Columbiafan Posted March 11, 2018 Report Share Posted March 11, 2018 9 hours ago, ECHS05 said: Fucking A... I got all the way to down to Tennessee doing Floridas OOS games... And just had TN, TX and VA left... Which were all 1 games.. And I accidently closed it on my phone, I reopened it hoping itd saved, and It was erased all the way back to Arizona... Florida & Ohio are both gonna have to wait...both were - (negative) though, I know that for sure. Man just use google docs I started doing that for practically anything that i know will require typing for a length of time and it saves almost immediately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2018 Texas: (Single game OOS + or - Out/Under Performance is capped 30 like all the other states... To prevent 1 anomaly game from affecting the #s too drastically) ================= Total Points: +62.8 Total Games: 32 games Avg. PPG OOS Performance: +1.96 ppg ================== (New Mexico accounted for a large portion... apparently, even as lowly ranked as NM is, they are still too high. That and Westlakes 66-7 ass kicking of Niceville...) vs. Arkansas: TX underperformed by -6.4 points in 3 games vs. AR OOS Result: Pleasant Grove TX 27, Arkansas AR 20 ... (TX +7) Team Ratings: Pleasant Grove: 57.5 ; Arkansas: 38.1 ... (TX +19.4) Difference: TX underperformed by -12.4 ... (TX -12.4 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Arkansas AR 7, Texas TX 0 ... (TX -7) Team Ratings: Arkansas: 38.1 ; Texas: 32.7 ... (TX -5.4) Difference: TX underperformed by -1.6 ... (TX -14 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Bishop Dunne TX 34, Fayetteville AR 33 ... (TX +1) Team Ratings: Bishop Dunne: 46.5 ; Fayetteville: 53.1 ... (TX -6.6) Difference: TX outperformed by +7.6 ... (TX -6.4 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Florida: TX outperformed by +30 points in 1 game vs. FL OOS Result: Westlake (Austin) TX 66, Niceville FL 7 ... (TX +59) Team Ratings: Westlake: 61.5 ; Niceville: 36.2 ... (TX +25.3) Difference: TX outperformed by +30 (+33.7)... (TX +30 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Illinois: TX underperformed by -8.6 points in 1 game vs. IL OOS Result: Althoff Christian IL 42, Houston Christian TX 14 ... (TX -28) Team Ratings: Althoff Christian: 21.9 ; Houston Christian: 2.5 ... (TX -19.4) Difference: TX underperformed by -8.6 ... (TX -8.6 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Louisiana: TX underperformed by -2.8 points in 1 game vs. LA OOS Result: Allen TX 28, Evangel Christian Academy LA 7 ... (TX +21) Team Ratings: Allen: 73 ; Evangel Christian: 49.2 ... (TX +23.8) Difference: TX underperformed by -2.8 ... (TX -2.8 ; 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Maryland: TX outperformed by +15.6 points in 1 game vs. MD OOS Result: Sulphur Springs TX 18, Avalon MD 7 ... (TX +11) Team Ratings: Sulphur Springs: 14.7 ; Avalon: 19.3 ... (TX -4.6) Difference: TX outperformed by +15.6 ... (TX +15.6 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. New Mexico: TX outperformed by +39.7 points in 12 games vs. NM OOS Result: Del Valle TX 7, Mayfield NM 0 ... (TX +7) Team Ratings: Del Valle: 26.5 ; Mayfield: 2 ... (TX +24.5) Difference: TX underperformed by -17.5 ... (TX -17.5 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Clint TX 21, Chaparral NM 20 ... (TX +1) Team Ratings: Clint: -0.6 ; Chaparral: -7.7 ... (TX +7.1) Difference: TX underperformed by -7 ... (TX -24.5 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Rio Rancho NM 42, Americas TX 10 ... (TX -32) Team Ratings: Rio Rancho: 30 ; Americas: 0.9 ... (TX -29.1) Difference: TX underperformed by -2.9 ... (TX -27.4 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Bowie (El Paso) TX 40, Silver NM 17 ... (TX +23) Team Ratings: Bowie: -8.8 ; Silver: -18.8 ... (TX +10) Difference: TX outperformed by +13 ... (TX -14.4 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Burges TX 47, Deming NM 26 ... (TX +21) Team Ratings: Burges: 1.7 ; Deming: -7.2 ... (TX +8.9) Difference: TX outperformed by +12.1 ... (TX -2.3 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Clint TX 34, Santa Teresa NM 13 ... (TX +21) Team Ratings: Clint: -0.6 ; Santa Teresa: -12.1 ... (TX +11.5) Difference: TX outperformed by +9.5 ... (TX +7.2 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Gadsden NM 40, San Elizario TX 15 ... (TX -25) Team Ratings: Gadsden: -23.4 ; San Elizario: -48.9 ... (TX -25.5) Difference: TX outperformed by +0.5 ... (TX +7.7 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Santa Teresa NM 21, El Paso Cathedral TX 12 ... (TX -9) Team Ratings: Santa Teresa: -12.1 ; EP Cathedral: -12.4 ... (TX -0.3) Difference: TX underperformed by -8.7 ... (TX -1 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Pampa TX 69, Raton NM 0 ... (TX +69) Team Ratings: Pampa: 10.3 ; Raton: -21 ... (TX +31.3) Difference: TX outperformed by +30 (+38.3) ... (TX +29 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Lubbock Cooper TX 35, Clovis NM 28 ... (TX +7) Team Ratings: Lubbock Cooper: 22.3 ; Clovis: 23.5 ... (TX -1.2) Difference: TX outperformed by +8.2 ... (TX +37.2 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Clint TX 42, Silver NM 8 ... (TX +34) Team Ratings: Clint: -0.6 ; Silver: -18.8 ... (TX +18.2) Difference: TX outperformed by +15.8 ... (TX +53 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Chaparral NM 40, El Paso Cathedral TX 22 ... (TX -18) Team Ratings: Chaparral: -7.7 ; EP Cathedral: -12.4 ... (TX -4.7) Difference: TX underperformed by -13.3 ... (TX +39.7 , 12 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Oklahoma: TX underperformed by -13.6 points in 11 games vs. OK OOS Results: Southlake Carroll TX 21, Broken Arrow OK 14 ... (TX +7) Team Ratings: Southlake Carroll: 55.3 ; Broken Arrow: 42.9 ... (TX +12.4) Difference: TX underperformed by -5.4 ... (TX -5.4 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Union OK 38, Euless Trinity TX 7 ... (TX -31) Team Ratings: Union: 56.5 ; Euless Trinity: 55.6 ... (TX -0.9) Difference: TX underperformed by -30 (-30.1) ... (TX -35.4 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Altus OK 40, Vernon TX 18 ... (TX -22) Team Ratings: Altus: 22.8 ; Vernon: 13 ... (TX -9.8) Difference: TX underperformed by -12.2 ... (TX -47.6 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Frederick OK 31, Electra TX 0 ... (TX -31) Team Ratings: Frederick: -10.9 ; Electra: -19.7 ... (TX -8.8) Difference: TX underperformed by -22.2 ... (TX -69.8 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Sayre OK 29, Claude TX 12 ... (TX -17) Team Ratings: Sayre: -34.4 ; Claude: -32.8 ... (TX +1.6) Difference: TX underperformed by -18.6 ... (TX -88.4 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Gruver TX 48, Texhoma OK 7 ... (TX +41) Team Ratings: Gruver: 6.4 ; Texhoma: -21.3 ... (TX +27.7) Difference: TX outperformed by +13.3 ... (TX -75.1 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Tascosa TX 65, MacArthur OK 21 ... (TX +44) Team Ratings: Tascosa: 30.4 ; MacArthur: 17.4 ... (TX +13) Difference: TX outperformed by +30 (+31) ... (TX -45.1 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Booker TX 48, Beaver OK 19 ... (TX +29) Team Ratings: Booker: -34.4 ; Beaver: -52.2 ... (TX +17.8) Difference: TX outperformed by +11.2 ... (TX -33.9 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Stratford TX 74, Guymon OK 0 ... (TX +74) Team Ratings: Stratford: 33.5 ; Guymon: -23.1 ... (TX +56.6) Difference: TX outperformed by +17.4 ... (TX -16.5 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Wellington TX 42, Hollis OK 0 ... (TX +42) Team Ratings: Wellington: 28.3 ; Hollis: -30.2 ... (TX +58.5) Difference: TX underperformed by -16.5 ... (TX -33 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Spearman TX 52, Texhoma OK 12 ... (TX +40) Team Ratings: Spearman: -0.7 ; Texhoma: -21.3 ... (TX +20.6) Difference: TX outperformed by +19.4 ... (TX -13.6 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Tennessee: TX outperformed by +8.9 points in 2 games vs. TN OOS Results: Brentwood Academy TN 21, Bishop Dunne TX 14 ... (TX -7) Team Ratings: Brentwood Academy: 64.7 ; Bishop Dunne: 46.5 ... (TX -18.2) Difference: TX outperformed by +11.2 ... (TX +11.2 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Union City TN 42, Poth TX 21 ... (TX -21) Team Ratings: Union City: 23.9 ; Poth: 5.2 ... (TX -18.7) Difference: TX underperformed by -2.3 ... (TX +8.9 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TX +8.9 , 2 games TX -13.6 , 11 games TX +39.7 , 12 games TX +15.6 , 1 game TX -2.8 ; 1 game TX -8.6 , 1 game TX +30 , 1 game TX -6.4 , 3 games +62.8 , 32 games = +1.96 ppg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted March 11, 2018 Report Share Posted March 11, 2018 @ECHS05 Are the team ratings in a matchup given any effect by whether a team is home or away? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2018 12 minutes ago, Columbiafan said: @ECHS05 Are the team ratings in a matchup given any effect by whether a team is home or away? No. Theres no way to quantify that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2018 Totals now: Arizona: +3.74 Georgia: +2.68 Texas: +1.96 Arkansas: -2.92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2018 Going to do SoCal & NorCal seperate now.... I can easily put them together afterwards to get California as a whole... Its just that SoCal & NorCal are very different in their OOS game ventures.... Honesly all Sections should be done individually, but getting NorCal & SoCal seperate is enough... California: SoCal & NorCal seperated SoCal Sections: Los Angeles, Southern, San Diego, Central D3, 4, & 5 NorCal Sections: Northern, North Coast, Sac-Joaquin, San Francisco, Oakland, Central Coast, Central D1, 2, & 6 ============ ****SoCals Numbers**** Total Points: -40.2 Total Games: 41 Overall Avg. PPG Performance: -0.98 ============ ****NorCals Numbers**** Total Points: -133.3 Total Games: 42 Overall Avg. PPG Performance: -3.174 ==================== Combined Avg. PPG Performance: -2.09 ==================== SoCal: vs. Arizona: SoCal underperformed by -12.5 points in 14 games vs. AZ OOS Results: Central (El Centro) CA 34, Kofa AZ 14 ... (SoCal +20) Team Ratings: Central (El Centro): 12.6 ; Kofa: -22.4 ... (SoCal +35) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -15 ... (SoCal -15 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Imperial CA 55, Cibola AZ 14 ... (SoCal +41) Team Ratings: Imperial: 7.4 ; Cibola: -6.8 ... (SoCal +14.2) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +26.8 ... (SoCal +11.8 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Chaminade CA 39, Mountain Pointe AZ 25 ... (SoCal +14) Team Ratings: Chaminade: 63.6 ; Mountain Pointe: 46.4 ... (SoCal +17.2) Difference: CA underperformed by -3.2 ... (SoCal +8.6 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Central (El Centro) CA 33, Gila Ridge AZ 21 ... (SoCal +12) Team Ratings: