DOJ to unseal Mar-A-Lago warrant

[I AM IRONMAN]

Ok….going in circles…..time to end this thread

[AztecPadre]

2 hours ago, Blueliner said:

The fucking leak was made up and YOU KNOW IT. If you made this bet with a bookie and refused to pay, they’d come and break your fucking legs. Stop being a little bitch and pay up. Damn. 

Dang, still all that anger.  Lol.  Make a New Years resolution to be happier in 2023.  Life is much better that way.  Carry on.

[GoBigBlack]

7 minutes ago, Blueliner said:

Fine. Don’t pay him. But do Warrior a solid and at least change your username to GoBigWelcher. 

Help him out then and answer the question for him. How does the following prove there was zero nuclear information being held by Donald Trump —

 

“That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said,” the report continued. “FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.”

“Agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents,” the report continued.

The Bezos-owned newspaper previously reported that former President Trump was storing documents pertaining to “nuclear secrets,” citing two anonymous sources familiar with the investigation.”

[Warrior]

43 minutes ago, Blueliner said:

Fine. Don’t pay him. But do Warrior a solid and at least change your username to GoBigWelcher. 

Would be more accurate 

[Blueliner]

19 minutes ago, AztecPadre said:

Dang, still all that anger.  Lol.  Make a New Years resolution to be happier in 2023.  Life is much better that way.  Carry on.

You’re right actually, and I agree with ya. I always pray that I can just let it all go. Live the chill life (which I actually do for the most part). But it’s hard to unsee what you've seen. At least for me it is. 

[Warrior]

47 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said:

Help him out then and answer the question for him. How does the following prove there was zero nuclear information being held by Donald Trump —

 

 

“That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said,” the report continued. “FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.”

“Agents and prosecutors found no discernible business interest in the Mar-a-Lago documents,” the report continued.

The Bezos-owned newspaper previously reported that former President Trump was storing documents pertaining to “nuclear secrets,” citing two anonymous sources familiar with the investigation.”

I really can’t comprehend how this is so difficult for you to grasp. The report outlines different sources of the findings during the raid and reported by the FBI. Not one single source, report or leak not coming out makes any mention of nuclear anything. Nothing. Previously, the without any verification just leaks nuclear information was supposedly found. 
 

It’s called the process of elimination- do you really believe for one second if there was anything to do with nuclear docs found it wouldn’t be in the report or leaked by anyone to at least counter this reporting? It served it’s purpose as a hit job before an election and you’re to thick in the head or cheap to admit you lost a bet.

 

[DBP66]

Foreign nuclear secrets among docs found in Trump raid: report

By 

Jesse O’Neill

September 7, 2022 12:19am 

 Updated

In a stunning leak from the Department of Justice, a report on Tuesday disclosed information about top secret documents that were reportedly among the files seized by FBI agents at Donald Trump’s Florida resort last month.

Citing sources “familiar with the search,” the Washington Post said the documents detailed a foreign government’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities and can only be viewed by a select group of top officials.

The disclosure was published Tuesday, a day after the former president’s legal team won a request for a special master to review the documents over his lawyers’ concerns that the feds would “impugn, leak, and publicize select aspects of their investigation.”

The foreign government described concerns about the documents found at the resort, as 25 of them were marked “top secret.” US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/AFP via Pages from the order granting a request by former President Donald Trump’s legal team to appoint a special master to review documents seized by the FBI during a search of his Mar-a-Lago estate. AP The documents seized from Mar-a-Lago reportedly included files listing a foreign government’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities. REUTERS

The foreign government described in the highly sensitive documents was not revealed by the sources, but the news reportedly heightened concerns about the more than 100 classified documents found at the property and hundreds of others recovered from Mar-a-Lago — some of which detail top-secret US operations that even senior national security officers were not aware of, according to the report.

Some special-access programs detailed in the documents were only authorized to be viewed by the president, some cabinet members and a couple dozen other government employees on a need-to-know basis, the article said.

Those especially sensitive records should have been kept under lock and key in a secure compound with a control officer keeping tabs on them, not in the former president’s private club under unknown security, according to the article.

 

[GoBigBlack]

31 minutes ago, Warrior said:

I really can’t comprehend how this is so difficult for you to grasp. The report outlines different sources of the findings during the raid and reported by the FBI. Not one single source, report or leak not coming out makes any mention of nuclear anything. Nothing. Previously, the without any verification just leaks nuclear information was supposedly found. 
 

It’s called the process of elimination- do you really believe for one second if there was anything to do with nuclear docs found it wouldn’t be in the report or leaked by anyone to at least counter this reporting? It served it’s purpose as a hit job before an election and you’re to thick in the head or cheap to admit you lost a bet.

 

Where did you post “the report”?

[Warrior]

39 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

Foreign nuclear secrets among docs found in Trump raid: report

By 

Jesse O’Neill

September 7, 2022 12:19am 

 Updated

In a stunning leak from the Department of Justice, a report on Tuesday disclosed information about top secret documents that were reportedly among the files seized by FBI agents at Donald Trump’s Florida resort last month.

Citing sources “familiar with the search,” the Washington Post said the documents detailed a foreign government’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities and can only be viewed by a select group of top officials.

The disclosure was published Tuesday, a day after the former president’s legal team won a request for a special master to review the documents over his lawyers’ concerns that the feds would “impugn, leak, and publicize select aspects of their investigation.”

The foreign government described concerns about the documents found at the resort, as 25 of them were marked “top secret.” US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/AFP via Pages from the order granting a request by former President Donald Trump’s legal team to appoint a special master to review documents seized by the FBI during a search of his Mar-a-Lago estate. AP The documents seized from Mar-a-Lago reportedly included files listing a foreign government’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities. REUTERS

The foreign government described in the highly sensitive documents was not revealed by the sources, but the news reportedly heightened concerns about the more than 100 classified documents found at the property and hundreds of others recovered from Mar-a-Lago — some of which detail top-secret US operations that even senior national security officers were not aware of, according to the report.

