"lock him up"...

[Troll]

15 minutes ago, NotBigdaddybloom said:

Agreed - as I’m finishing my caprese salad and glass of Chardonnay.

No demitasse with lemon peel to go with that language??? 🤣

heathen...lol

[DBP66]

50 minutes ago, Troll said:

and Not just the HEADLINE...try READING the content....

Here it is AGAIN with some highlights in red for you...

With Obama’s Approval, Russia Selling 130 Tons of Uranium to Iran

By JNS January 10, 2017 , 9:30 am

“Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.” Leviticus 19:11 (The Israel Bible™)

A billet of highly enriched uranium metal (US Dept. of Energy via Wikimedia)

FacebookTwitterEmailWhatsAppPrintShare2,134

The Obama administration and the rest of the signatories to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal have approved a shipment of 130 tons of natural uranium from Russia to Iran, rewarding the Islamic Republic for shipping 44 tons of heavy water it sent to Russia after exceeding the limit it could legally produce under the deal. Experts have told US media outlets the amount of uranium to be shipped is enough to produce 10 nuclear bombs.

The announcement of the new shipment is seen as one more last-minute jab from the Obama White House at incoming President Trump, who probably would have vetoed the shipment, even though, according to US diplomats speaking to the Associated Press and Fox News, the amount of uranium is within what’s allowable under the 2015 deal. Republican lawmakers have almost uniformly opposed that nuclear deal, arguing it awarded Iran too many concessions. The same lawmakers – which included the current Democratic Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (NY) – also argued the deal does not provide reliable verifications of Iran’s compliance.

Last month the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned that at current production levels Iran is going to exceed its cap on low-enriched uranium. Also, just a few days before the IAEA sounded the alarm, President Hassan Rouhani ordered Iran’s nuclear agency to develop nuclear engines that would use uranium enriched to 20 percent – a clear violation of the 2015 deal allowing Iran to enrich only to 3.67 percent.

[ubm_premium banners=171 count=1]

In late December 2016, the IAEA published documents showing Iran was given exemptions allowing it to stockpile uranium in excess of the 300 kilogram limit set by the nuclear deal. The agreements had been kept secret for almost a year, and were publicized only because the Trump administration indicated it was planning to go public with them.

But when, on September 1, 2016, the Institute for Science and International Security announced that the US and its co-signatories were considering awarding Iran further exemptions to Iran’s cap of 300 kg of low enriched uranium, State Dept. Spokesperson John Kirby denied the report, saying, “Well, we’ve read the report. I’ve looked at it myself. What I can tell you is that Iran’s nuclear commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) have not changed. There’s been no moving of the goal post, as it were.”

🙈🙈🙈

🤡

 

BTW....speaking of moving goalposts...what ever happened to 

HMMMMMM???

🤡

and the rest of the signatories to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal...🤡

[Troll]

9 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

and the rest of the signatories to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal...🤡

is a far cry from...

1 hour ago, DBP66 said:

...and how or why are we involved in this? No uranium left the U.S..

and I guessed you missed....

4 hours ago, Troll said:

So if ANY of this is incorrect propaganda....please show which one(s) if any of the 3 are incorrect.....I looked for any left wing propaganda that addresses this and NADA...

But you must have some.....

all ears....enlighten us

 

 

[NotBigdaddybloom]

22 minutes ago, Troll said:

No demitasse with lemon peel to go with that language??? 🤣

heathen...lol

Nope, but a little jalapeño adds just the right kick!

[I AM IRONMAN]

It's a known fact that clear facts fly right over 🤡🐑's head.  Curly is a straight up moron!

[NotBigdaddybloom]

46 minutes ago, Troll said:

No demitasse with lemon peel to go with that language??? 🤣

heathen...lol

 

[Slotback Right]

15 hours ago, DBP66 said:

he asked them to investigate Biden...his political opponent...while he was holding TAXPAYER money from them that Congress appropriated for them...and the transcript confirms that.. "I need you to do me a favor"....and if you don't you're not getting any $$...and he didn't release the money until 9-11-19..when the story of the whistle blower was breaking...he got caught in a whooper of a lie and it may cost him his job..when your the leader of our country and ask a foreign country to interfere in our election you need to pack you bags and go hide in disgrace IMO...he's a traitor...in every sense of the word....while his clown posse wave American flags and cheer him on..SAD times in America...

First of all, Biden is not Trump's opponent...at least not yet. Second, it was Biden who is on tape withholding TAXPAYER money from them unless they fire the guy investigating his son. Third, the fact that Biden is running for president, does not make him above the law, or immune to investigation. The fact that Biden was dumb enough to do so with a skeleton like that in his closet, is his problem. 

