Jump to content

Are The "Very Soft" Kansas City Chiefs A Dynasty?


RedZone

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RedZone said:

They won.....evidently they weren't soft.

Soft teams lose badly most of the time.

I guess the Eagles were soft last year for giving up 38 points in the Super Bowl.

Just stop.

 

Soft teams can win,  they just have to play the outscore you game 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, Crusader12-0 said:

-Bills miss 42 yd FG

-Ravens turn it over twice in the Red Zone in 4th quarter 

-A punt took a freak bounce vs SF

Good teams capitalize on breaks.  SF had all sorts of chances to put distance between themselves and the Chiefs.  They failed.  They don’t have a leader like Mahomes, Brady or Montana.  A real killer.  And Shanahan just seems to do the wrong thing late in these big games.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Bormio said:

And Shanahan just seems to do the wrong thing late in these big games.

At least he kicked the field goal at an appropriate time unlike another infamous game where a field goal almost guaranteed a SB win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Crusader12-0 said:

-Bills miss 42 yd FG

-Ravens turn it over twice in the Red Zone in 4th quarter 

-A punt took a freak bounce vs SF

This and that and that and this.

Part of being a dynasty is putting yourself in position to be a dynasty.

That's what a dynasty is all about.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...