Some special-access programs detailed in the documents were only authorized to be viewed by the president, some cabinet members and a couple dozen other government employees on a need-to-know basis, the article said.

Those especially sensitive records should have been kept under lock and key in a secure compound with a control officer keeping tabs on them, not in the former president’s private club under unknown security, according to the article.

 

You’re making my point from September when all the leaks hit the wire and reported repeatedly everywhere just before the election. Show me anything in the last 30 days verifying nuclear anything from the raid. 
 

You boys were played like a fiddle once again. 

[Warrior]

35 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said:

Where did you post “the report”?

Look up the Washington post story I’ve posted.

This nuclear story was on every network and news outlet when this broke for about a week. Now silence- wonder why?

[DBP66]

46 minutes ago, Warrior said:

You’re making my point from September when all the leaks hit the wire and reported repeatedly everywhere just before the election. Show me anything in the last 30 days verifying nuclear anything from the raid. 
 

You boys were played like a fiddle once again. 

it was Sept. because he got caught with the top-secret files in August...see how that works?...and why would a story from 4 months ago be in the news in the last 30 days??...wtf??....pay the man...you lost...🙄

[DBP66]

49 minutes ago, Warrior said:

Look up the Washington post story I’ve posted.

This nuclear story was on every network and news outlet when this broke for about a week. Now silence- wonder why?

because it's 4 months later?!?!....🤡

 

 

[Warrior]

9 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

because it's 4 months later?!?!....🤡

 

 

And gone - the story served it’s purpose. 

[Warrior]

12 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

it was Sept. because he got caught with the top-secret files in August...see how that works?...and why would a story from 4 months ago be in the news in the last 30 days??...wtf??....pay the man...you lost...🙄

He wasn’t caught with anything, a story was leaked in Sept and now it’s gone, never to heard from again. The story did its job. 

[DBP66]

1 minute ago, Warrior said:

And gone - the story served it’s purpose. 

stories are gone the next day...this is 4 months later champ....pay the man...you lost....🙄

[DBP66]

1 minute ago, Warrior said:

He wasn’t caught with anything, a story was leaked in Sept and now it’s gone, never to heard from again. The story did its job. 

it's 4 months later champ?!?...🙄

[GoBigBlack]

1 hour ago, Warrior said:

Look up the Washington post story I’ve posted.

This nuclear story was on every network and news outlet when this broke for about a week. Now silence- wonder why?

What is “the report”? The FBI report? The first WaPo report? The second WaPo report? Your conspiracy “news” site “report”? Minority report? Which one are you saying we can use process of elimination on to determine there was no nuclear information? Post that one, please. 

[DBP66]

3 minutes ago, Warrior said:

He wasn’t caught with anything, a story was leaked in Sept and now it’s gone, never to heard from again. The story did its job. 

so he wasn't caught with anything now??...the whole story is B.S.??......🙄

[Warrior]

1 minute ago, DBP66 said:

so he wasn't caught with anything now??...the whole story is B.S.??......🙄

No nuclear docs have been confirmed by anyone. Just leaks - prove me wrong.

[Warrior]

4 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said:

What is “the report”? The FBI report? The first WaPo report? The second WaPo report? Your conspiracy “news” site “report”? Minority report? Which one are you saying we can use process of elimination on to determine there was no nuclear information? Post that one, please. 

Spin all you want, show me the report from Aug of nuclear docs -not hearsay or sources say, confirmed Nuclear docs found? It never happened, do you want to know why? I’m sure you don’t but news flash - the reason it’s never been confirmed is the leak was a lie. That was the bet. 
 

Leak was never confirmed because you can’t confirm a lie. The whole story was a lie. You lose. 

[Warrior]

That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.

Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.

[GoBigBlack]

13 minutes ago, Warrior said:

Spin all you want, show me the report from Aug of nuclear docs -not hearsay or sources say, confirmed Nuclear docs found? It never happened, do you want to know why? I’m sure you don’t but news flash - the reason it’s never been confirmed is the leak was a lie. That was the bet. 
 

Leak was never confirmed because you can’t confirm a lie. The whole story was a lie. You lose. 

You can’t confirm a lie? What the fuck are you talking about? I guess Bill Clinton didn’t have sexual relations with that woman because it’s never been confirmed! Jesus… you can’t make this shit up.

So, you don’t have a report that proves there was no nuclear information involved? Yeah, I know that because it has not been confirmed either way yet. We have no more relevant information than we did when the bet was made There’s literally not even anything to spin. 

[GoBigBlack]

8 minutes ago, Warrior said:

That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.

Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.

So, he had nuclear info and wasn’t using it for a business advantage. It’s so obviously clear what that says. You lose. Pay up. 🙄

 

[Warrior]

15 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said:

You can’t confirm a lie? What the fuck are you talking about? I guess Bill Clinton didn’t have sexual relations with that woman because it’s never been confirmed! Jesus… you can’t make this shit up.

So, you don’t have a report that proves there was no nuclear information involved? Yeah, I know that because it has not been confirmed either way yet. We have no more relevant information than we did when the bet was made There’s literally not even anything to spin. 

Clinton left his load on the blue dress that Monica Kept. You’re a moron.

The report is about what was found with no mention of nuclear docs. When you write a report you don’t write about what wasn’t found.

Enough, you’re a POS. 

 

[Warrior]

13 minutes ago, GoBigBlack said:

So, he had nuclear info and wasn’t using it for a business advantage. It’s so obviously clear what that says. You lose. Pay up. 🙄

 

You’re an idiot, slap your mom.