I stand by what I said. Trump did not withhold any money, and the favor Trump asked for has not been done. And that favor related to alleged misconduct by Biden before Trump was ever president. 

[I AM IRONMAN]

5 minutes ago, Slotback Right said:

First of all, Biden is not Trump's opponent...at least not yet. Second, it was Biden who is on tape withholding TAXPAYER money from them unless they fire the guy investigating his son. Third, the fact that Biden is running for president, does not make him above the law, or immune to investigation. The fact that Biden was dumb enough to do so with a skeleton like that in his closet, is his problem. 

I stand by what I said. Trump did not withhold any money, and the favor Trump asked for has not been done. And that favor related to alleged misconduct by Biden before Trump was ever president. 

🤡🐑 is too ignorant and stupid to comprehend because Lemon and Maddow didn't spoon feed this info to him...such a silly 🤡🐑.. bless his dumbass heart.

[Blueliner]

34 minutes ago, NotBigdaddybloom said:

 

This is the only thing more hilarious than this sham, BS, in-American impeachment inquiry nonsense🤣 ....or is it the other way around 🤣

[Slotback Right]

7 hours ago, HSFBfan said:

From Rand Paul

It is being reported that the whistleblower was Joe Biden’s point man on Ukraine. It is imperative the whistleblower is subpoenaed and asked under oath about Hunter Biden and corruption

Very interesting. Perhaps he (the so-called whistle blower) is worried about his own ass if Biden's actions are shown to be improper and/or illegal. Hmm.

[Bormio]

If no GOP House members voted to proceed with an inquiry, how many do you think will vote to actually impeach or how many GOP Senators do you think will vote to remove?  The easy aye vote was on an inquiry.  Impeachment is badly underwater in the battleground states - NY and California are meaningless.  And the Democrats are making a case on the weakest of impeachment cases - the nebulous abuse of power case with no clear cut criminal allegation.  They are going to lose and they know it - it is all Kabuki now.

[Troll]

4 minutes ago, Bormio said:

If no GOP House members voted to proceed with an inquiry, how many do you think will vote to actually impeach or how many GOP Senators do you think will vote to remove?  The easy aye vote was on an inquiry.  Impeachment is badly underwater in the battleground states - NY and California are meaningless.  And the Democrats are making a case on the weakest of impeachment cases - the nebulous abuse of power case with no clear cut criminal allegation.  They are going to lose and they know it - it is all Kabuki now.

With the senate as a firewall, all the squealing and square dancing in the basement is just a futile exercise...

Kind of like that whole Mueller thingy 💩

remember that one?

But this time, this one is super "special"......

It's all for "show" …..yet no one gets to 'see'....🙄

 

[Slotback Right]

32 minutes ago, Bormio said:

If no GOP House members voted to proceed with an inquiry, how many do you think will vote to actually impeach or how many GOP Senators do you think will vote to remove?  The easy aye vote was on an inquiry.  Impeachment is badly underwater in the battleground states - NY and California are meaningless.  And the Democrats are making a case on the weakest of impeachment cases - the nebulous abuse of power case with no clear cut criminal allegation.  They are going to lose and they know it - it is all Kabuki now.

Nanci and the Dems, for months, have been hoping to peel off Republicans from the President, so that it would appear to be a bipartisan effort to remove him. The fact that she got ZERO Republicans on this relatively inconsequential impeachment rules vote, has to have hammered the last nail in that coffin. It is a partisan inquisition, and now everyone can see that. The coup is doomed.

[DBP66]

9 hours ago, Slotback Right said:

First of all, Biden is not Trump's opponent...at least not yet...look again..yes he was his opponent at the time. Second, it was Biden who is on tape withholding TAXPAYER money from them unless they fire the guy investigating his son...this was done in conjunction with our European allies because their A.G. at the time was corrupt and wasn't investigating corruption in his own country...that's why the US and our allies insisted he be fired...it had nothing to do with Biden son and this has been de-bunked many times.."fake news" Third, the fact that Biden is running for president, does not make him above the law, or immune to investigation. The fact that Biden was dumb enough to do so with a skeleton like that in his closet, is his problem...Biden's son and his connection to the gas company has been investigated too..and nothing has been found..let's see what Barr comes up with.

