Impeach 46!

[concha]

 

[RedZone]

1 hour ago, concha said:

 

You can't have a montage without AC/DC, crying' chuck....

 

[concha]

[Atticus Finch]

Imagine spending the entirety of the last 4 years championing Trump as an economic dynamo, lying about statistics, posting misleading figures, and then realizing that he was dead last in, well, everything.

I suspect what you'd do then is post about Fartboy Swalwell and link to Newsmax videos that whine about something that pundits said about Trump.

The Economy Does Much Better Under Democrats. Why?

[Nolebull813]

4 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

Imagine spending the entirety of the last 4 years championing Trump as an economic dynamo, lying about statistics, posting misleading figures, and then realizing that he was dead last in, well, everything.

I suspect what you'd do then is post about Fartboy Swalwell and link to Newsmax videos that whine about something that pundits said about Trump.

The Economy Does Much Better Under Democrats. Why?

Asshole. Posting links from the NYTimes is equivalent to stepping in shit and walking on brand new carpet. 

[Atticus Finch]

49 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

Asshole. Posting links from the NYTimes is equivalent to stepping in shit and walking on brand new carpet. 

The New York Times is merely reporting the factual economic data. It's true regardless of who reports it.

But keep flailing.

🤡

[Atticus Finch]

concha likely voted for #12 GDP growth and whined about #4, then voted for #13 and whined about #10, then voted for #14.

🤡

[Nolebull813]

39 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

The New York Times is merely reporting the factual economic data. It's true regardless of who reports it.

But keep flailing.

🤡

But you are the king of making fun of who said it, rather than what they are saying. The NYTimes has ZERO credibility with anyone that isn’t a partisan hack. Not one person with an ounce of intellect would look at that company as unbiased and fair. 
 

every single article about Trump was lies and hit pieces with made up sources that couldn’t be verified. literal tabloid lies with one intention was to smear Trump at all costs. And to also provide cover for democrat corruption. They are nothing more than an extension of the DNC. 
 

I can admit that Fox News leans right and highlights the democrat corruption because no one else in the media even wants that market outside of OAN and Newsmax. Fox News said if no one else will talk about the democrat corruption then we might as well because we have no competitors. That is why they are so successful. They never had to share that market until recently. 
 

but you are a hack that will lie and cover for media that fits your ideology

[Atticus Finch]

2 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

The NYTimes has ZERO credibility with anyone that isn’t a partisan hack.

You are free to look up all the data that the New York Times did. It's cold, hard and boring.

But you're too stupid and/or lazy to do that.

[Atticus Finch]

3 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

But you are the king of making fun of who said it, rather than what they are saying.

I will attack a source if it's the actual source. As in an article from The Federalist or Breitbart.

This is an example of the New York Times stating an undisputed fact and then asking experts and economists the question why?

[Atticus Finch]

4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

every single article about Trump was lies and hit pieces with made up sources that couldn’t be verified.

😄

[Nolebull813]

When it comes to media bias, it’s always a left winger that will lie  through their teeth about who’s bias and who isn’t. Who’s fake news, and who’s real journalism. 
 

if you say that CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT and a slew of others aren’t just Democrat lackeys carrying water for the DNC then you are just admitting to everyone that you are biased or completely clueless. You either are an intentional dumbass or unintentional dumbass but one things for sure you are a fucking dumbass

[Atticus Finch]

1 minute ago, Nolebull813 said:

if you say that CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT and a slew of others aren’t just Democrat lackeys carrying water for the DNC then you are just admitting to everyone that you are biased or completely clueless. You either are an intentional dumbass or unintentional dumbass but one things for sure you are a fucking dumbass

Even conservatives read the Washington Post and the New York Times. Just like liberals read the Wall Street Journal.

Because they're great newspapers.

But I'm conversing with someone who doesn't even understand what an op-ed page is.

[SeaShells21]

2 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

But you are the king of making fun of who said it, rather than what they are saying. The NYTimes has ZERO credibility with anyone that isn’t a partisan hack. Not one person with an ounce of intellect would look at that company as unbiased and fair. 
 

every single article about Trump was lies and hit pieces with made up sources that couldn’t be verified. literal tabloid lies with one intention was to smear Trump at all costs. And to also provide cover for democrat corruption. They are nothing more than an extension of the DNC. 
 

I can admit that Fox News leans right and highlights the democrat corruption because no one else in the media even wants that market outside of OAN and Newsmax. Fox News said if no one else will talk about the democrat corruption then we might as well because we have no competitors. That is why they are so successful. They never had to share that market until recently. 
 

but you are a hack that will lie and cover for media that fits your ideology

Just in case you were wondering, a lot of us are still waiting for Mr. Trump’s “gRaTe JoB” to handle the Coronavirus and make it go away.

I thought it was supposed to go away after the election but it didn’t listen.

Or maybe it will go away in April, when the warmer weather gets here. 

That’s April of last year.

 

Or we could just use the disinfectant that we inject into our bodies?

Or shine the powerful light at it.

