Jump to content

2020 election based on likely voter polls only


HSFBfan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, zulu1128 said:

I think we can all stipulate that Biden will likely win the popular vote. 🤷‍♂️

zulu1128 forgetting that his fellow travelers are dipshits.

😄

5 hours ago, Blueliner said:

Calling my shot. Trump is going to win the pop.vote as well...not that bit matters as mentioned. But it will be a strong statement. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HSFBfan said:

Rasmussen 

PA is a tie

Trump has 27% of the black vote in PA

If that holds across the country he wins easily 

Polling is all over the place because 1) some variability is inherent and 2) no one is sure what the electorate will look like.  People take raw data and then “correct” for what they assume the electorate will look like (number of D,R and I).  Those assumptions can have a large impact on the polling results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bormio said:

Polling is all over the place because 1) some variability is inherent and 2) no one is sure what the electorate will look like.  People take raw data and then “correct” for what they assume the electorate will look like (number of D,R and I).  Those assumptions can have a large impact on the polling results.

Were still 2 months out. People will start paying attention more now into October 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rasmussen 1,000 LV of Wisconsin (Sept. 1-2), Biden +8

Morning Consult 763 LV of Wisconsin (Aug. 27 - Sept. 5), Biden +6

YouGov 978 LV of Wisconsin (Sept. 2-4), Biden +6

 

Univ. of Texas at Tyler 978 LV of Texas, Trump +2 (TX Senate: Cornyn +11)

 

Looks like Trump's tactics in Wisconsin are not working. If he focused on calming the situation instead of throwing blame everywhere, he'd likely be showing better.

Wisconsin was not polled by major firms in 2016 and the smaller polls were way off, but the polls now properly weigh non-college educated whites. So these numbers are probably pretty close to current trends in Wisconsin. It's rare Rasmussen finds that much slant towards the Dem in a swing state (usually Trump gets an extra 1.5 - 2% in a Rasmussen poll compared to the rest of the field). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DownSouth said:

Looks like Trump's tactics in Wisconsin are not working. If he focused on calming the situation instead of throwing blame everywhere, he'd likely be showing better.

The irony of Trump is that if he was more measured and more dedicated to solving problems then he'd get credit in places like Wisconsin or on issues like COVID-19.

But if he was like that then his base wouldn't be as rabid or supportive of him.

They like him precisely because he's a flippant dipshit who doesn't understand how to handle situations.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

The irony of Trump is that if he was more measured and more dedicated to solving problems then he'd get credit in places like Wisconsin or on issues like COVID-19.

But if he was like that then his base wouldn't be as rabid or supportive of him.

They like him precisely because he's a flippant dipshit who doesn't understand how to handle situations.

He'd be crushing Biden if he hadn't been such a conspiracy minded/ snake oil hydroxy salesman for so long with COVID. Had he let the economy stay shut for an extra month, encouraged masks, and used the Defense Production Act earlier (instead of continually just saying he'd use it), and organized a better test response (instead of saying it's overrated) - Biden would have no chance.

Not much Biden could do aside from stay home for a few months, and had Trump been competent he'd be getting praised by the whole country and probably be up almost 10%.

Had Trump (the supposed great deal maker) brought the Congress together to put together a great extension on unemployment benefits that would save mortgages and evictions and peoples bank accounts while the pandemic is still going - he probably would have won a bunch more lower income Dem leaning voters.

As you said though, the base wouldn't be so whipped into a frenzy (they'd still vote for him though), and here he is, as the incumbent - having to hope he can repeat the same incredibly narrow way he won 4 years ago.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@HSFBfan let this fall to the second page.

Probably because that polls like this are becoming more common.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/pennsylvania/

A+ Marist poll has Biden +9.

It's not a likely outcome but it means that Biden is certainly in the lead by some amount.

These dopes have been too busy bragging about a tied poll in Florida.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

@HSFBfan let this fall to the second page.

Probably because that polls like this are becoming more common.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/pennsylvania/

A+ Marist poll has Biden +9.

It's not a likely outcome but it means that Biden is certainly in the lead by some amount.

These dopes have been too busy bragging about a tied poll in Florida.

On 10/9/16, Marist had Clinton +12 in Pennsylvania 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...