concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Just now, The Guru said: "OK, you got me. I was wrong. And, yes, I then lied about my wording after-the-fact but here's my explanation for why it's not a big deal." concha after every lie and/or misrepresentation of his. You are thumping your chest over immaterialities. FYI, I think the class sees how you have dodged the lack of movement in the unemployment rate in the last 12-18 months of Obama and the much greater movement (in less time) that happened with Trump at the helm. This is Andy's MO. Ass-kicked in the fundamental argument? Well, Andy will just grasp onto an immaterial point to deflect away from the ass-kicking. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, concha said: That you have to nitpick this after losing so badly on the fundamental argument is why you are a dick, Andy. I love that you've moved off of total defense of yourself and are now just calling me a dick. ME: You're a liar concha: OK, yeah, but, well, you're a dick! 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, concha said: That you have to nitpick this after losing so badly on the fundamental argument is why you are a dick, Andy. concha lies about statistics to support his political agenda. I expose those lies and call him out. concha's response is that it's nitpicky to point out statistical lies. He's just dishonest. Nothing else to say about it. He tacitly admits it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: You are thumping your chest over immaterialities. concha is on the record that statistical lies are "nitpicky" and "immaterial" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: This is Andy's MO. Yes, my MO is to expose your lies and to win so thoroughly that your lie machine has started to malfunction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 concha says Obama is bad because of (insert lies). I call out those lies. concha responds that pointing the lies out is immaterial. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, The Guru said: "OK, you got me. I was wrong. And, yes, I then lied about my wording after-the-fact but here's my explanation for why it's not a big deal." concha after every lie and/or misrepresentation of his. "Dropping 0.2% in a year is effectively going nowhere." Note how Andy has been ignoring the word "effectively". The drop over the final 12 to 16 months under Obama was 0.2% to 0.3%. It had dropped that much under Trump in just 2 months (BLS table you posted). By the end of 2017 it was at 0.6%. This was getting into what was deemed natural unemployment level territory. Andy get his ass kicked. So what does Andy do? He harps about a source I used being off by 0.1%. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Guru said: I love that you've moved off of total defense of yourself and are now just calling me a dick. ME: You're a liar concha: OK, yeah, but, well, you're a dick! 😄 Actually, I am pointing out that you are a dick and continuing to kick your ass. 👍 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, concha said: "Dropping 0.2% in a year is effectively going nowhere." Note how Andy has been ignoring the word "effectively". That's your explanation after-the-fact. Here's what you actually said at the time before I posted the facts: 2 hours ago, concha said: Pray tell, Andy, given that unemployment had gone nowhere for over a year prior to Trump, are you actually going to give credit to Obama? Then here's your lie about your lie: 1 hour ago, concha said: I pointed that unemployment had hardly moved in the 12-18 months prior to Trump taking over. No, you said it had gone nowhere. Going nowhere is not hardly moving. You lie about statistics more than anybody I've ever interacted with. Then you lie about your lie. It's breathtaking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 5 minutes ago, concha said: Andy get his ass kicked. Malfunctioning lie bot trying to make himself feel better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, concha said: Actually, I am pointing out that you are a dick and continuing to kick your ass. No, you're just calling me a dick. The jury is already in on who's been truthful here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 3 hours ago, badrouter said: "The media" is not in a place to give evidence or a reasonable explanation. The media provides a platform for the public health experts to do all of that. And they have. In the topic of 'people led by the media' it is....silly... If you want to add in 'politicians' and 'health experts' to those without a reasonable explanation...well... feel free 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 4 hours ago, badrouter said: seek help. Flattery will get you no where either 😘 But maybe you can lick Guru's balls.... He's into that flattery ball stuff, or so he posts.... PS. you two would probably get along well 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 3 hours ago, The Guru said: concha says Obama is bad because of (insert lies). I call out those lies. concha responds that pointing the lies out is immaterial. 🤡 Andy, I know you think you're doing well, but when you point to an honest mistake of 0.1% (due to a website apparently having not updated its numbers) and use it to call someone a liar, you just look like a dick. It's your MO. It would be like me saying "The guy passed for 300 yards" and then you making a federal case because it was actually 297 yards. "Concha is a LIAR!!!!" 🤣 You lost the basic argument. Period. So you desperately grasp onto tiny and immaterial points to divert attention from your ass-kicking. It's just your (sad) nature. