HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, Blueliner said: At least some serious prison time for that Asshole. No a hanging. I wont be satisfied until people hang. Just like after lincoln they rounded the people up and hung 5 at a time. We have coconspirators against trump. Many of them. Time to hang 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 From NPR Can Trump Legally Out The Whistleblower? Experts Say It Would Not Violate Any Laws https://www.npr.org/2019/11/06/776481504/can-trump-legally-out-the-whistleblower-experts-say-it-would-not-violate-any-law Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 Ian Cameron abc news producer who was part of shutting down the Epstein story is married to Susan Rice yes that Susan Rice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15yds4gibberish Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 15 hours ago, Bormio said: Quid pro schmo. What people are missing is that everyone’s mind is made up - this has been going on for 3 years. Just as nothing that Clinton had done was going to lead Democrats to convict him, the same is true of the GOP. What the Democrats are getting all huffy about now is simply not going to change minds. Sure, there will be groaning and moaning by some GOP Senators- but they will not remove Trump. Democrats can get all hot and bothered- but it will not matter. The election is going to decide - so you Dems better choose wisely. 2 hours ago, Bormio said: See the Clinton impeachment While I think there is no qualitative equivalence between Clinton lying about a blow job in the oval office while under oath, and Trump withholding military aid to pressure another nation to dig up dirt on a likely political opponent and then his staff trying to cover it up, removal from office after impeachment is indeed a very high bar that has never been cleared in American history. You are in good company with your argument. In Federalist 65, it's almost as if Hamilton peered through the ages and commented on the current Republican failure to abandon Donald Trump: “The prosecution of [impeachments], for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly, or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influences, and interests on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of the parties than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.’ As you and Hamilton both point out, it is the comparative strength of the parties, not any real demonstration of innocence or guilt, that will regulate the decision as to the President's fate. In other words, the President's defense has been reduced to raw political power, no longer a genuine examination of facts, but rather a numbers game to assemble enough Senators to ensure Trump's acquittal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bormio Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 19 minutes ago, 15yds4gibberish said: While I think there is no qualitative equivalence between Clinton lying about a blow job in the oval office while under oath, and Trump withholding military aid to pressure another nation to dig up dirt on a likely political opponent and then his staff trying to cover it up, removal from office after impeachment is indeed a very high bar that has never been cleared in American history. You are in good company with your argument. In Federalist 65, it's almost as if Hamilton peered through the ages and commented on the current Republican failure to abandon Donald Trump: “The prosecution of [impeachments], for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly, or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influences, and interests on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of the parties than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.’ As you and Hamilton both point out, it is the comparative strength of the parties, not any real demonstration of innocence or guilt, that will regulate the decision as to the President's fate. In other words, the President's defense has been reduced to raw political power, no longer a genuine examination of facts, but rather a numbers game to assemble enough Senators to ensure Trump's acquittal. The goalposts moved a lot with Democratic politicians and the public during the Clinton affair - and will in this case as well, if the need arises. The bar is properly meant to be very high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 16 minutes ago, 15yds4gibberish said: While I think there is no qualitative equivalence between Clinton lying about a blow job in the oval office while under oath, and Trump withholding military aid to pressure another nation to dig up dirt on a likely political opponent and then his staff trying to cover it up, removal from office after impeachment is indeed a very high bar that has never been cleared in American history. You are in good company with your argument. In Federalist 65, it's almost as if Hamilton peered through the ages and commented on the current Republican failure to abandon Donald Trump: “The prosecution of [impeachments], for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly, or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influences, and interests on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of the parties than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.’ As you and Hamilton both point out, it is the comparative strength of the parties, not any real demonstration of innocence or guilt, that will regulate the decision as to the President's fate. In other words, the President's defense has been reduced to raw political power, no longer a genuine examination of facts, but rather a numbers game to assemble enough Senators to ensure Trump's acquittal. Astonishing...again. The unbelievably short sighted thinking is GOING to come back and bite this country again. In the future, if a Democrat were to do exactly what Trump is doing, there is zero doubt there would be outrage and immediate impeachment. I almost wish it would happen (even though I would never vote for any Democrat that openly stated he would accept help from a foreign country in order to win an election) but of course the amnesia would set in as none of what is happening now would be remembered. Trump openly stated on tv that he would accept help from a foreign country and would not report it to the FBI. AND STILL they think he is innocent and it is a witch hunt. Amazing that the most corrupt and biggest liar ever in the history of the world (Lol) is now thought of as the only human being left in this country who tells the truth and that can be trusted. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotBigdaddybloom Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 Assholes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 A retired, decorated US Air Force general from Pennsylvania has been busted on 15 child pornography possession counts, prosecutors announced Wednesday. Former Brig. Gen. Frank Sullivan was charged after a search of computers in his Mechanicsburg home revealed thousands of searches for “preteen” images, as well as photos of children “engaged in very graphic sexual acts,” the state’s attorney general Josh Shapiro said in a statement. https://nypost.com/2019/11/06/retired-air-force-general-arrested-on-child-porn-charges-prosecutors/amp/?__twitter_impression=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotBigdaddybloom Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 Rob Schneider is absolutely correct Unfortunately, people in California would vote for a bowl of shit if it had “D” next to it. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 6, 2019 Report Share Posted November 6, 2019 BREAKING: Republican Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin's campaign has asked for a remcanvass of vote totals that show him losing his re-election bid to Andy Beshear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 7, 2019 Report Share Posted November 7, 2019 BREAKING: 2 former Twitter employees and a Saudi national are accused of spying in a plot to provide the Saudi government with information about Twitter users, including critics of the Saudi government - NBC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 7, 2019 Report Share Posted November 7, 2019 More from the whistleblower attorney It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slotback Right Posted November 7, 2019 Report Share Posted November 7, 2019 https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1192168726101155843?s=20 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 7, 2019 Report Share Posted November 7, 2019 6 hours ago, Slotback Right said: https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1192168726101155843?s=20 Yep I posted this 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 7, 2019 Report Share Posted November 7, 2019 The House committees conducting the impeachment inquiry into President Trump have withdrawn their subpoena for former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman, who had requested that a judge determine whether he should comply with the subpoena or a White House order blocking him from testifying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 8, 2019 Report Share Posted November 8, 2019 @GardenStateBaller Polk County deputies say that 17 men were arrested at the conclusion of the month-long investigation, which targeted those who possessed and shared child pornography. Among those arrested were a former middle school assistant principal, two theme park employees, and a registered nurse. Deputies also conducted a separate special investigation during the month of October called Operation Trick-Or-Treat. During this operation, 14 men who were previously convicted of preying on children were also arrested. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 8, 2019 Report Share Posted November 8, 2019 So nobody is going to talk about the fact that a key Democrat witness in the impeachment BS lied under oath??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
15yds4gibberish Posted November 8, 2019 Report Share Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/5/2019 at 11:55 AM, 15yds4gibberish said: No word from the President yet on whether Sondland was: A) Just a coffee boy. B) Someone he only took a picture with once. C) A Deep State Never Trumper. D) Hunter Biden's business partner. Who had "I hardly knew the gentleman" ? 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 10 hours ago, HSFBfan said: So nobody is going to talk about the fact that a key Democrat witness in the impeachment BS lied under oath??? Business as usual....nothing to see here. Trump must go...ethics and morals be damned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 8 minutes ago, Blueliner said: Business as usual....nothing to see here. Trump must go...ethics and morals be damned. Oh ok. Because you know it's a pretty major story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 hour ago, HSFBfan said: Oh ok. Because you know it's a pretty major story Hell yeah it's huge. I'm agreeing with you. It's sad that these assholes can lie like this, and nobody holds them to account. Schiff is THE worst pathological liar. Hope the IG and Durham come crashing down on them hard. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted November 9, 2019 Report Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Blueliner said: Hell yeah it's huge. I'm agreeing with you. It's sad that these assholes can lie like this, and nobody holds them to account. Schiff is THE worst pathological liar. Hope the IG and Durham come crashing down on them hard. Nunes called him out before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat_Scratch Posted November 11, 2019 Report Share Posted November 11, 2019 On 11/6/2019 at 12:25 PM, stanscript said: Yeah, and Rudy Giuliani had some credibility as a pretty good lawyer but that was almost 20 years ago. I'm not so sure that most other lawyers would call her prominent. Perhaps well known is a better term but then again so is Michael Cohen. She seems to be more of an ambulance chaser now but that's really an asset because when the bus runs over her there will be one nearby. You should try to fix your own state before trying to fuck up the whole country. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueliner Posted November 11, 2019 Report Share Posted November 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Cat_Scratch said: You should try to fix your own state before trying to fuck up the whole country. Well said, Cat. My once kick ass state is now an unlivable crap hole. It will only get worse as long as the usual local criminal political families, Hollywood, and big tech run the show while the MSM covers for them and their anti-American and economy-killing policies. I’m counting my days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.