Central (El Centro): 12.6 ; Gila Ridge: -16.2 ... (SoCal +28.8) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -16.8 ... (SoCal -8.2 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Southwest (El Centro) CA 41, Cibola AZ 0 ... (SoCal +41) Team Ratings: Southwest (El Centro): 35.8 ; Cibola: -6.8 ... (SoCal +42.6) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -1.6 ... (SoCal -9.8 ; 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Yuma AZ 14, Calexico CA 12 ... (SoCal -2) Team Ratings: Yuma: -27.3 ; Calexico: -30.5 ... (SoCal -3.2) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +1.2 ... (SoCal -8.6 ; 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Yuma Catholic AZ 37, Imperial CA 34 ... (SoCal -3) Team Ratings: Yuma Catholic: 12.9 ; Imperial: 7.4 ... (SoCal -5.5) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +2.5 ... (SoCal -6.1 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Southwest (El Centro) CA 56, Kofa AZ 7 ... (SoCal +49) Team Ratings: Southwest (El Centro): 35.8 ; Kofa: -22.4 ... (SoCal +58.2) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -9.2 ... (SoCal -15.3 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Valencia CA 56, Chaparral AZ 14 ... (SoCal +42) Team Ratings: Valencia: 59.9 ; Chaparral: 27.4 ... (SoCal +32.5) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +9.5 ... (SoCal -5.8 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Casteel AZ 28, Monte Vista (Spring Valley) CA 21... (SoCal -7) Team Ratings: Casteel: 32.7 ; Monte Vista: 17.5 ... (SoCal -15.2) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +8.2 ... (SoCal +2.4 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Southwest (El Centro) CA 50, Yuma AZ 0 ... (SoCal +50) Team Ratings: Southwest (El Centro): 35.8 ; Yuma: -27.3 ... (SoCal +63.1) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -13.1 ... (SoCal -10.7 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Notre Dame Prep AZ 48, La Salle 17 ... (SoCal -31) Team Ratings: Notre Dame Prep: 38.4 ; La Salle: 5.7 ... (SoCal -32.7) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +1.7 ... (SoCal -9 , 12 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Southwest (El Centro) CA 30, Gila Ridge AZ 0 ... (SoCal +30) Team Ratings: Southwest (El Centro): 35.8 , Gila Ridge: -16.2 ... (SoCal +52) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -22 ... (SoCal -31 , 13 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Result: Holtville CA 40, Antelope AZ 0 ... (SoCal +40) Team Ratings: Holtville: -23.6 ; Antelope: -45.1 ... (SoCal +21.5) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +18.5 ... (SoCal -12.5 , 14 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Colorado: SoCal outperformed by +5 points in 1 game vs. CO OOS Results: Ralston Valley CO 35, East Bakersfield CA 14 ... (SoCal -21) Team Ratings: Ralston Valley: 18.7 ; East Bakersfield: -7.3 ... (SoCal -26) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +5 ... (SoCal +5 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. D.C.: SoCal underperformed by -12 points in 1 game vs. D.C. OOS Results: St. John Bosco: 21, St. John's DC 17 ... (SoCal +4) Team Ratings: St. John Bosco: 81 ; St. John's: 65 ... (SoCal +16) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -12 ... (SoCal -12 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Florida: SoCal underperformed by -27 points in 3 games vs. FL OOS Results: Crescenta Valley CA 34, Barron Collier FL 31 ... (SoCal +3) Team Ratings: Crescenta Valley: 14.5 ; Baron Collier: 21.4 ... (SoCal -6.9) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +9.9 ... (SoCal +9.9 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Poinciana FL 28, Whittier Christian CA 20 ... (SoCal -8) Team Ratings: Poinciana: -15.8 ; Whittier Christian: -16.9 ... (SoCal -1.1) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -6.9 ... (SoCal +3 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: St. Thomas Aquinas FL 9, St. John Bosco CA 3 ... (SoCal -6) Team Ratings: St. Thomas Aquinas: 55.3 ; St. John Bosco: 81 ... (SoCal +25.7) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -30 (-31.7) ... (SoCal -27 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Georgia: SoCal underperformed by -1.5 points in 1 game vs. GA OOS Results: Colquitt Co. GA 26, Vista Murrieta CA 7 ... (SoCal -19) Team Ratings: Colquitt Co.: 63 ; Vista Murrieta: 45.5 ... (SoCal -17.5) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -1.5 ... (SoCal -1.5 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Hawaii: SoCal underperformed by -52 points in 8 games vs. HI OOS Results: St. Margaret's CA 34, Kealakehe HI 14 ... (SoCal +20) Team Ratings: St. Margaret's: 27.3 ; Kealakehe: 3.9 ... (SoCal +23.4) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -3.4 ... (SoCal -3.4 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Villa Park CA 14, Damien HI 6 ... (SoCal +8) Team Ratings: Villa Park: 31.2 ; Damien: 21.7 ... (SoCal +9.5) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -1.5 ... (SoCal -4.9 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Mission Viejo CA 39, Baldwin HI 14 ... (SoCal +25) Team Ratings: Mission Viejo: 70.4 ; Baldwin: 8.8 ... (SoCal +61.6) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -30 (-36.6) ... (SoCal -34.9 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Kamehameha HI 33, Carson CA 10 ... (SoCal -23) Team Ratings: Kamehameha: 51.6 ; Carson: 25.9 ... (SoCal -25.7) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +2.7 ... (SoCal -32.2 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Punahou HI 23, Torrey Pines CA 7 ... (SoCal -16) Team Ratings: Punahou: 55.3 ; Torrey Pines: 47.5 ... (SoCal -7.8) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -8.2 ... (SoCal -40.4 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Valley Center CA 34, Kamehameha Maui HI 10 ... (SoCal +24) Team Ratings: Valley Center: 28.8 ; Kamehameha Maui: -2.2 ... (SoCal +31) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -7 ... (SoCal -47.4 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Punahou HI 56, Serra (Gardena) CA 42 ... (SoCal - 14) Team Ratings: Punahou: 55.3 ; Serra (Gardena): 52.6 ... (SoCal -2.7) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -11.3 ... (SoCal -58.7 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: St. Louis HI 56, Narbonne CA 50 ... (SoCal -6) Team Ratings: St. Louis: 77.3 ; Narbonne: 64.6 ... (SoCal -12.7) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +6.7 ... (SoCal -52 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Illinois: SoCal underperformed by -4.2 points in 1 game vs. IL OOS Results: Loyola Academy IL 13, Bishop Amat CA 6 ... (SoCal -7) Team Ratings: Loyola Academy: 55.4 ; Bishop Amat: 52.6 ... (SoCal -2.8) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -4.2 ... (SoCal -4.2 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. New Jersey: SoCal outperformed by +20.7 points in 1 game vs. NJ OOS Results: Mater Dei CA 62, Bergen Catholic NJ 14 ... (SoCal +48) Team Ratings: Mater Dei: 97 ; Bergen Catholic: 69.7 ... (SoCal +27.3) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +20.7 ... (SoCal +20.7 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Nevada: SoCal outperformed by +7.2 points in 6 games vs. NV OOS Results: Bishop CA 29, Yerington NV 12 ... (SoCal +17) Team Ratings: Bishop: -16.6 ; Yerington: -22.7 ... (SoCal +6.1) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +10.9 ... (SoCal +10.9 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bishop Diego CA 9, Desert Pines NV 0 ... (SoCal +9) Team Ratings: Bishop Diego: 53.1 ; Desert Pines: 37.9 ... (SoCal +15.2) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -6.2 ... (SoCal +4.7 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Green Valley NV 42, El Toro CA 35 ... (SoCal -7) Team Ratings: Green Valley: 34, El Toro: 33.7 ... (SoCal -0.3) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -6.7 ... (SoCal -2 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Mater Dei CA 35, Bishop Gorman NV 21 ... (SoCal +14) Team Ratings: Mater Dei: 97 ; Bishop Gorman: 72.5 ... (SoCal. +24.5) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -10.5 ... (SoCal -12.5 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: John Muir CA 48, Desert Oasis NV 0 ... (SoCal +48) Team Ratings: John Muir: 5.2 ; Desert Oasis: -21.7 ... (SoCal +26.9) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +21.1 ... (SoCal +8.6 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bonanza NV 19, Mar Vista CA 14 ... (SoCal -5) Team Ratings: Bonanza: -5.3 ; Mar Vista: -8.9 ... (SoCal -3.6) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -1.4 ... (SoCal +7.2 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Utah: SoCal outperformed by +36.1 points in 5 games vs. UT OOS Results: Christian (El Cajon) CA 60, Hurricane UT 38 ... (SoCal +22) Team Ratings: Christian: 15.3 ; Hurricane: 3.1 ... (SoCal +12.2) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +9.8 ... (SoCal +9.8 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Helix CA 35, Herriman UT 0 ... (SoCal +35) Team Ratings: Helix: 65.8 ; Herriman: 44.4 ... (SoCal +21.4) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +13.6 ... (SoCal +23.4 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Mission Hills CA 42, Desert Hills UT 7 ... (SoCal +35) Team Ratings: Mission Hills: 58.9 ; Desert Hills: 31.4 ... (SoCal +27.5) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +7.5 ... (SoCal +30.9 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Servite CA 38, American Fork UT 28 ... (SoCal +10) Team Ratings: Servite: 56.4 ; American Fork: 45.3 ... (SoCal +11.1) Difference: SoCal underperformed by -1.1 ... (SoCal +29.8 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Madison (San Diego) CA 24, Dixie UT 14 ... (SoCal +10) Team Ratings: Madison: 43.7 ; Dixie: 40 ... (SoCal +3.7) Difference: SoCal outperformed by +6.3 ... (SoCal +36.1 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12.5 , 14 games +5 , 1 game -12 , 1 game -27 , 3 games -1.5 , 1 game -52 , 8 games -4.2 , 1 game +20.7 , 1 game +7.2 , 6 games +36.1 , 5 games Total Points: -40.2 Total Games: 41 Avg. PPG Performance: -0.98 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = NorCal: vs. Alaska: NorCal outperformed by +26.7 points in 2 games vs. AK OOS Results: Capital Christian CA 43, Service AK 14 ... (NorCal +29) Team Ratings: Capital Christian: 10.6 ; Service: -9.4 ... (NorCal +20) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +9 ... (NorCal +9 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Pleasant Valley CA 41, Bartlett AK 26 ... (NorCal +15) Team Ratings: Pleasant Valley: 11.9 ; Bartlett: 14.6 ... (NorCal -2.7) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +17.7 ... (NorCal +26.7 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. D.C.: NorCal underperformed by -1.9 points in 1 game vs. D.C. OOS Results: De La Salle CA 35, St. John's DC 31 ... (NorCal +4) Team Ratings: De La Salle: 70.9 ; St. John's: 65 ... (NorCal +5.9) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -1.9 ... (NorCal -1.9 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Florida: NorCal underperformed by -12.5 points in 1 game vs. FL OOS Results: Acalanes CA 21, Suncoast FL 14 ... (NorCal +7) Team Ratings: Acalanes: 30.2 ; Suncoast: 10.7 ... (NorCal +19.5) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -12.5 ... (NorCal -12.5 ; 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Hawaii: NorCal underperformed by -8.4 points in 1 game vs. HI OOS Results: Mililani HI 49, Clayton Valley CA 30 ... (NorCal -19) Team Ratings: Mililani: 53, Clayton Valley: 42.4 ... (NorCal -10.