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 21 minutes ago, The Guru said: That's your explanation after-the-fact. Here's what you actually said at the time before I posted the facts: Then here's your lie about your lie: No, you said it had gone nowhere. Going nowhere is not hardly moving. You lie about statistics more than anybody I've ever interacted with. Then you lie about your lie. It's breathtaking. Andy, if you think 0.2% and 0.1% differences make me a liar in "breathtaking" fashion, then have at it. 🤡 The reality is that unemployment numbers under Trump moved substantially after not having done so under Obama for an extended period. That is the truth. That is fact. And it left you with nowhere to go but bleat about 0.1% difference here and 0.2% there. 🤡 🤣 This is classic Canes/Andy. It's comical. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 51 minutes ago, The Guru said: Yes, my MO is to expose your lies and to win so thoroughly that your lie machine has started to malfunction. That's great, Andy. Except for the losing the fundamental argument part. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 41 minutes ago, The Guru said: No, you're just calling me a dick. The jury is already in on who's been truthful here. Andy's jury of himself... ...the guy who lost the basic argument and then goes on rants about 0.1% differences stemming from a site not having the latest number about something. 🤣 🤣 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I AM IRONMAN Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 I think we need a steel cage match between Concha and Andy televised of course no one in the stands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 24, 2020 Report Share Posted March 24, 2020 Just now, I AM IRONMAN said: I think we need a steel cage match between Concha and Andy televised of course no one in the stands Make sure the cage is, in fact, just steel. If it's an alloy or some other metal, Andy will be all over you for being a liar. Even it's just 0.1% off of pure steel. 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bormio Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 20 hours ago, Bormio said: Reports are Pelosi folded. To try and pass the Senate bill in the House by unanimous consent So Pelosi folded 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Bormio said: So Pelosi folded You're a buffoon. If she folded then why did they get the measures that they wanted and why didn't they agree to the initial deal on Sunday? You think they rejected the initial deal and then just sat around for 2 days? Then panicked for no reason and accepted the original deal? I would say you can't be that dumb but then I remembered who I'm interacting with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 I love the search function. Here's concha claiming that the Labor Force Participation Rate "has stabilized" in 2018 after plummeting under the last guy. On 1/18/2018 at 11:08 AM, concha said: 1) I am well aware of the labor participation rate, which has stabilized after plummeting under the last guy. Then 12 days later he said it "basically stabilized in 2013" which was under the last guy. On 1/30/2018 at 9:58 PM, concha said: It basically stabilized in late 2013. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Guru said: I love the search function. Here's concha claiming that the Labor Force Participation Rate "has stabilized" in 2018 after plummeting under the last guy. Then 12 days later he said it "basically stabilized in 2013" which was under the last guy. 😄 Andy, for some reason you think I'm contradicting myself. 1) It plummeted under Obama 2) It stabilized after plummeting. 3) It has since actually increased under Trump Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 64.8 64.9 64.9 65.2 64.9 64.6 64.6 64.7 64.6 64.4 64.6 64.3 2011 64.2 64.1 64.2 64.2 64.1 64.0 64.0 64.1 64.2 64.1 64.1 64.0 2012 63.7 63.8 63.8 63.7 63.7 63.8 63.7 63.5 63.6 63.8 63.6 63.7 2013 63.7 63.4 63.3 63.4 63.4 63.4 63.3 63.3 63.2 62.8 63.0 62.9 2014 62.9 62.9 63.1 62.8 62.9 62.8 62.9 62.9 62.8 62.9 62.9 62.8 2015 62.9 62.7 62.6 62.8 62.9 62.7 62.6 62.6 62.4 62.5 62.5 62.7 2016 62.7 62.8 62.9 62.8 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.9 62.9 62.8 62.7 62.7 2017 62.8 62.8 62.9 63.0 62.8 62.8 62.8 62.9 63.1 62.7 62.7 62.7 2018 62.7 63.0 62.9 62.9 62.9 63.0 62.9 62.7 62.8 62.9 62.9 63.0 2019 63.2 63.1 63.0 62.8 62.9 63.0 63.0 63.2 63.2 63.3 63.2 63.2 2020 63.4 63.4 You are one strange and desperate weirdo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 And here's concha lying about which age group saw the largest decline in Labor Force Participation Rate. On 1/31/2018 at 8:14 AM, concha said: Most of the decline has been prime working age folks age 25-54. And the actual truth. On 1/31/2018 at 8:33 AM, Guccifer said: You lied about the age group with the greatest decline. Ages 25-54 saw a minor decrease since 1996. But 16-24 saw the largest percentage decrease. 🤡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guru Posted March 25, 2020 Report Share Posted March 25, 2020 18 minutes ago, concha said: Andy, for some reason you think I'm contradicting myself. 1) It plummeted under Obama 2) It stabilized after plummeting. 3) It has since actually increased under Trump You said is "has stabilized" in 2018 Then 12 days later, when I posted a chart, you were forced to admit that it stabilized in 2013 which was the middle of the other guys' term. 15 months after that post, as late April 2019, it was still 62.8% which was the exact same rate as it was when Obama left office. You're not just contradicting yourself. You're lying until you're forced to admit the truth. Either that or you're incredibly ignorant and uninformed. I think that it's probably a little bit of both: ignorance and dishonesty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.