker late with her moneyĀ Laugh at Andy. AĀ lot. Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 7 hours ago, concha said: Ā Trump is no longer in office and can therefore not be removed from office. The purpose of impeachment is to remove from office. So please explain why this farce continues? Ā Ā To prevent your Orange Father God Treasonous Insurrectionist from running again? I know itās complicated.Ā Ā bgw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 5 hours ago, concha said: Ā No, Andy. You literally quoted where I stated "ongoing impeachment", not "impeachment". š¤” Much bigger āfreak outā emoji for effect.Ā Wow, it actually works.Ā bgw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 concha will not read. Opinion: Yes, ex-presidents can be impeached Their theory ā that impeachment applies only to sitting officials ā is not beyond the pale. But it runs against the weight of scholarship, historical practice and common sense. Many Republicans may be embracing the theory nonetheless because it gives them an excuse to avoid any responsibility: They do not have to condone the former presidentās incitement of the Jan. 6 Capitol invasion, but they also do not have to anger his supporters. Put briefly: They continue to indulge Mr. Trumpās toxic influence on their party. There have been so few impeachments over the course of U.S. history that major issues such as this remain unsettled. But the Congressional Research ServiceĀ notesĀ that the nationās Founders appeared to accept that former officials could be impeached for their conduct in office, as they could be in the British tradition. Decades later, while sitting in the House, former president John Quincy AdamsĀ declared, āI hold myself, so long as I have the breath of life in my body, amenable to impeachment by this House for everything I did during the time I held any public office.ā In 1876, the House impeached former secretary of war William Belknap, who had resigned just before impeachment proceedings could begin. Both the House and Senate debated whether Mr. Belknap could be impeached and tried, and both chambers agreed he could be. The Belknap affair highlights two crucial points. First, it would be illogical if Congress could impeach and punish only sitting officials, because then those officials could simply resign to escape any consequences, such as being barred from serving in federal office again. Officials at the very end of their terms also could engage in flagrant behavior without fear of punishment. Second, absent clear constitutional instructions, Congress itself has wide authority to interpret the boundaries of the impeachment powers vested exclusively in the legislative branch of government. No outside authority has bound senators to a specific, implausible reading of the Constitution. Given that Congress may deem it essential ā now or later ā to bar an individual from federal office, it would be unwise for senators to set a precedent today that would hollow their authority in the future. Senators can and should proceed to the question of whether Mr. Trump should be convicted, and they each should take a stand on the merits. Some might conclude that barring Mr.Ā Trump from office could make him a martyr and do more harm than good. If so, they should be prepared to explain how they would deter future such depredations, with censure being the most obvious, minimally acceptable alternative response to Jan. 6. What they should not do is dodge, weave and try to move along as though nothing happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: concha will not read ...crying chuckĀ has added constitutional scholar to his impressive resume. He doesn't have to read stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, RedZone said: ...crying chuckĀ has added constitutional scholar to his impressive resume. He doesn't have to read stuff. And what's more is he just regurgitated Rand Paul's claim without thinking for two seconds about all the historical facts that refute it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 In the much larger picture. ....the donaldĀ being booted from twitterĀ is impeachment enough for me! That man almost destroyed a country from a social mediaĀ website built for kids and stuff. You know hard that is to do? ...crying chuck never read trump twitter either...so there's that too. In fact..... none of the sheep here ever read trump twitter. I did. So I can call myself a trump twitter expert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 concha's information gathering technique. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 AND, for the record. Twitter'sĀ message was much more powerful thanĀ ryan paul's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Ā A quick google shows there are absolutely no arguments for the unconstitutionality of the current farce. Just whatever Andy posted. š¤” Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 17 minutes ago, concha said: A quick google shows there are absolutely no arguments for the unconstitutionality of the current farce. I agree. š¤·āāļø Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said: I agree. š¤·āāļø Ā Of course you do. You're a leftist fukwit bootlicker. š Ā Ā Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Of course you do. You're a leftist fukwit bootlicker. š Ā concha is very upset at being an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said: concha is very upset at being an idiot. Ā Hey, Andy, based in your latest posting penchant thatĀ debuted yesterday, can we anticipate your next screen name to be "Jizz Guzzler"? "Never Gonna Touch a Va-Jay-Jay" is cumbersome. Ā 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 Just now, concha said: Hey, Andy, based in your latest posting penchant thatĀ debuted yesterday, can we anticipate your next screen name to be "Jizz Guzzler"? "Never Gonna Touch a Va-Jay-Jay" is cumbersome. Yeah, he's definitely angry at being so gullible and so ideologically moronic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.