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -8.4 ... (NorCal -8.4 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Idaho: NorCal outperformed by +6.5 points in 2 games vs. ID OOS Results: Folsom CA 56, Coeur d'Alene ID 33 ... (NorCal +23) Team Ratings: Folsom: 73.9 ; Coeur d'Alene: 53 ... (NorCal +20.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +2.1 ... (NorCal +2.1 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Coeur d'Alene ID 45, Capital Christian CA 7 ... (NorCal -38) Team Ratings: Coeur d'Alene: 53 ; Capital Christian: 10.6 ... (NorCal -42.4) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +4.4 ... (NorCal +6.5 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Nevada: NorCal underperformed by -89 points in 18 games vs. NV OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 46, Northgate CA 16 ... (NorCal -30) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Northgate: 5.8 ... (NorCal -36.7) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +6.7 ... (NorCal +6.7 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: McQueen NV 38, Lassen CA 14 ... (NorCal -24) Team Ratings: McQueen: 14.9 ; Lassen: -7.1 ... (NorCal -22) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2 ... (NorCal +4.7 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reed NV 38, Clayton Valley CA 22 ... (NorCal -16) Team Ratings: Reed: 48 ; Clayton Valley: 42.4 ... (NorCal -5.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -10.4 ... (NorCal -5.7 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reno NV 44, Stagg CA 7 ... (NorCal -37) Team Ratings: Reno: 45.6 ; Stagg: 10 ... (NorCal -35.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -1.4 ... (NorCal -7.1 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Rosemont CA 33, Wooster NV 20 ... (NorCal +13) Team Ratings: Rosemont: -13.5 ; Wooster: -26.8 ... (NorCal +13.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -0.3 ... (NorCal -7.4 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Sacred Heart Cathedral CA 35, Fernley NV 26 ... (NorCal +9) Team Ratings: Sacred Heart Cathedral: 18.4 ; Fernley: 8.2 ... (NorCal +10.2) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -1.2 ... (NorCal -8.6 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 27, Edison (Fresno) CA 26 ... (NorCal -1) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Edison: 28.8 ... (NorCal -13.7) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +12.7 ... (NorCal +4.1 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Spanish Springs NV 42, Foothill (Palo Cedro) CA 7 ... (NorCal -35) Team Ratings: Spanish Springs: 22.4 ; Foothill: 7.2 ... (NorCal -15.2) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -19.8 ... (NorCal -15.7 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bear River CA 31, Pershing Co. NV 10 ... (NorCal +21) Team Ratings: Bear River: 21.9 ; Pershing Co.: 5.6 ... (NorCal +16.3) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +4.7 ... (NorCal -11 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Clayton Valley CA 22, Canyon Springs NV 14 ... (NorCal +8) Team Ratings: Clayton Valley: 42.4 ; Canyon Springs: 19.5 ... (NorCal +22.9) Difference: NorCal underperforms by -14.9 ... (NorCal -25.9 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reno NV 28, Sheldon CA 21 ... (NorCal -7) Team Ratings: Reno: 45.6 ; Sheldon: 40.9 ... (NorCal -4.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2.3 ... (NorCal -28.8 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Yerington NV 47, Sierra Ridge/RoP CA 0 (NorCal -47) Team Ratings: Yerington: -22.7 ; Sierra Ridge: -66 ... (NorCal -43.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -3.7 ... (NorCal -32.5 ; 12 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Oak Ridge CA 24, Reed NV 21 ... (NorCal +3) Team Ratings: Oak Ridge: 53.7 ; Reed: 48 ... (NorCal +5.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2.7 ... (NorCal -35.2 , 13 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Pershing Co. NV 40, Chester CA 28 ... (NorCal -12) Team Ratings: Pershing Co.: 5.6 ; Chester: 1.5 ... (NorCal -4.1) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -7.9 ... (NorCal -43.1 , 14 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bishop Gorman NV 34, De La Salle CA 7 ... (NorCal -27) Team Ratings: Bishop Gorman: 72.5 ; De La Salle: 70.9 ... (NorCal -1.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -25.4 ... (NorCal -68.5 , 15 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Foresthill CA 22, Incline NV 14 ... (NorCal +8) Team Ratings: Foresthill: -56.6 ; Incline: -59.5 ... (NorCal +2.