Jump to content

Coronavirus Origin/Conspiracy only Thread


imaGoodBoyNow

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcQblThZZR1os8Ywbrn2qxqohSixNPIXFC20lDiYhgtDU5VC5-xHTt0KchO86zhiTR3TftKGPIMqiQ3UIdgvgSpBFnbVey_JRQwRqDM9HjMDlB04-bpXbanT9Q&usqp=CAY

image.thumb.png.d99f6cbe07b156ca562f28dc567f152c.png

The Post becomes the latest in a growing list of media outlets and ‘fact checkers’ that have been forced to walk back their insistence that the lab leak theory was an impossibility.

Last week, Facebook announced that it was reversing a policy that banned posts which claimed COVID-19 was “man-made” just months after asserting that the theory had been “debunked.”

Politifact was also forced to pull a ‘fact check’ that claimed it had “debunked” the lab leak origin theory of COVID-19.

-------------------------

Looks like your favorite fact-checkers are.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

When you take into consideration all of the factors it is definitely a high chance that it was a bio weapon created in a lab and purposely unleashed on the world. 

The world is gonna so pissed once their internet sleuths pick up the trail.

China probably should've just paid the tariffs until they had the chance to renegotiate a better deal. Unleashing the bio weapon on the world was a little shortsighted, if you ask me. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Troll said:

image.thumb.png.d99f6cbe07b156ca562f28dc567f152c.png

The Post becomes the latest in a growing list of media outlets and ‘fact checkers’ that have been forced to walk back their insistence that the lab leak theory was an impossibility.

Last week, Facebook announced that it was reversing a policy that banned posts which claimed COVID-19 was “man-made” just months after asserting that the theory had been “debunked.”

Politifact was also forced to pull a ‘fact check’ that claimed it had “debunked” the lab leak origin theory of COVID-19.

-------------------------

Looks like your favorite fact-checkers are.....

 

All these so-called “fact-checkers” have a political agenda, which makes their work nearly useless.  Does not mean we should ban them, we should laugh at them.  What is not funny is when they proceed to ban other people’s opinions, based on their own slanted world view.  The Left is making a serious miscalculation embracing this nonsense, but it shows how much they are actually authoritarians - while accusing everyone else of being fascists.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Belly Bob said:

The world is gonna so pissed once their internet sleuths pick up the trail.

China probably should've just paid the tariffs until they had the chance to renegotiate a better deal. Unleashing the bio weapon on the world was a little shortsighted, if you ask me. 

If you follow the timeline of events...

Their own lab doctors getting sick first,

and the lab shutting down first...

well...

logic "might" dictate,

that one would have to classify that as either truly accidental,

or some foreign attack/sabotage....

That is unless you are some conspiracy theorist,

who might think that China couldn't come up with some better excuse or distribution method,

than a false flag on themselves.

no?

🤔

 

PS: of course any "intended release" would always be made to look like an accident. 🤓

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Troll said:

If you follow the timeline of events...

Their own lab doctors getting sick first,

and the lab shutting down first...

well...

logic "might" dictate,

that one would have to classify that as either truly accidental,

or some foreign attack/sabotage....

That is unless you are some conspiracy theorist,

who might think that China couldn't come up with some better excuse or distribution method,

than a false flag on themselves.

no?

🤔

 

PS: of course any "intended release" would always be made to look like an accident. 🤓

 

We have to stop thinking about what China might or might not do (we do not know) and rather what they are capable of doing.  The former thinking got us thinking Japan would never attack Pearl Harbor - we forgot that they had the ability to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bormio said:

We have to stop thinking about what China might or might not do (we do not know) and rather what they are capable of doing.  The former thinking got us thinking Japan would never attack Pearl Harbor - we forgot that they had the ability to do so.

You think we shouldn't listen to china for guidance ?

Fauxi is going to be pretty upset about you not listening to his funded results...

🤷‍♂️

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2021 at 12:10 AM, Troll said:

WTF are you trying to twist up now?

Do you Know how many THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE

Were booted off of Youtube, Facebook, Twitter...

Losing money and business, socially exiled and publicly embarassed, etc etc.

You know....

For saying the EXACT SAME as Fauxi finally admitted ??? 

These are total lies.

From start to finish.

Especially the last point since Fauci didn't admit anything. He merely said it should be investigated.

And you wonder why people so rightly consider you a lying lunatic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

The irony here is truly epic.

The only thing that is not in dispute is that all my claims are 100% Anal Flinch motivated. <<FIFY 👍

Pssssst....

your Anus is 💩 Flinching yet again. 👍

 

PS: Still think yer azz is the best reference and resource ? 🤣

giphy.gif

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Wow.

Huge vindication!

