Nolebull813 Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 25 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Yes ….. The next form of human eugenics has found some very fertile ground to work with... and in... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 5 minutes ago, Drummer61 said: She is one of the worst..... the comment was not directly related to her, (more of sciences take on the genetics) but.... ok....😀 I do agree, that I have little tolerance to those who abuse the system, on the backs of others .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 15, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 The chief of the Cherokee tribe has rebuked her political theatre. She is a fraud. A nasty p.o.s. Who is way out of touch with reality. Love looking at all the liberal kooks say she proved her Native American heritage with 1/1000th percent. I did the ancestry DNA test and have 14 percent of DNA traced back to the Iberian Peninsula in Spain. So now am I Hispanic? Do I like Soccer all of a sudden? Answer is no. I am cracker white and proud 😂 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 7 minutes ago, Drummer61 said: Troll, EW is a blame game advocate, a profound liar and above all, an unstable Marxist.... I'll take your word for it as I (thankfully) don't follow her.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: The chief of the Cherokee tribe has rebuked her political theatre. She is a fraud. A nasty p.o.s. Who is way out of touch with reality. Love looking at all the liberal kooks say she proved her Native American heritage with 1/1000th percent. I did the ancestry DNA test and have 14 percent of DNA traced back to the Iberian Peninsula in Spain. So now am I Hispanic? Do I like Soccer all of a sudden? Answer is no. I am cracker white and proud 😂 Native American DNA gets real tricky, especially when it comes to %. Much of what they know or think they can test from, generally comes from the mom's side..... and just because you have one parent at 100% does not mean your results would even be close to 50%.... I think the federal recognition level is somewhere right around your 13-14% range and states may differ... ALL TRIBES have their own membership requirements tho, and while many adopt the governmental 13-14% Many others are at 25% minimum and higher.... This is merely informational and not intended to support your exampled farce in any way.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zulu1128 Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 Clearly Trump should immediately release 1/1024th of his taxes. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 15, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 Man we are probably 1/1024th of everything!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bormio Posted October 15, 2018 Report Share Posted October 15, 2018 She is so frigging stupid, she thought this was a plus for her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 55 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said: Man we are probably 1/1024th of everything!!! Except gay. No straight, red blooded American male wants to go there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 33 minutes ago, ohio said: Except gay. No straight, red blooded American male wants to go there. Realist post of the day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Cherokee nation called her out. Basically called her a fraud which she is. She got absolutely exposed. Trump got her to expose herself to the world. And he certainly got the upper hand on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Apparently there is a NYT article showing that the average White American has 2x the Native American DNA that Fauxcahontas possesses... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSFBfan Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Just now, concha said: Apparently there is a NYT article showing that the average White American has 2x the Native American DNA that Fauxcahontas possesses... Yep there is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
concha Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolebull813 Posted October 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardcore Troubador Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 Is it inappropriate to start referring to her as a “Squaw”? Not sure why she went through all these hoops. Even if she didn’t have any Amerindian genes she could just “self-identify” as one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Sportsnut said: The basic racial and ethnic categories for Federal statistics and program administrative reporting are defined as follows: 1. American Indian or Alaskan Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North America, and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliations or community recognition. 2. Asian or Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands. This area includes, for example, China, India, Japan, Korea, the Philippine Islands, and Samoa. 3. Black. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. 4. Hispanic. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. 5. White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East No such measure as required % to be considered any ethnicity or race. Origins in ancestry is all that is required to claim any ethnicity or race. I guess we're all black after all, if the scientists are correct. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 26 minutes ago, Hardcore Troubador said: Is it inappropriate to start referring to her as a “Squaw”? Not sure why she went through all these hoops. Even if she didn’t have any Amerindian genes she could just “self-identify” as one. I haven't been able to figure this one out yet: the Left claims that a person's gender is determined by what the person identifies as, but not that person's ethnicity. I don't get it. It seems to me that it should work in both cases or in neither case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belly Bob Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Sportsnut said: The basic racial and ethnic categories for Federal statistics and program administrative reporting are defined as follows: 1. American Indian or Alaskan Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North America, and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliations or community recognition. 2. Asian or Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands. This area includes, for example, China, India, Japan, Korea, the Philippine Islands, and Samoa. 3. Black. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. 4. Hispanic. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. 5. White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East No such measure as required % to be considered any ethnicity or race. Origins in ancestry is all that is required to claim any ethnicity or race. I think @DevilDog would take umbrage at the criteria for being white. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted October 16, 2018 Report Share Posted October 16, 2018 2 hours ago, Sportsnut said: The basic racial and ethnic categories for Federal statistics and program administrative reporting are defined as follows: No such measure as required % to be considered any ethnicity or race.<<<for category 'reporting' purposes Origins in ancestry is all that is required to claim any ethnicity or race.<<<again for 'reporting' purposes... You must be googling...this is good, but you must be able to actually read what is written.....and dig a little deeper to get the entire picture... When it comes to any $, yes you will have to at some point, in proving membership affiliation to a tribal entity to the Federal Government to be Federally recognized (about 250 active tribes currently are not). This comes in the form of DNA for proof. This is paramount to many states giving their own recognition, and when it comes down to the $ beans as an example Michigan's threshold is set at 25% for free college for students (as hard written and not part of a jumbled process)... Yes, some people (or Universities) may on their own, be willing to accept 'self-identify' as having merit, but no.... The Federal Government simply does not work that way..... ...except maybe for 'reporting purposes'....🤣🤣 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.