Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 28 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: And he was at work on the clock. There could be rules against that. Does your job allow you to protest on the clock during down time? This is comical. He didn't have any issues with his employer at the time. He had issues with white fans like you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 24 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: He was insulted, maligned and blackballed for being a piece of shit: So it was silent and non-violent. But you judged that he was a piece of shit so you disqualified his protest. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 25 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: You have the right to do all that, but I also have the right not to associate in any with you. Just like NFL owners don’t You're just a liar that's all. You don't have any objective standards. You just hate the people who don't think/vote like you. As I've been able to demonstrated so frequently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said: Interestingly enough, your opinions are always that any protest with which you disagree with is un-American or other such nonsense. And when you give up objective criteria for what constitutes an offensive protest, an example can always be found of you breaking those criteria to criticize a black person, a gay person, a trans person, etc. He was protesting on the clock in which the owners didn’t want anything to do with. On top of the affinity for extremists. They didn’t want that near their brand. That’s their choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: He was protesting on the clock in which the owners didn’t want anything to do with. That was after the fact. At the time the only heat he was getting was from white people like you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: On top of the affinity for extremists. You will vote a third time for an extremist in November. You, in fact, glory in your affinity for extremists. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 53 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: But, as any adult can attest, sentiment isn't always correlated with the language. America First has an unequivocally racist and xenophobic history in this country. It actually started (and is mainly related to) policy related to keeping the US out of foreign wars. The Klan, when millions of mainly good Democrats were members, used it in the 20s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 Third attempt... Why is Andy dodging this? (We all know) Andy, do you think that if we enter into a defense pact with another nation that they should meet their pledges and obligations under that agreement? Yes? Or no? Further... if said ally or allies are chronically negligent in meeting the terms of the agreement - to the point where they cannot even begin to meet their obligations - do you think we should just STFU and take it for years and decades? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 4 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: So it was silent and non-violent. But you judged that he was a piece of shit so you disqualified his protest. Exactly. No his lies and rhetoric literally got police killed. Cops were getting ran up on and shot dead over the type of lies he espoused. The lies about police brutality have been widely debunked as a left wing myth. The statistics back it up irrefutably. So when he continues to push those lies and police continue being in the line of fire, it ceases to be a “peaceful protest” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 9 minutes ago, concha said: It actually started (and is mainly related to) policy related to keeping the US out of foreign wars. The Klan, when millions of mainly good Democrats were members, used it in the 20s. So, what you are saying is you don't want to learn history and insist on maintaining your childish and completely incorrect view of history. You really believe anybody believes that today's Democrats are the same people as 1920s Democrats? Strange how 1920s Democrats world view lines up exactly with today's Republicans. Almost as if it really is the same group of idiots. Same with those who didn't want to fight for our independence, wanted to free the slaves, women to vote, or wanted civil rights, or anything else that moves us forward. Also, the Klan votes exactly like you do and always has. Btw, you know what would keep us out of foreign wars. A strong NATO. And that does not depend on Germany paying 1.6% or 2%. It is an agreement not a transaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: No his lies and rhetoric literally got police killed. Cops were getting ran up on and shot dead over the type of lies he espoused. The lies about police brutality have been widely debunked as a left wing myth. The statistics back it up irrefutably. So when he continues to push those lies and police continue being in the line of fire, it ceases to be a “peaceful protest” This should be easy for you to prove then. Why no link? You didn't just type words without knowing what you are talking about did you? Of course you did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 25 minutes ago, concha said: Third attempt... Why is Andy dodging this? (We all know) Andy, do you think that if we enter into a defense pact with another nation that they should meet their pledges and obligations under that agreement? Yes? Or no? What we've suspected for a long time can now be confirmed. Concha can't read. 👇 1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said: Typical concha dishonest framing. Per usual. If serious people enter an agreement that calls for other countries to spend 2% of their *own* GDP on defense and they spend 1.4% but they've made pledges to increase it, said serious people don't vow to cancel the agreement. Donald Trump is not a serious person and neither are you. This isn't a slum in Queens. This isn't a money making scheme. This isn't a shakedown opportunity. I know that this doesn't compute with you because everything is a shakedown opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 32 minutes ago, World Citizen said: So, what you are saying is you don't want to learn history and insist on maintaining your childish and completely incorrect view of history. You really believe anybody believes that today's Democrats are the same people as 1920s Democrats? Strange how 1920s Democrats world view lines up exactly with today's Republicans. Almost as if it really is the same group of idiots. Same with those who didn't want to fight for our independence, wanted to free the slaves, women to vote, or wanted civil rights, or anything else that moves us forward. Also, the Klan votes exactly like you do and always has. Btw, you know what would keep us out of foreign wars. A strong NATO. And that does not depend on Germany paying 1.6% or 2%. It is an agreement not a transaction. Strange how the Klan had several million members in the 20s, and now that they are supposedly Republican they hardly exist. You're welcome. As regards NATO, you are simply a colossal dumbass. 🤡 Here's where Germany is because in your dumbass view that it's just the agreement that makes it strong. Germany is basically tied now with Japan for the 3rs largest economy on the planet and can't defend itself. You don't defend with handshakes. You do it with handshakes backed up by the threat of force. Which requires weapons. Which require adequate and consistent military spending. Dumbass. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-bad-news-bundeswehr-an-examination-of-the-truly-dire-state-of-germany-s-military-a-df92eaaf-e3f9-464d-99a3-ef0c27dcc797 An Examination of the Truly Dire State of Germany's Military https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/germanys-military-crisis-deutschland-unprepared-for-war-12796649 Germany's military crisis: Deutschland unprepared for war Germany's failing military infrastructure bears a stark warning for Chancellor Scholz, namely that in case of war, the country won't be able to defend itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: What we've suspected for a long time can now be confirmed. Concha can't read. 👇 Andy is duckin' and dodgin' with bullshit. In other words, Friday. 🤣 The 2% number dates back to 2006. Supposedly Germany will meet the 2% number this year, only after Putin invaded Ukraine. IF they do, it will be the first year since 1991(!) that they have spent 2% of gdp on their military. Over 30 years! Not surprisingly, you can't trust their numbers either... So Andy is left defending a dishonest grifter and saying utterly moronic crap about defense pacts being about the agreement, when members of the pact won't even spend enough to defend THEMSELVES. 🤡 https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-defense-spending-balancing-nato-and-ukraine-aid/a-68038674 How Germany fudges the math on NATO and Ukraine Andy LOVES him some grifting Germans. 💋 💕 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 31 minutes ago, World Citizen said: So, what you are saying is you don't want to learn history and insist on maintaining your childish and completely incorrect view of history. You really believe anybody believes that today's Democrats are the same people as 1920s Democrats? Strange how 1920s Democrats world view lines up exactly with today's Republicans. Almost as if it really is the same group of idiots. Same with those who didn't want to fight for our independence, wanted to free the slaves, women to vote, or wanted civil rights, or anything else that moves us forward. Also, the Klan votes exactly like you do and always has. Btw, you know what would keep us out of foreign wars. A strong NATO. And that does not depend on Germany paying 1.6% or 2%. It is an agreement not a transaction. I'm saying you are a dumbass. Proven time and time again. Shut up, Dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: No his lies and rhetoric literally got police killed. Cops were getting ran up on and shot dead over the type of lies he espoused. This is obvious nonsense. There were 3 multiple police fatality incidents that year. Two happened within 10 days of each other in July after the deaths of Alton Sterling and Philando Castille. Which were the causes of Colin Kaepernick's protests that started in August. So the cause of something can't also be the result, dumbass. The third shooting was in November and the shooter was a white guy named Scott Michael Greene. It had nothing to do with police brutality. Several other incidents of police being ambushed also had nothing to do with police brutality. For instance, this incident was because the shooter claimed that the police wouldn't let him see his kids. It's clear that you just make stuff up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 42 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: The lies about police brutality have been widely debunked as a left wing myth. No, it has not. What has been debunked, however, is the idea that Colin Kaepernick caused police officers to be killed. That's the Mt. Everest of bullshit lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 1 hour ago, concha said: The Klan, when millions of mainly good Democrats were members, used it in the 20s. You can always count on concha to obfuscate in order to dodge inconvenient truths. The Klan has always been conservative regardless of what party carried that flag at the time. So, in other words, the Klan has always aligned with concha's current beliefs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 42 minutes ago, World Citizen said: You really believe anybody believes that today's Democrats are the same people as 1920s Democrats? Strange how 1920s Democrats world view lines up exactly with today's Republicans. He will dodge this like the plague. He will resort to his usual dance routine which includes just repeating a single, irrelevant talking point over and over again. Just like he won't denounce Pinochet, he won't ever disassociate from fellow right-wing travelers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Finch Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 34 minutes ago, concha said: Strange how the Klan had several million members in the 20s, and now that they are supposedly Republican they hardly exist. Among stupid and embarrassing arguments that concha has made, this is one the stupidest and most embarrassing. The Klan has been made socially unacceptable through decades of social policy and norms. The kind of people who would make up it's membership still exist. They just don't wear hoods and burn crosses. They also vote exclusively for the Republican Party. And you won't ever denounce them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: You can always count on concha to obfuscate in order to dodge inconvenient truths. The Klan has always been conservative regardless of what party carried that flag at the time. So, in other words, the Klan has always aligned with conch's current beliefs. Interesting schtick, given that the racist Democrats have kept their boot on the necks of black folks from their very beginnings. First with slavery, then the Klan and now through government dependence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said: Among stupid and embarrassing arguments that concha has made, this is one the stupidest and most embarrassing. The Klan has been made socially unacceptable through decades of social policy and norms. The kind of people who would make up it's membership still exist. They just don't wear hoods and burn crosses. They also vote exclusively for the Republican Party. And you won't ever denounce them. I won't? I am utterly against racism. Your schtick is laughable given the history of the party you fellate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, concha said: Strange how the Klan had several million members in the 20s, and now that they are supposedly Republican they hardly exist. LMAO!!! Do they NOT exist because of the Republican party? Or people just decided to not be racist in 2024? Too damn funny. Keep up the embarrassing display of ignorance. 😆 Fyi...they exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 1 hour ago, concha said: I'm saying you are a dumbass. Proven time and time again. Shut up, Dummy. Fantastic argument. Extremely impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted April 26 Report Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said: No, it has not. What has been debunked, however, is the idea that Colin Kaepernick caused police officers to be killed. That's the Mt. Everest of bullshit lies. https://manhattan.institute/article/the-myth-of-systemic-police-racism 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.