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +5.1 ... (NorCal -63.4 , 16 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 55, Shasta CA 41 ... (NorCal -14) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Shasta: 39 ... (NorCal -3.5) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -10.5 ... (NorCal -73.9 , 17 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bishop Manogue NV 40, Capital Christian CA 13 ... (NorCal -27) Team Ratings: Bishop Manogue: 22.5 ; Capital Christian: 10.6 ... (NorCal -11.9) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -15.1 ... (NorCal -89 , 18 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Oregon: NorCal underperformed by -28 points in 12 games vs. OR OOS Results: Fortuna CA 34, North Medford OR 21 ... (NorCal +13) Team Ratings: Fortuna: 30.4 ; North Medford: 0.7 ... (NorCal +29.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -16.7 ... (NorCal -16.7 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Cascade Christian OR 34, Yreka CA 7 ... (NorCal - 27) Team Ratings: Cascade Christian: 23.2 ; Yreka: -8.9 ... (NorCal -32.1) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +5.1 ... (NorCal -11.6 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: La Salle OR 20, St. Francis (Watsonville) CA 7 ... (NorCal -13) Team Ratings: La Salle: -6.6 ; St. Francis: -13.4 ... (NorCal -6.8) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -6.2 ... (NorCal -17.8 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Mazama OR 32, Del Norte CA 0 ... (NorCal -32) Team Ratings: Mazama: 19 ; Del Norte: -13.9 ... (NorCal -32.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +0.9 ... (NorCal -16.9 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Modoc CA 13, Lost River OR 0 ... (NorCal +13) Team Ratings: Modoc: -17 ; Lost River: -21.6 ... (NorCal +4.6) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +8.4 ... (NorCal -8.5 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Shasta CA 69, North Medford OR 39 ... (NorCal +30) Team Ratings: Shasta: 39 ; North Medford: 0.7 ... (NorCal +38.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -8.3 ... (NorCal -16.8 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Henley OR 22, Yreka CA 20 ... (NorCal -2) Team Ratings: Henley: 2.1 ; Yreka: -8.9 ... (NorCal -11) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +9 ... (NorCal -7.8 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Klamath Union OR 27, Mt. Shasta CA 14 ... (NorCal -13) Team Ratings: Klamath Union: -18.5 ; Mt. Shasta: -32 ... (NorCal -13.5) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +0.5 ... (NorCal -7.3 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Cascade Christian OR 49, Paradise CA 42 ... (NorCal -7) Team Ratings: Cascade Christian: 23.2 ; Paradise: -2.2 ... (NorCal -25.4) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +18.4 ... (NorCal +11.1 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Lakeview OR 33, Modoc CA 0 ... (NorCal -33) Team Ratings: Lakeview: -18.3 ; Modoc: -17 ... (NorCal +1.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -30 (-34.3) ... (NorCal -18.9 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: North Bend OR 43, Arcata CA 14 ... (NorCal -29) Team Ratings: North Bend: -11.9 ; Arcata: -12.7 ... (NorCal -0.8) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -28.2 ... (NorCal -47.1 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Fall River CA 56, Lakeview OR 28 ... (NorCal +28) Team Ratings: Fall River: -9.4 ; Lakeview: -18.3 ... (NorCal +8.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +19.1 ... (NorCal -28 , 12 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Utah: NorCal underperformed by -29.6 in 4 games vs. UT OOS Results: Orem UT 34, Sutter CA 18 ... (NorCal -16) Team Ratings: Orem: 55.1 ; Sutter: 33.5 ... (NorCal -21.6) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +5.6 ... (NorCal +5.6 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Orem UT 63, Bakersfield CA 28 ... (NorCal -35) Team Ratings: Orem: 55.1 ; Bakersfield: 35.8 ... (NorCal -19.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -15.7 ... (NorCal -10.1 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Timpview UT 30, Del Oro CA 13 ... (NorCal -17) Team Ratings: Timpview: 42.9 ; Del Oro: 42.1 ... (NorCal -0.8 Difference: NorCal underperformed by -16.2 ... (NorCal -26.3 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Layton Christian UT 27, San Lorenzo Valley CA 14 ... (NorCal -13) Team Ratings: Layton Christian: -4.8 ; San Lorenzo Valley: -14.5 ... (NorCal -9.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -3.3 ... (NorCal -29.6 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Washington: NorCal outperformed by +2.9 points in 1 game vs. WA OOS Results: Gonzaga Prep WA 38, Bellarmine CA 19 ... (NorCal -19) Team Ratings: Gonzaga Prep: 43.8 ; Bellarmine: 21.9 ... (NorCal -21.