Jump to content

NFL playoffs wins and winning %


HooverOutlaw

Recommended Posts

QB’s get the hot chix and the glamour.  But it’s a team sport and different eras.  All we have is banter Hoover.  
 

Starr was a leader sure.  So was Staubach.  Ranking leaders as QB’s is hard to measure/gauge.
 

 I can use the Phil Simms/Hostetler SB season as an example of a QB doing his job and leading with a heavy running game slant.  Giants didn’t skip a beat when Simms went down and Simms was a leader and tough like Starr was.  

GB was a running juggernaut.  Dallas had it all and Staubach was a stud.  Had Jackie Smith not dropped a sure TD, who knows.  Maybe they sneak that win vs the Steelers.  
 

Hard to believe Lombardi and Landry were once assistant coaches for the Giants together.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

@golfaddict1

QB's get the blame too.  But it doesn't matter because they DO get the hot chix.  

Sometimes a win is dependent on a center being able to play as was the case for the Raiders in their loss to the BUCS.   Don't know if that center had a hot chix or not but I'm not not curious.  😉

Bottom line is, of course, that QB's do get the hot chix and balance in the universe is maintained.   

Btw, who was head coach of Giants when Lombardi and Landry were asst coaches?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, golfaddict1 said:

QB’s get the hot chix and the glamour.  But it’s a team sport and different eras.  All we have is banter Hoover.  
 

Starr was a leader sure.  So was Staubach.  Ranking leaders as QB’s is hard to measure/gauge.
 

 I can use the Phil Simms/Hostetler SB season as an example of a QB doing his job and leading with a heavy running game slant.  Giants didn’t skip a beat when Simms went down and Simms was a leader and tough like Starr was.  

GB was a running juggernaut.  Dallas had it all and Staubach was a stud.  Had Jackie Smith not dropped a sure TD, who knows.  Maybe they sneak that win vs the Steelers.  
 

Hard to believe Lombardi and Landry were once assistant coaches for the Giants together.  

The eagles a few years back as well.  Wentz went down and Foles showed up when they needed him.  

 

TB a couple of years ago didn't play the first 4 games and the pats with Garroppolo and Brissett starting went 3-1. Bobby Brister filled in for Elway and was undefeated

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, World Citizen said:

 

@golfaddict1

QB's get the blame too.  But it doesn't matter because they DO get the hot chix.  

Sometimes a win is dependent on a center being able to play as was the case for the Raiders in their loss to the BUCS.   Don't know if that center had a hot chix or not but I'm not not curious.  😉

Bottom line is, of course, that QB's do get the hot chix and balance in the universe is maintained.   

Btw, who was head coach of Giants when Lombardi and Landry were asst coaches?  

Allie Sherman... pretty cool history regarding Lombardi and Sherman especially.  Two legends as coordinators.  

Indeed, QB's do get blamed for nearly every INT or turnover or 3 and out etc.  It's not tennis folks.  Many moving parts on every play, including receivers running incorrect routes and/or a tip of the hat to simply a great defensive play.  It happens.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, golfaddict1 said:

QB’s get the hot chix and the glamour.  But it’s a team sport and different eras.  All we have is banter Hoover.  
 

Starr was a leader sure.  So was Staubach.  Ranking leaders as QB’s is hard to measure/gauge.
 

 I can use the Phil Simms/Hostetler SB season as an example of a QB doing his job and leading with a heavy running game slant.  Giants didn’t skip a beat when Simms went down and Simms was a leader and tough like Starr was.  

GB was a running juggernaut.  Dallas had it all and Staubach was a stud.  Had Jackie Smith not dropped a sure TD, who knows.  Maybe they sneak that win vs the Steelers.  
 

Hard to believe Lombardi and Landry were once assistant coaches for the Giants together.  

Actually, Simms going down was a blessing for G-men . ,Hostetler's ability to run and get out of the pocket was the reason why the Giants were able to beat the niners . Simms the better pocket passer , but Hoss the better improviser . Against that niner D , a qb had to be somewhat mobile .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CaliNorth said:

Actually, Simms going down was a blessing for G-men . ,Hostetler's ability to run and get out of the pocket was the reason why the Giants were able to beat the niners . Simms the better pocket passer , but Hoss the better improviser . Against that niner D , a qb had to be somewhat mobile .

Do you have to bring up the Roger Craig game 🤮.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...