 

I’m not trying to be mean but we are still waiting for the “GrAtE vIcToRy”. Unless, he was lying about that?

 

Mr. Trump Coronavirus talk:

 

 

Fox News contradicting itself:

 

More Mr. Trump Coronavirus talk:

 

Could you tell me what it is like to be a Trump supporter? It sounds so carefree and peaceful.

Scary and sometimes, alarming 🚨 but peaceful 😌

 

 

 

 

[concha]

6 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

Imagine spending the entirety of the last 4 years championing Trump as an economic dynamo, lying about statistics, posting misleading figures, and then realizing that he was dead last in, well, everything.

I suspect what you'd do then is post about Fartboy Swalwell and link to Newsmax videos that whine about something that pundits said about Trump.

The Economy Does Much Better Under Democrats. Why?

 

As regards Trump this is a leftist hit piece that is demonstrably dishonest to the core. Laughably so.

Trump did not inherit anything at all resembling a "boom" (as stated by the propagandist who wrote this article). 

GDP growth in the last 12-18 months of Obama's regime was slower than the average growth under Trump until Covid hit. This is a fact.  So if things at the end of Obama's reign were a "boom", what's the upgrade description for Trump-until-Covid? "Frenetic Boom"? 🤣

This clown is judging Trump on the effects of Covid, which decimated the economies of nearly every developed nation on earth.

Prior to Covid, America under Trump was enjoying historic low unemployment levels virtually across the board.

In the 12 months prior to Trump taking over the unemployment rate had dropped 0.1%. After Trump took over it dropped 7x amount in the same time. Unemployment then dropped to levels unseen since the 1960s.

Count on Andy to cheer a leftist propaganda piece dependent on a pandemic to attack a political opponent.

🤡

Andy = 💩

 

 

[Atticus Finch]

39 minutes ago, concha said:

As regards Trump this is a leftist hit piece that is demonstrably dishonest to the core. Laughably so.

Reporting jobs and GDP numbers = leftist hit piece

😄

[Atticus Finch]

40 minutes ago, concha said:

GDP growth in the last 12-18 months of Obama's regime was slower than the average growth under Trump until Covid hit. This is a fact.  So if things at the end of Obama's reign were a "boom", what's the upgrade description for Trump-until-Covid? "Frenetic Boom"? 🤣

It only cost a trillion dollars to get .2% higher growth.

Which to any reasonable person is a wash at best or, more accurately, a shell game.

[Atticus Finch]

41 minutes ago, concha said:

Count on Andy to cheer a leftist propaganda piece dependent on a pandemic to attack a political opponent.

"I'm an unrelenting clown who is wrong about everything!"

[concha]

38 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

It only cost a trillion dollars to get .2% higher growth.

Which to any reasonable person is a wash at best or, more accurately, a shell game.

 

Deficit spending and debt increase in Obama's last year was much higher than Trump's first year and yielded substantially lower growth. In fact, 2016 debt increase was more than in any year under Trump until Covid hit.

🤡

 

[concha]

43 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Reporting jobs and GDP numbers = leftist hit piece

😄

 

Excellent job refuting the facts I posted. 👍

🤣

 

[Troll]

19 hours ago, concha said:

How about

Chinese TEXAS oil ???

Now that Joey is in office....

News & Politics

Chinese Firm Shandong Xinchao Expands Its Foothold in Texas' Oil-Rich Permian Basin

 

By Bryan Preston Feb 01, 2021 4:33 PM ET

AP Feed

On Sunday, China’s Shandong Xinchao announced its decision to shell out $420 million to purchase oil-producing acreage from Grenadier Energy in the Texas Permian Basin.

Or rather, Surge Energy of Houston made the announcement via PR Newswire.

HOUSTON, Jan. 31, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Surge Energy US Holdings Company (“Surge Energy” or the “Company”) announced in the US that it, through its subsidiary, has signed a purchase and sale agreement to acquire leasehold interest and producing wells from Grenadier Energy Partners II LLC (“GEP II”) in Howard County, TX (the “Transaction”).  The aggregate purchase price of the Transaction is expected to be approximately $420 million USD.

Highlights of the acquired assets include:

• Average production of approximately 9,000 Boepd (approximately 75% oil)
• Approximately 18,010 net leasehold acres
• Operated inventory of approximately 120 high-quality, economic future drilling locations

The Transaction is expected to close in late first quarter.

Read the entire release and you’ll not see the words “Shandong Xinchao” in it. But Surge is that company’s creation and wholly owned subsidiary. That’s disclosed on Surge’s corporate website.

Surge Energy America was formed in early 2015 as a U.S. subsidiary of Chinese based Shandong Xinchao Energy Corporation Limited, a publicly traded company on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, with a strategy to make a significant acquisition in the U.S. oil shale play and pursue a long term sustainable U.S. oil & gas company. Upon entering into an agreement to purchase its first asset, Hoople Field, in early 2015, the Surge Energy organization began in May 2015 to enable taking over operatorship. Hoople Field is a 5,000 acre established water flood asset in Crosby County, TX.