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +2.9 ... (NorCal +2.9 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +26.7 , 2 games -1.9 , 1 game -12.5 ; 1 game -8.4 , 1 game +6.5 , 2 games -89 , 18 games -28 , 12 games -29.6 , 4 games +2.9 , 1 game NorCal: Total Points: -133.3 Total Games: 42 Avg. PPG Performance: -3.174 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2018 Totals now: Arizona: +3.74 Georgia: +2.68 Texas: +1.96 SoCal: -0.98 Arkansas: -2.92 NorCal: -3.17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted March 17, 2018 Report Share Posted March 17, 2018 If the scaling doesn't take any impact off who is home and away then it's obviously not going to be exact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2018 55 minutes ago, Columbiafan said: If the scaling doesn't take any impact off who is home and away then it's obviously not going to be exact Again, this is irrelevant. And even if it was not, theres no way to quantify that. All states are being done by the same rules. Some states may play more home OOS games than others and some may play away more than others... But it isnt going to make a noticeable difference... Itll all cancel out. Im doing it precisely the way Ned would at CP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ararar Posted March 17, 2018 Report Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, ECHS05 said: Again, this is irrelevant. And even if it was not, theres no way to quantify that. All states are being done by the same rules. Some states may play more home OOS games than others and some may play away more than others... But it isnt going to make a noticeable difference... Itll all cancel out. Im doing it precisely the way Ned would at CP. True but there still is the question if Ned adds GISA into the overall GA ratings.I would suspect he does since it is GA football.Maybe you should do them as well might even help your state Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2018 A good example of how it works..... "SoCal Team A" played 12 total games, 11 of the games were vs. other SoCal teams and the other 1 was vs. a Utah team. "Utah Team A" played 12 total games also, 11 of the games were vs. other Utah teams and the other 1 was vs. a SoCal team. Well the SoCal team will be scaled mostly to SoCal, and the Utah team will be scaled most to Utah teams... Because thats what happens over time, your rating becomes your scale compared to the teams youve played. Obviously if the SoCal team played more Utah teams theyve begin to be scaled more and more to Utah... But thats not the case, we have to work with limited data, in this case being 1 game. Back to the example ... So "SoCal Team A" defeated "Utah Team A" 35-21, by 14 points... So if thats accurate, "SoCal Team A" should be rated more or less 14 points higher than "Utah Team A" because thats how ratings work at CP. Now looking at each teams rating after the season is over, "SoCal Team A" has a rating of , lets say, 59... While "Utah Team A" has a rating of 32... So... "SoCal Team A" only won the actual game by 14, but has a rating 27 points higher than the Utah team.... Heres where the scaling comes in ---- what this suggests is, either the teams "SoCal Team A" were playing in SoCal were overvalued/overscaled allowing "SoCal Team A"s rating to be higher than it should be... Or "Utah Team A"s opponents in Utah were undervalued, and should be scaled higher on average. Now thats a hard comparison to draw using just 1 game and 2 teams, so thats why I use every team and every OOS game. But... NorCal and SoCal are easy to seperate because they dont play each other a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2018 16 hours ago, Ararar said: True but there still is the question if Ned adds GISA into the overall GA ratings.I would suspect he does since it is GA football.Maybe you should do them as well might even help your state Dude... That does not matter AT ALL. What Im finding is the GHSAs scale compared to everyone else... Because those are the teams Im using. It doesnt matter what Ned does. The reality is, GHSA teams (1A-7A) are underscaled/undervalued by 2.68 points per team on average... According to their ratings compared to actual OOS results. What Ned does with the GISA is irrelevant, I dont know why you keep on and keep on saying that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2018 16 hours ago, Ararar said: True but there still is the question if Ned adds GISA into the overall GA ratings.I would suspect he does since it is GA football.Maybe you should do them as well might even help your state Like Im doing with GA... Im not adding the little independent league teams into ANY states totals. They are all being done the same... If you click on California 11-man State rankings... Youll find teams like Needles, who are mixed with CA and are in CA but have a Nevada tag aka league. I did NOT add them in CAs total. But that isnt going to change anything... Because according to the data, using actual SoCal teams from the San Diego, Southern, and Los Angeles leagues (plus Central D3, 4, and 5) , SoCal underperformed by an average of -0.98 points per game/team in relation to their ratings. Those teams from those leagues did that, thats it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ararar Posted March 18, 2018 Report Share Posted March 18, 2018 1 hour ago, ECHS05 said: Dude... That does not matter AT ALL. What Im finding is the GHSAs scale compared to everyone else... Because those are the teams Im using. It doesnt matter what Ned does. The reality is, GHSA teams (1A-7A) are underscaled/undervalued by 2.68 points per team on average... According to their ratings compared to actual OOS results. What Ned does with the GISA is irrelevant, I dont know why you keep on and keep on saying that. I'm not arguing what you're doing just how it actually pertains to what CP does.I seriously doubt they exclude team , league's or associations in data determining state scaling.Carry on Pythagoras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ararar Posted March 18, 2018 Report Share Posted March 18, 2018 2 minutes ago, Ararar said: Nvm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 24, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2018 About to do New Jersey... Totals so far: Arizona: +3.74 Georgia: +2.68 Texas: +1.96 SoCal: -0.98 Arkansas: -2.92 NorCal: -3.17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las Vegas_JC Posted March 24, 2018 Report Share Posted March 24, 2018 On 3/17/2018 at 1:36 PM, ECHS05 said: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vs. Nevada: NorCal underperformed by -89 points in 18 games vs. NV OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 46, Northgate CA 16 ... (NorCal -30) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Northgate: 5.8 ... (NorCal -36.7) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +6.7 ... (NorCal +6.7 , 1 game) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: McQueen NV 38, Lassen CA 14 ... (NorCal -24) Team Ratings: McQueen: 14.9 ; Lassen: -7.1 ... (NorCal -22) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2 ... (NorCal +4.7 , 2 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reed NV 38, Clayton Valley CA 22 ... (NorCal -16) Team Ratings: Reed: 48 ; Clayton Valley: 42.4 ... (NorCal -5.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -10.4 ... (NorCal -5.7 , 3 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reno NV 44, Stagg CA 7 ... (NorCal -37) Team Ratings: Reno: 45.6 ; Stagg: 10 ... (NorCal -35.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -1.4 ... (NorCal -7.1 , 4 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Rosemont CA 33, Wooster NV 20 ... (NorCal +13) Team Ratings: Rosemont: -13.5 ; Wooster: -26.8 ... (NorCal +13.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -0.3 ... (NorCal -7.4 , 5 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Sacred Heart Cathedral CA 35, Fernley NV 26 ... (NorCal +9) Team Ratings: Sacred Heart Cathedral: 18.4 ; Fernley: 8.2 ... (NorCal +10.2) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -1.2 ... (NorCal -8.6 , 6 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 27, Edison (Fresno) CA 26 ... (NorCal -1) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Edison: 28.8 ... (NorCal -13.7) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +12.7 ... (NorCal +4.1 , 7 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Spanish Springs NV 42, Foothill (Palo Cedro) CA 7 ... (NorCal -35) Team Ratings: Spanish Springs: 22.4 ; Foothill: 7.2 ... (NorCal -15.2) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -19.8 ... (NorCal -15.7 , 8 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bear River CA 31, Pershing Co. NV 10 ... (NorCal +21) Team Ratings: Bear River: 21.9 ; Pershing Co.: 5.6 ... (NorCal +16.3) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +4.7 ... (NorCal -11 , 9 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Clayton Valley CA 22, Canyon Springs NV 14 ... (NorCal +8) Team Ratings: Clayton Valley: 42.4 ; Canyon Springs: 19.5 ... (NorCal +22.9) Difference: NorCal underperforms by -14.9 ... (NorCal -25.9 , 10 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Reno NV 28, Sheldon CA 21 ... (NorCal -7) Team Ratings: Reno: 45.6 ; Sheldon: 40.9 ... (NorCal -4.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2.3 ... (NorCal -28.8 , 11 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Yerington NV 47, Sierra Ridge/RoP CA 0 (NorCal -47) Team Ratings: Yerington: -22.7 ; Sierra Ridge: -66 ... (NorCal -43.3) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -3.7 ... (NorCal -32.5 ; 12 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Oak Ridge CA 24, Reed NV 21 ... (NorCal +3) Team Ratings: Oak Ridge: 53.7 ; Reed: 48 ... (NorCal +5.7) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -2.7 ... (NorCal -35.2 , 13 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Pershing Co. NV 40, Chester CA 28 ... (NorCal -12) Team Ratings: Pershing Co.: 5.6 ; Chester: 1.5 ... (NorCal -4.1) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -7.9 ... (NorCal -43.1 , 14 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bishop Gorman NV 34, De La Salle CA 7 ... (NorCal -27) Team Ratings: Bishop Gorman: 72.5 ; De La Salle: 70.9 ... (NorCal -1.6) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -25.4 ... (NorCal -68.5 , 15 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Foresthill CA 22, Incline NV 14 ... (NorCal +8) Team Ratings: Foresthill: -56.6 ; Incline: -59.5 ... (NorCal +2.9) Difference: NorCal outperformed by +5.1 ... (NorCal -63.4 , 16 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Damonte Ranch NV 55, Shasta CA 41 ... (NorCal -14) Team Ratings: Damonte Ranch: 42.5 ; Shasta: 39 ... (NorCal -3.5) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -10.5 ... (NorCal -73.9 , 17 games) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OOS Results: Bishop Manogue NV 40, Capital Christian CA 13 ... (NorCal -27) Team Ratings: Bishop Manogue: 22.5 ; Capital Christian: 10.6 ... (NorCal -11.9) Difference: NorCal underperformed by -15.1 ... (NorCal -89 , 18 games) According to your data Northern NV > NorCal. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECHS05 Posted March 24, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2018 20 minutes ago, Las Vegas_JC said: According to your data Northern NV > NorCal. Thanks! Really that just means NorCal is overscaled/overrated at CalPreps in comparison to NV teams... Not that NV is better... But I get it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.