😄

BTW: It's REALLY OK to say you were wrong....👍

REALLY !!! 👌

It IS fairly condemning of your favorite "fact check" checker opinons tho..

but no worries, when you figure out how wrong you are,

maybe you can eventually figure out who exactly had you fooled 👍

Hope this helps 👌

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ceased to be amazed at the standard employed by these people.

Merely opening a investigation is considered proof for their claims. Except of course if it's about something that they don't like. Then even definitive conclusions and/or convictions in court won't suffice (see Mueller Report).

Merely having a Benghazi investigation was vindication even if no wrongdoing was found. Merely having hearings about the fake IRS scandal was enough to prove they were right even if, again, no wrongdoing whatsoever had actually occurred.

And now Dr. Fauci merely saying there should be further investigation is sufficient even though no evidence actually exists, currently, to support their claims.

Somehow, the "left" covered it up despite the "left" now calling for an investigation.

There really is no reality in their world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

I ceased to be amazed at the standard employed by these people.

Merely opening a investigation is considered proof for their claims. Except of course if it's about something that they don't like. Then even definitive conclusions and/or convictions in court won't suffice (see Mueller Report).

Merely having a Benghazi investigation was vindication even if no wrongdoing was found. Merely having hearings about the fake IRS scandal was enough to prove they were right even if, again, no wrongdoing whatsoever had actually occurred.

And now Dr. Fauci merely saying there should be further investigation is sufficient even though no evidence actually exists, currently, to support their claims.

Somehow, the "left" covered it up despite the "left" now calling for an investigation.

There really is no reality in their world.

PSSSsssst .....

running off-topic

won't help you 👍

Benghazi LOLOL

Flinch 💩 flinch 👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

You think it's condemning for a fact-check site to deal with known facts.<<No I think it's funny you cannot accept that their "opinion masked as some fact-check" was proven wrong so they had to retract it 🤣

👌

There is no objective truth in my world. It's all Flinching, Anal expulsion, 💩 lies, agendas, etc. <<Truth 👍

Maybe you should try Benghazi again...🤣

giphy.gif

 

Flinch 💩 flinch 👌

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Atticus Finch said:

But, as usual with you, this is a lie.

🤷‍♂️

You must have missed it....

10 hours ago, Troll said:

image.thumb.png.d99f6cbe07b156ca562f28dc567f152c.png

The Post becomes the latest in a growing list of media outlets and ‘fact checkers’ that have been forced to walk back their insistence that the lab leak theory was an impossibility.

Last week, Facebook announced that it was reversing a policy that banned posts which claimed COVID-19 was “man-made” just months after asserting that the theory had been “debunked.”

Politifact was also forced to pull a ‘fact check’ that claimed it had “debunked” the lab leak origin theory of COVID-19.

-------------------------

Looks like your favorite fact-checkers are.....

 

Denial looks SOooooo good on you 🤣

giphy.gif

Flinch 💩 Flinch 👍

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good stuff from Francis Collins for those who are actually interested in honest, fact-based analysis (so not Troll, Nolebull813 and Bormio).

NIH Director: We Need an Investigation Into the Wuhan Lab-Leak Theory

“Far and away, the most likely origin is a natural zoonotic pathway from bats to some unidentified intermediate host to humans,” he told me. “But the possibility that such a naturally evolved virus might have also been under study at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and reached residents of Wuhan—and ultimately the rest of the world—as the result of a lab accident has never been adequately excluded.”

Collins was careful to qualify that the coronavirus is “absolutely not” man-made. “The genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 has a number of unanticipated features that are not consistent with what international experts would have expected from an emerging and dangerous coronavirus,” he told me. “Thus, the hypothesis that this was a human-engineered bioweapon is hard to support. It’s unfortunate that the lab-leak hypothesis has been muddled up with the intentional-bioweapon hypothesis in 16 months of tortured and politically driven rhetoric. That has given way too much credibility to the latter and not enough to the former.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said:

Good stuff from Francis Collins for those who are actually interested in honest, fact-based analysis 👍

NIH Director: as the result of a lab accident has never been adequately excluded.”

How many times would you like to prove yourself wrong ?? 🙄

Did you know Denial looks better with age ? 🤣

I'd say you wear it well again, 👍

but apparently you can't even do that right 😝

 

PS...nice anal flinch flatulence 💩

👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said:

 for those who are actually interested in honest, fact-based analysis ...

 

BTW: Quick question....

what kind of 💩 moron posts in a Coronavirus Origin/Conspiracy only Thread

...and tries to argue that THIS...

image.png.d889f2267e92b5c6a70675fd7ae6e7b5.png

...never happened 🤔

 

CLUE:

shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcQblThZZR1os8Ywbrn2qxqohSixNPIXFC20lDiYhgtDU5VC5-xHTt0KchO86zhiTR3TftKGPIMqiQ3UIdgvgSpBFnbVey_JRQwRqDM9HjMDlB04-bpXbanT9Q&usqp=CAY

🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...