HSFBfan Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/15/trump-administration-sanctions-russians-for-interfering-in-2016-elections.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedZone Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 Great! Now post your high school diploma. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 About time. A full year later. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: About time. A full year later. Well, you gotta' some "things" out of the way... don't wanna shoot yourself in the foot. Not saying "things" were in the way, but you know... "things". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 hour ago, HSFBfan said: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/15/trump-administration-sanctions-russians-for-interfering-in-2016-elections.html Without the nerve agent attack in the UK, these sanctions would have never been carried out. Trump dug in his heels on this issue for as long as he could. He will find a way to "reimburse" Putin. After all Trump is Putin's Poodle. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, stanscript said: Without the nerve agent attack in the UK, these sanctions would have never been carried out. Trump dug in his heels on this issue for as long as he could. He will find a way to "reimburse" Putin. After all Trump is Putin's Poodle. Yes. Of course he wanted Trump in the presidency when nobody thought he had a chance of winning. After all, with the likes of Barry and Hillary in charge, he only stole the Crimea and got 20% of our nation's uranium production... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanscript Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 minute ago, concha said: Yes. Of course he wanted Trump in the presidency when nobody thought he had a chance of winning. After all, with the likes of Barry and Hillary in charge, he only stole the Crimea and got 20% of our nation's uranium production... So why would he want Trump, if Hillary was such a pushover? Answer: Hillary was someone that was too tough for Putin. Putin had the goods on Trump, so "the Donald" would become Putin's Poodle. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 25 minutes ago, stanscript said: So why would he want Trump, if Hillary was such a pushover? Answer: Hillary was someone that was too tough for Putin. Putin had the goods on Trump, so "the Donald" would become Putin's Poodle. Russians did the anti-Trump dossier. Hilary gave them uranium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AztecPadre Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 53 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: About time. A full year later. Baby steps brotha. He had no choice, he needed a distraction to cover his porn star thing and administration resignations that seem to happen daily. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbcaptiron Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 59 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: Well, you gotta' some "things" out of the way... don't wanna shoot yourself in the foot. Not saying "things" were in the way, but you know... "things". Funny how Fox run's with the old 'Trump Administration' promotional message in the latest clip......funny because wouldn't it have to be Tillerson's State Department, that is responsible for 'employing' these sanctions...not Trump, after doing his part and signing them LOL Golly gee...Tilly is axed....sanctions start rolling..again. Certainly Doesn't quite fit the bullshit narrative these Anti-Trumpers have been spewing for how long now??? Ask them about why or Tillerson or point to this.....you'll get the revolving door diversionary anti-prez cartoons as your only reply... ROFL 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbcaptiron Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 hour ago, stanscript said: So why would he want Trump, if Hillary was such a pushover? Answer: Hillary was someone that was too tough for Putin. Putin had the goods on Trump, so "the Donald" would become Putin's Poodle. ROFL .... Hillary was so tough she twisted Putin's arm and nearly broke it.....as she shoved Uranium up his ass... Funny...never knew Clinton used a 'body double' for her 'action scenes'... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: You do know that Uranium 1 is a Canadian company, don't you? Dig deeper. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfaddict1 Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 20 minutes ago, concha said: Hilary gave them uranium. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-uraniumone/informant-had-no-evidence-clinton-benefited-from-uranium-sale-democrats-idUSKCN1GK2MU https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/26/the-facts-behind-trumps-repeated-claim-about-hillary-clintons-role-in-the-russian-uranium-deal/?utm_term=.580cefcf9a47 The Pinocchio Test Trump and his campaign claim that Clinton “gave” or “handed over” 20 percent of American uranium rights to the Russians. Through the Uranium One deal, the Russian state-owned nuclear energy company does now have control over 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity. But it cannot export the uranium. In 2010, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States approved the sale of the majority of the shares to the Russians. The State Department was one of nine agencies on the committee that approved the deal. The deal was also separately approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. There is no evidence Clinton herself got involved in the deal personally, and it is highly questionable that this deal even rose to the level of the secretary of state. Theoretically, as Schweizer says, Clinton could have intervened. But even then, it ultimately would have been Obama’s decision whether to suspend or block the deal. We wavered between Three and Four Pinocchios. Trump so often uses broad-brushed language that pushes him into Four Pinocchio territory, and this is yet another one of those cases. He specifically names Hillary Clinton as the active agent in the Uranium One deal, saying she “gave them” or “handed over” uranium to the Russians, but that is not the case. Then, he further claimed the sale went forward in exchange “for a big payment.” There’s no evidence for that claim either. Trump could have avoided so many Pinocchios had he been more careful with the language. For example: “Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of nine agencies that approved the deal.” Words matter. Four Pinocchios (About our rating scale) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 The Washington Post fact checker. Listen, if a left-wing rag telling you that Hillz was squeaky clean makes you feel better, then great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: http://www.uranium1.com/ How much? Most of all, Why? She, or her foundation got kickbacks but your claim of her giving or selling something that belongs to the U.S. are false. The company has operation in the U.S. but is a Canadian company HQ'd in Toronto. 1) A little 2) To be informed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: Here is the whole story by Factcheck https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/ Who owns the majority or Uranium One? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sportsnut said: Factcheck is credible. Based on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBP66 Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 hour ago, concha said: Yes. Of course he wanted Trump in the presidency when nobody thought he had a chance of winning. After all, with the likes of Barry and Hillary in charge, he only stole the Crimea and got 20% of our nation's uranium production... vs. having a personal puppet??.....Putin runs Washington....there's a story floating out there that Romney was first slated to be Sec. of State....UNTIL Putin got wind of it and had Donny pick another Sec. of State...one that was going to be more friendly to Russia...Romney was already on record has being hard on Russia...calling them our #1 threat...so Rex got the job.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfaddict1 Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/us/politics/trump-organization-subpoena-mueller-russia.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 hour ago, HawgGoneIt said: About time. A full year later. how does this stack up with what Congress voted to do? Is this fully implemented now or just something so Trump can say he did something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 hours ago, concha said: Russians did the anti-Trump dossier. Hilary gave them uranium. 3 hours ago, dbcaptiron said: ROFL .... Hillary was so tough she twisted Putin's arm and nearly broke it.....as she shoved Uranium up his ass... Funny...never knew Clinton used a 'body double' for her 'action scenes'... Check out https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/?_ga=2.268189580.363148527.1521145752-1736663306.1521145752, let me know what you think. "The Politicization of the FBI", I alluded to this about a week ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 17 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said: Check out https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/?_ga=2.268189580.363148527.1521145752-1736663306.1521145752, let me know what you think. "The Politicization of the FBI", I alluded to this about a week ago. Damn. That is excellent. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFORDGAWOLVES Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, concha said: Damn. That is excellent. . pg 3, I get the monthly hard copy, because some topics are wordy and don't interest me as much. lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonereal Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, concha said: Damn. That is excellent. . I read the first sentence and howled in laughter then I came back and read your post and let go another belly laugh what is wrong with you conspiracy nuts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbcaptiron Posted March 15, 2018 Report Share Posted March 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, noonereal said: I read the first sentence and howled in laughter then I came back and read your post and let go another belly laugh what is wrong with you conspiracy nuts? Sounds more like once you get past the first sentence you have ZERO retort.... Feel free to try again though....I'm sure everyone will give you a mulligan on that one... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.