Bloomberg published a brief piece about the deal but left Surge’s name out of it.

Since its creation in 2015, Surge Energy has continued to grow its in the Permian Basin. Before the COVID pandemic destroyed demand, ravaged the oil industry, and sent several producers into bankruptcy — and before this deal with Grenadier — Surge was already one of the top oil producers in Texas. After the Grenadier deal Surge Energy, aka Shandong Xinchao, will control about 111,000 acres of oil-producing land in Texas.

As of December 2020, Surge Energy was producing about 63,386 barrels per day according to data from the Texas Railroad Commission, ranking it 18th in production overall. The added production from the Grenadier purchase may push its ranking to as high as 15th.

China was the world’s largest oil importer pre-pandemic, producing about 5 million barrels per day while importing 8 million to match its consumption of about 13 million barrels per day. The United States at that time was the world’s largest oil producer, pumping between 11 and 12 million barrels per day. About 41% of U.S. oil is produced in Texas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency. Joe Biden promised not to ban fracking when he was running for president, but after inauguration he issued an executive order that effectively bans fracking on federal lands by halting leasing and permitting. His order will have little impact on Texas lands such as that purchased by Shandong Xinchao’s subsidiary, but will heavily impact states with large amounts of oil-producing federal lands such as New Mexico.

Bloomberg published a brief piece about the deal but left Surge’s name out of it.

Since its creation in 2015, Surge Energy has continued to grow its in the Permian Basin. Before the COVID pandemic destroyed demand, ravaged the oil industry, and sent several producers into bankruptcy — and before this deal with Grenadier — Surge was already one of the top oil producers in Texas. After the Grenadier deal Surge Energy, aka Shandong Xinchao, will control about 111,000 acres of oil-producing land in Texas.

As of December 2020, Surge Energy was producing about 63,386 barrels per day according to data from the Texas Railroad Commission, ranking it 18th in production overall. The added production from the Grenadier purchase may push its ranking to as high as 15th.

China was the world’s largest oil importer pre-pandemic, producing about 5 million barrels per day while importing 8 million to match its consumption of about 13 million barrels per day. The United States at that time was the world’s largest oil producer, pumping between 11 and 12 million barrels per day. About 41% of U.S. oil is produced in Texas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency. Joe Biden promised not to ban fracking when he was running for president, but after inauguration he issued an executive order that effectively bans fracking on federal lands by halting leasing and permitting. His order will have little impact on Texas lands such as that purchased by Shandong Xinchao’s subsidiary, but will heavily impact states with large amounts of oil-producing federal lands such as New Mexico.

----------------------------

Troops back to Afgan

American assets sold off to chinese

masa....

[Atticus Finch]

On 2/2/2021 at 5:56 PM, concha said:

Trump did not inherit anything at all resembling a "boom" (as stated by the propagandist who wrote this article). 

On January 20, 2017 nothing resembled a boom.

Got it.

You're a propagandist if you say otherwise.

👇

On 5/18/2017 at 6:45 PM, concha said:

GDP growth forecast to hit 4%.

Markets booming.

Unemployment continuing to decline.

Wages actually starting to grow.

May 18, 2017, though?

Booming.

🤡

[Atticus Finch]

On 2/2/2021 at 7:20 PM, concha said:

In fact, 2016 debt increase was more than in any year under Trump until Covid hit.

When concha says "in fact" then you know he's lying.

https://datalab.usaspending.gov/americas-finance-guide/deficit/trends/

And the projections even before COVID-19 had fiscal year 2020 deficit being higher than 2016 as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget#/media/File:U.S._Federal_Deficit_Stacked_Bar_Chart_-_2018_to_2027.png

[Atticus Finch]

On 2/2/2021 at 7:21 PM, concha said:

Excellent job refuting the facts I posted. 

 

Practically every fact you post is an actual lie.

[concha]

2 hours ago, Atticus Finch said:

On January 20, 2017 nothing resembled a boom.

Got it.

You're a propagandist if you say otherwise.

👇

May 18, 2017, though?

Booming.

🤡

 

This is soooooooooooooooooo weak even by your standards.

 

Note, Everyone, how Andy's retort to whether or not there is a booming economy uses DATES.  🤣

Not numbers/data.

Why?

Because the actual DATA proves me right.

By May of 2017, the first few months of Trump's residency, unemployment had dropped about half-a-point.  That is 5x the drop that happened in Obama's last YEAR.  Andy dodges this FACT. Because Andy is a turd. 💩

GDP growth was exceeding the last several quarters of Obama's presidency.

Interestingly, it was Andy who highlighted the only reference to the word "boom" that I actually mentioned in my post (from 2017 - he's such a fucking weirdo). The stock market went UP the better part of 1,000 points from Trump's inauguration to the middle of May, 2017.  If you go by the market immediately following Trump's election, the increase is about 3,000 points. 

 

Jesucristo, Andy, PLEASE STOP HUMILIATING YOURSELF.

🤡