Jump to content

Another fun filled weekend in Chicago


rockinl

Recommended Posts

On 8/4/2021 at 8:03 AM, badrouter said:

I'm talking about discourse in general, meaning media, social media, discussion forums and social gatherings. In left-leaning circles, suggesting that ideas and attitudes (often referred to as "culture", but I think use of this word is a mistake) encouraging being violent and using guns have much to do with the frequency of gun violence, is prohibited. For example, we are not allowed to suggest that much of the music with widespread popularity which glamorizes violence-including against women- is a negative but significant influence.  We're not allowed to point out the frequency with which urban youth post to social media comments about, and pictures of, guns. Certainly not to point out the fact that this may be evidence of popularity of, and tendency to, rely on guns by people in urban communities. Discussion of these things is prohibited, presumably, because of "the optics" which may harm political campaigns. We're not to "blame the victim", or "sound like we're making right-wing talking points". So, our tribe can't address it *AT ALL* in public discussions.

Someone like myself makes the points I make above, and right-wingers applaud. But, ANY talk of the insanity of the amount of guns on the streets, and of the need for *national* laws to curtail the prevalence of guns is prohibited. Absolutely no discussion of tightening gun laws and getting guns out of some people's hands is allowed. Discussion of these things is prohibited, presumably because of "the optics" which may harm political campaigns. We're not to "attack the 2nd amendment", or "sound like we're making leftist talking points". So, our tribe can't address it *AT ALL* in public discussions.

What happens in political campaigns is a result of several factors which vary by location. Virtually all of the elections have less than half of the electorate voting in the first place. And, the overwhelming majority of the minority of the electorate actually voting are EXTREMELY low information voters. Even those often not counted as low information voters have an extremely rudimentary understanding of both the candidates and the issues. An absolutely minuscule percentage of voters genuinely understand the candidates and the issues with any sort of accuracy or depth. And all of that helps explain the debased nature of discourse described above.

As with virtually everything else relative to our national problems along with other parts of the world, it all gets down to the $$$$.

I strongly recommend for everyone on the board ( in fact anyone who really cares about how we live in America ) to get or download a copy of " BLOOD   GUN   MONEY" by Ioan Grillo. While not as "in depth" several of his U-tube videos are worth a watch.

This is not a "left or right" fueled problem but only fed by GREED... and the only way to reduce our gun problem is to actually get involved and really focus on learning the "behind the scenes" activity of deals made in congress.

There is not one logical reason why this problem cannot be reduced in a major way while still allowing responsible Americans to have guns.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Reparations and begin the healing process. 
 

bgw

What kind of reparations? How much to each person? For how long? Do we return to "racist capitalism" after? Or something else? What does the something else look like?

You should understand none of the above will ever happen without first answering those questions, and in a way our democratic society agrees with. Radicals always fail when they demand we destroy all the things they don't like without offering detailed replacements/alternatives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, badrouter said:

What kind of reparations? How much to each person? For how long? Do we return to "racist capitalism" after? Or something else? What does the something else look like?

You should understand none of the above will ever happen without first answering those questions, and in a way our democratic society agrees with. Radicals always fail when they demand we destroy all the things they don't like without offering detailed replacements/alternatives. 

Well, going by the Accra Accord in 1996….trillions adjust for inflation. Of course adjust for current valuation. 
 

It’s not “rocket science “ Router…. Indigenous natives and incarcerated Japanese Americans received reparations of some sort. 
 

bgw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Well, going by the Accra Accord in 1996….trillions adjust for inflation. Of course adjust for current valuation. 
 

It’s not “rocket science “ Router…. Indigenous natives and incarcerated Japanese Americans received reparations of some sort. 
 

bgw

As they should have.

Trigger warning: You've never been a slave. And neither has any living member of your family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

What fucking difference does it make, what’s right is right and we as a nation calling out others for human rights abuses is bullshit. 
 

Fucking vagina. 
 

bgw

The human rights violations committed by governments today are the lockdowns, closing of schools etc. Not slavery for black people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Won’t dignify stupidity but in your case…

Hey stupid ass, anything in there , at all?

Lol…. NoBalls actually thinks he has an argument. 
 

BTW the reparations bill is in the system. 
 

bgw

If you can’t answer simple questions like who is paying for it and who gets paid then it sounds like you have no case at all. Just virtue signaling. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2021 at 11:03 AM, badrouter said:

We're not to "blame the victim", or "sound like we're making right-wing talking points". So, our tribe can't address it *AT ALL* in public discussions.

Doesn't this reply count in favor of @badrouter's point?

👇

On 8/4/2021 at 3:00 PM, BUFORDGAWOLVES said:

Oh shit, didn’t take long for the old “I know of Black folks” diatribe to come shooting out of Klan asses.

Fucking morons. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2021 at 2:09 PM, Atticus Finch said:

You're talking about the symptom and not the cause.

Symptoms are typically effects of underlying causes. And effects can themselves be causes.

If A causes B and B causes C, then B is both an effect and a cause.

If we want to avoid C, it often makes more sense to focus on B rather than A. It might be better, all things considered, to focus on moral education rather than (say) implicit bias training or defunding the police or anti-racism education etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Belly Bob said:

What if we cut welfare and used that money for reparations?

Would that solve the problem?

What if we raze it the ground and start over, maybe go back to Cain and Abel or the Garden of Eve?

What if….. hmmmnnn. 
 

The US is not lacking, at all…. And it does not have to be at the expense of the taxpayers. 
 

bgw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...