Omaha Vol Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Guru said: Good grief. Again with this milquetoast crap. Clarkston was garbage. Who cares if it was the state championship? Teams don't become better simply because you label a game as the state championship. Jesus, you’re a moron! Making a state championship absolutely does mean you’re playing well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: Why didn’t you mention that? One, because you already did. And, two, it doesn't matter because Dakota is garbage. The fact that they didn't blow them out in the first place is more evidence that they suck. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: I’ve listed the most glaring one multiple times. No, you've lied multiple times to try to save face for your stupid criteria. Ranking Oakland for the reasons you claimed was stupid. You couldn't defend yourself and so you tried to change the subject. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Omaha Vol said: Making a state championship absolutely does mean you’re playing well. Clarkston lost two of their last three regular season games. 😄 Making a state championship could mean any number of things. One of which is that you're simply better than a lot of crappy teams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omaha Vol Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Guru said: I love it. Now the first game didn't matter. All games matter when evaluating teams. This is just a dodge used by clowns like you to justify crappy rankings after the fact. And the second one doesn’t? That means they got A LOT better than they were earlier on. Hence, the positive movement in the rankings. Why can’t you get that through your thick skull? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Omaha Vol said: And the second one doesn’t? 👇 5 minutes ago, The Guru said: All games matter when evaluating teams. 🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: That means they got A LOT better than they were earlier on. No, it doesn't. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 24 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: Hence, the positive movement in the rankings. Why can’t you get that through your thick skull? Because you're a complete moron who knows nothing about high school football and you make some of the dumbest and most incompetent arguments I've seen. There was no positive movement in the rankings. You ranked them #54 in your final rankings. You thought they were the 54th best team in the country. You're a bozo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omaha Vol Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 Sorry Whiteshoes. I didn’t intend on highjacking your blog. That idiot Canes (or Los or Guru or whatever he goes by) brings me down to an immature level. I’ll just ignore him when it comes to your poll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: That means they got A LOT better than they were earlier on. They had another rematch that year. Won the first game by 21. Won the second by 27. What does it mean? Nothing. Just like the rematch against Dakota. The fact that they struggled so badly the first time is the important part. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: I didn’t intend on highjacking your blog. Now you don't even know what a blog is. Jesus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 20 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: Chippewa Valley was definitely worthy last year. This year it’s Muskegon in MI. ME: Why should Chippewa Valley be ranked? OMAHA CLOWN: Because they're worthy! 🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 Los top 100 Would be 1- STA 2-100 who cares because every team not named sta is garbage. What a jackass! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 9 minutes ago, I AM IRONMAN said: Los top 100 Would be 1- STA 2-100 who cares because every team not named sta is garbage. What a jackass! Except that my critiques have nothing to do with STA and I haven't mentioned them at all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 John Curtis is SO good Rummel has to beat them twice to pass them up. lol Wait for it! We got that veer figured out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 2 hours ago, The Guru said: So they avenged a loss to Marietta by beating a completely different team? Yeah. You're a dumbass. 🤡 Who you dating? A mirror? 57 minutes ago, The Guru said: Good grief. Again with this milquetoast crap. Clarkston was garbage. Who cares if it was the state championship? Teams don't become better simply because you label a game as the state championship. Who are you? Charlie Brown? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 57 minutes ago, Omaha Vol said: Jesus, you’re a moron! Making a state championship absolutely does mean you’re playing well. Him and redzone may as well start posting with same account since they are complete clowns and ass kissing each other lol 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, RedZone said: John Curtis is SO good Rummel has to beat them twice to pass them up. lol Wait for it! We got that veer figured out. Rummel isn't a elite team clown 🤡 And you don't know football, go talk on some regional board, or Start your own blog You know they say terrible ideas will work successfully if you try it enough times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 28 minutes ago, The Guru said: Except that my critiques have nothing to do with STA and I haven't mentioned them at all. Nah you just Choose to defend them anytime someone bashes them and bash any other team Funny you also talk good about STA opponents, probably to make STA sound better 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammyswordsman Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 3 hours ago, Extremely Humble said: Sammy doesn't seem to understand this. Oh I understand completely. I also understand, as does 99% of the members on this forum, that your team is completely unvetted, has zero relevant wins, or even relevant close losses, yet continues to be ranked in these lazy @ss polls. Only in the un competitive Nor Cal (National Top 100 incubator) does this phenomena occur What I didn't understand is that @maxchoboian considers these polls to be beyond reproach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxchoboian Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 25 minutes ago, Sammyswordsman said: What I didn't understand is that @maxchoboian considers these polls to be beyond reproach. Your criticism can't be proven -- it's your opinion that a team in California is or isn't better than a team in Michigan. Enjoy what you do and let others take a whack at it also, without feeling the need to call their efforts "lazy." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammyswordsman Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, maxchoboian said: Your criticism can't be proven -- it's your opinion that a team in California is or isn't better than a team in Michigan. Enjoy what you do and let others take a whack at it also, without feeling the need to call their efforts "lazy." Fortunately or unfortunately, I hold the guys that put out polls to a higher standard, and expect that due diligence is done prior to releasing a product, that everyone wants to have confidence in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extremely Humble Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 58 minutes ago, Sammyswordsman said: Oh I understand completely. I also understand, as does 99% of the members on this forum, that your team is completely unvetted, has zero relevant wins, or even relevant close losses, yet continues to be ranked in these lazy @ss polls. Only in the un competitive Nor Cal (National Top 100 incubator) does this phenomena occur What I didn't understand is that @maxchoboian considers these polls to be beyond reproach. There's several teams in your biased tiers that fit this description. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammyswordsman Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 16 minutes ago, Extremely Humble said: There's several teams in your biased tiers that fit this description. The Tiers are crowd sourced, and as such will place any team on a Tier that is talked about on these boards, or a member requests that team to be placed on a tier. If you have an issue with which Tier a team is placed on, The Tiers encourage you (as a valued crowd source) to make your case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxchoboian Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 35 minutes ago, Sammyswordsman said: Fortunately or unfortunately, I hold the guys that put out polls to a higher standard, and expect that due diligence is done prior to releasing a product, that everyone wants to have confidence in. And "due diligence", in your book, at times is simply strength of schedule, whether the team wins those games or not. I disagree with that being due diligence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.