I stand by what I said. Trump did not withhold any money, and the favor Trump asked for has not been done. And that favor related to alleged misconduct by Biden before Trump was ever president. ...the money was appropriated by Congress in the spring...Trump spoke with their Pres. in April (have no clue what that ca;ll was about but I'm sure it will come out in the wash) and who knows what was said but no money was sent at the time...the July call comes and we still didn't send them money the desperately needed to fight the Russians?? (I'm sure Putin enjoyed watching the money staying in Washington and not used against his forces)...hummm...then when the story of the whistle blower was breaking (9-11-19) we send them their money that day??!!...coincidence??...LOL..yea sure it is..if you watch Fox news and baaalieve a certified liar it is...but if you have common sense you know the money was held up because they didn't do what Trump requested...don't need to be a rocket scientist to put this one together...and add in the testimony of those who just testified and the confirm that's what happened..WE DID WITHHOLD THE $$$...😟

 

[thc6795]

11 hours ago, DBP66 said:

yes it does make it alright...because they were complying with the agreement...read the article...f*in moron...🤡

Serioulsy fucking kill yourself. You wont be fucking missed by anyone. 

[thc6795]

11 hours ago, DBP66 said:

you must post about me about a dozen times a day mam?!?...time to find someone else to stalk...😧

fucking classic

[thc6795]

10 hours ago, Troll said:

is a far cry from...

and I guessed you missed....

this fucking idiot went from "no uranium left the US" to "yeah but who signed the deal" fucking moron 

[DBP66]

3 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

this fucking idiot went from "no uranium left the US" to "yeah but who signed the deal" fucking moron 

and no uranium did leave the US Tex...🤡

[DBP66]

8 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

Serioulsy fucking kill yourself. You wont be fucking missed by anyone. 

go get your tumble weeds and make yourself useful...dumb ass red neck...🤡

[Troll]

12 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

this fucking idiot went from "no uranium left the US" to "yeah but who signed the deal" fucking moron 

11 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

and no uranium did leave the US Tex...🤡

[I AM IRONMAN]

Those that lie need to have excellent memories right 🤡🐑?

[thc6795]

19 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

go get your tumble weeds and make yourself useful...dumb ass red neck...🤡

go do what you were told boy.

[DBP66]

1 hour ago, Troll said:

Exaggerated post connects Clintons, Russia, uranium deal

By Daniel Funke on Monday, October 28th, 2019 at 4:30 p.m.

 

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally in Detroit on Nov. 4, 2016. (AP)

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading claims about Clinton’s relationship with Russia. 

One post published Oct. 21 and shared more than 1,300 times says the following:

"Does anyone else find it strange: The same woman who paid for a Russian dossier to win an election; Whose husband made $500k for a Russian speech; Who sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia; Whose foundation received $150M from Russia; Keeps calling others Russian assets?"

The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

As evidence, the post cited Charlie Kirk, founder of the conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA. We found an Oct. 20 tweet from Kirk that makes the same claims as the post. It was retweeted more than 26,000 times.

(Screenshot from Facebook)

PolitiFact has investigated four of these claims in the past.

We summarized our findings to address each of the post’s claims. The post contains a hint of truth, but it paints an inaccurate picture of Clinton’s ties to Russia.

Hillary Clinton "paid for a Russian dossier to win an election"

This contains an element of truth, but it isn’t the full picture.

The dossier that the Facebook post is referencing was written by former British spy Christopher Steele about President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. Many of the details included in the dossier were salacious but unverified. It was not written by Russian officials, as the Facebook post seems to claim.

In September 2018, we fact-checked a claim from Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., about the dossier, Fusion GPS (the opposition research firm that created it) and how the Clinton campaign was involved. We found that Fusion GPS was hired to work on behalf of the Clinton campaign, but the firm was already investigating Trump at the time.

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia.

Bill Clinton "made $500k for a Russian speech"

This is accurate. The source of the claim is the 2015 book "Clinton Cash" by author and political consultant Peter Schweizer. During an April 2015 interview about the book on Fox News Sunday, he said something that caught our eye: "Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state."

We rated that claim True. And in the course of our investigation of Clinton’s federal financial disclosure forms, we found that former President Clinton gave a talk in 2010 to a Russian finance corporation. He was compensated $500,000.

Hillary Clinton "sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia"

This is misleading. We rated a similar claim Mostly False.

The claim also stems from Schweizer’s "Clinton Cash." A chapter of the book suggests a pay-for-play scheme between the Clintons and Russia, accusing them of transferring uranium in exchange for donation money.

