Jump to content

Emails with Fauci and Francis Collins


badrouter

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Warrior said:

And the coup de grace.

She's back!

This is their doctor.

Doctor Janci Chunn Lindsay.

A doctor of Toxicology.

👇

On 8/10/2021 at 4:19 PM, Atticus Finch said:

Of course, this "doctor" is a complete bozo and is grifting off COVID misinformation.

Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay Makes Misleading Claims About COVID-19 Vaccine

She claims to be the "Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology" at Toxicology Support Services.

What's that?

Well, not much. It's just a company of one: Janci Chunn Lindsay.

She has a website that looks like it was the product of a 9th Grade intro to web design class from circa 2004.

It's no surprise that a moron like @Texasball would endorse such stupidity.

https://www.toxicologysupport.com/

toxicology.thumb.png.f85200470cf626ea2ebdfd8bb676bc30.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warrior said:

And I’ll question the jab as many scientists already do vs listen to some blow hard whose life depends on a HS message board who doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the wall. 

You have to look in the mirror one day, Warrior, and ask yourself this:

Why is every source you provide from Breitbart, the Palmieri Report or some other right-wing hack site?

Why is every doctor you cite a quack, grifter or non-specialist? 

Why does every statistic, chart and graph of actual vaccine efficacy and effectiveness totally debunk your claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badrouter said:

Many observe this and think, “so, if fully vaccinated people are at such severe risk that they are forced to wear face diapers and avoid gatherings, what’s the point of the vaccine?”

This is a strawman.

Public health officials consistently say that you're at much lower risk if you're vaccinated.

Definition and Examples of the Straw Man Fallacy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

This article is just about a group of scientists who have concerns about Israel's vaccine data.

You're on fire!

 

You must have missed this part - 

Earlier this week, the FDA delayed its decision on administration to young people of the Moderna vaccine. Pfizer and Moderna employ the messenger RNA technology, which “teach” cells to make a protein that triggers an immune response rather than inserting a live virus, as do traditional vaccines.

The agency is planning to review the data regarding myocarditis further before making a decision, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Sweden, Finland and Norway have halted the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for younger people, and Iceland has stopped administering the shot to everyone, as WND reported.

Last Friday, France’s health authority advised against using the Moderna vaccine because of the myocarditis risk.

White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said Friday in an MSNBC interviewhe expects a CDC recommendation on whether to approve the Pfizer vaccine for children 5-11 to come the week following the FDA’s Oct. 26 meeting.

The White House said Wednesday on Twitter that in “anticipation of upcoming FDA and CDC independent advisory committee meetings,” President Biden “announced his plan to ensure that if a vaccine is authorized for children ages 5-11, it is quickly and equitably distributed to families across the country.”

A fact sheet said the administration “has procured enough vaccine to support vaccination for the country’s 28 million children ages 5-11 years old.”

Vaccine doesn’t stop the spread
Public health officials and the vaccine makers have shifted from claiming the vaccines stop the spread of COVID-19 to touting their effectiveness at minimizing symptoms.

Pfizer emphasized this week that its smaller dose for children is nearly 91% effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19.

On Friday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson conceded — as has CDC Director Rochelle Walensky — that vaccination does not offer protection from catching COVID and from spreading it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warrior said:

You must have missed this part - 

No, it just has nothing to do with what you said. You posted this article to show scientists opposing the vaccine.

It didn't do that.

Now you're trying to scramble to save face by pasting boilerplate text about the FDA's approval process.

What's more is that this article is from October so we already know how it all turned out.

Hint: not good for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Atticus Finch said:

Your annihilation is an objective fact.

A normal person would be embarrassed by your tomfoolery.

 

Congratulations on Passing 12k posts! That has to make you the board Genius or something- You should ask for a raise for all the time and energy you put in. Your family just be proud. 

 

Your closed minded and limited ability to think outside of your bubble is your limitation. It is impressive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Warrior said:

Congratulations on Passing 12k posts! That has to make you the board Genius or something- You should ask for a raise for all the time and energy you put in. Your family just be proud. 

Your closed minded and limited ability to think outside of your bubble is your limitation. It is impressive. 

You tried to argue on the merits but your arguments were stupid and not supported by reality.

So after realizing this you decided to change directions and talk about post counts, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, On2whls said:

Who said I was anti-vax?  I have the shots.  

This is funny only because of the obvious dishonesty.

👇

On 9/7/2021 at 11:12 PM, On2whls said:

Under family applied duress, I reluctantly signed up for J&J vaccine, but ended up with Moderna (CA bait and switch program).  Got the shot on April 2.  No issues, barely had a sore arm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

You tried to argue on the merits but your arguments were stupid and not supported by reality.

So after realizing this you decided to change directions and talk about post counts, etc.

 

You can't argue with a brick. Some how your position is always the correct one (in your mind) and everyone else is flawed and inaccurate. Your Correct rate is 100% on all Topics! - you are amazing and must be a hoot at parties. 

 I'll leave you with this even though everyone on this board knows it won't have an impact.

The Truth never minds being questioned. A lie always does. 

Enjoy your time being the Board Post King! (think you hit 25 a day!)- wear that Crown with Pride oh ye Little Knowledge yet full of Blindness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is a strawman.

Public health officials consistently say that you're at much lower risk if you're vaccinated.

Definition and Examples of the Straw Man Fallacy

Public health officials said that fully vaccinated people were not safe to celebrate the holidays with others. They’ve said fully vaccinated people are not safe without masks. Many interpret this to mean the vaccine is worthless. Sonya Sotomayor clearly believes the vaccine is worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...