Part of that chapter stems from a 2007 deal between Clinton Foundation board member Frank Giustra’s company, UrAsia, and Uranium One, a Canadian mining company. Uranium One has mines, mills and land in U.S. states equal to about 20% of the American uranium production capacity. Its actual production, though, is a smaller portion of the uranium produced in the United States, at 11% in 2014, according to Oilprice.com.

In 2009, Russia’s nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, bought a 17% share of Uranium One. A year later, it bought enough shares to give it a 51% stake.

Since a foreign entity was taking a majority stake in a uranium operation, several U.S. government regulators had to approve the deal. They did, and in 2013, Russia assumed 100% ownership of Uranium One and renamed it Uranium One Holding.

In our previous fact-check, we noted that Clinton sat on the committee that approved the sale — but the decision was not hers alone. She also did not have the power to veto the committee’s decision.

[15yds4gibberish]

17 hours ago, thc6795 said:

Wd you care to wager this impeachment goes no where and President Trump will be re-elected?

Why would I bet a dime that depends on Republicans to suddenly develop a conscience or capacity for shame?

[NotBigdaddybloom]

3 hours ago, DBP66 said:

Exaggerated post connects Clintons, Russia, uranium deal

By Daniel Funke on Monday, October 28th, 2019 at 4:30 p.m.

 

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally in Detroit on Nov. 4, 2016. (AP)

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading claims about Clinton’s relationship with Russia. 

One post published Oct. 21 and shared more than 1,300 times says the following:

"Does anyone else find it strange: The same woman who paid for a Russian dossier to win an election; Whose husband made $500k for a Russian speech; Who sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia; Whose foundation received $150M from Russia; Keeps calling others Russian assets?"

The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

As evidence, the post cited Charlie Kirk, founder of the conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA. We found an Oct. 20 tweet from Kirk that makes the same claims as the post. It was retweeted more than 26,000 times.

(Screenshot from Facebook)

PolitiFact has investigated four of these claims in the past.

We summarized our findings to address each of the post’s claims. The post contains a hint of truth, but it paints an inaccurate picture of Clinton’s ties to Russia.

Hillary Clinton "paid for a Russian dossier to win an election"

This contains an element of truth, but it isn’t the full picture.

The dossier that the Facebook post is referencing was written by former British spy Christopher Steele about President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. Many of the details included in the dossier were salacious but unverified. It was not written by Russian officials, as the Facebook post seems to claim.

In September 2018, we fact-checked a claim from Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., about the dossier, Fusion GPS (the opposition research firm that created it) and how the Clinton campaign was involved. We found that Fusion GPS was hired to work on behalf of the Clinton campaign, but the firm was already investigating Trump at the time.

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia.

Bill Clinton "made $500k for a Russian speech"

This is accurate. The source of the claim is the 2015 book "Clinton Cash" by author and political consultant Peter Schweizer. During an April 2015 interview about the book on Fox News Sunday, he said something that caught our eye: "Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state."

We rated that claim True. And in the course of our investigation of Clinton’s federal financial disclosure forms, we found that former President Clinton gave a talk in 2010 to a Russian finance corporation. He was compensated $500,000.

Hillary Clinton "sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia"

This is misleading. We rated a similar claim Mostly False.

The claim also stems from Schweizer’s "Clinton Cash." A chapter of the book suggests a pay-for-play scheme between the Clintons and Russia, accusing them of transferring uranium in exchange for donation money.

Part of that chapter stems from a 2007 deal between Clinton Foundation board member Frank Giustra’s company, UrAsia, and Uranium One, a Canadian mining company. Uranium One has mines, mills and land in U.S. states equal to about 20% of the American uranium production capacity. Its actual production, though, is a smaller portion of the uranium produced in the United States, at 11% in 2014, according to Oilprice.com.

In 2009, Russia’s nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, bought a 17% share of Uranium One. A year later, it bought enough shares to give it a 51% stake.

Since a foreign entity was taking a majority stake in a uranium operation, several U.S. government regulators had to approve the deal. They did, and in 2013, Russia assumed 100% ownership of Uranium One and renamed it Uranium One Holding.

In our previous fact-check, we noted that Clinton sat on the committee that approved the sale — but the decision was not hers alone. She also did not have the power to veto the committee’s decision.

She was Secretary of State for god’s sake! What do you mean she couldn’t veto!!! She sure as hell didn’t vote no! 
 

You lying assholes would hang this President from the highest tree if anyone in his administration had done this!

Hell your ilk are trying to impeach him for words that he spoke!!! But hey, snopes says it was all good that Hillary and obama made it possible for a sworn enemy of the United States of America to receive 20% of our Uranium.