Jump to content

Vegas shooting


Cossacks

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRealCAJ said:

You are kind of whimpy enough to own an AR-15 and I'm positive it would boost your self-confidence somewhat, but you lack the balls.

 

 

See your thinking is typical liberal stupidity. People don't own guns to boost self confidence. Not at least the ones I know. Sport (yes). Protection (yes). Hunting (yes). Target shooting (yes). Competition shooting (yes).  Killing (absolutely not).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, aZjimbo said:

See your thinking is typical liberal stupidity. People don't own guns to boost self confidence. Not at least the ones I know. Sport (yes). Protection (yes). Hunting (yes). Target shooting (yes). Competition shooting (yes).  Killing (absolutely not).  

 

It's cute when ChipDumbRacist gets like this.

He acts like he knows what others are thinking when he himself couldn't think his way out of a 2-walled room. I imagine he goes to the mall and spends hours in dumbstruck awe looking at the magical moving stairs.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, aZjimbo said:

See your thinking is typical liberal stupidity. People don't own guns to boost self confidence. Not at least the ones I know. Sport (yes). Protection (yes). Hunting (yes). Target shooting (yes). Competition shooting (yes).  Killing (absolutely not).  

My thinking is whimpy people like you need AR-15s to prove you can shoot a gun. 

"look look, I just took out 25 beer cans with my AR-15".....laughter and cheering from the 3 people watching you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, concha said:

 

It's cute when ChipDumbRacist gets like this.

He acts like he knows what others are thinking when he himself couldn't think his way out of a 2-walled room. I imagine he goes to the mall and spends hours in dumbstruck awe looking at the magical moving stairs.

.

No escalators in swampville I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said:

I know exactly what you are thinking and it would be cute to see you "get like anything at all" after another mass slaughter of Americans..... instead of jamming the 2nd Amendment further up your ass.

so Cajun you get off posting half naked pictures of little boys. Granted you're a sick fuck. Should we blame the boys for not wearing shirts or your sick ass?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 181pl said:

Ban Bump Stocks. Plain and simple. BTW, they were given the green like by the Obama Admin in 2010. Just saying...

Always gotta keep the long con in mind when thinking about Obama.  He wanted to take guns away from everybody by keeping bump stocks legal.  He was crafty that way.

The way I remember fake history is in 2012, after Sandy Hook, Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to ban Bump Stocks.  It didn't pass.

Given that we can't go back and change the past, the question is how do we move forward:

  • What should we do now?
  • Do you think it will happen -- Why or why not?
  • Is there anything we, as individuals, should be doing?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This aspect of the 2nd amendment and firearms seems to get very little play. I'd say "I wonder why", but I do.  Anywhoooo... worth a look.

https://www.google.com/search?q=defensive+firearm+use+statistics&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS691US691&oq=defensive+firearm+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.13298j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

Quote

Estimates over the number of defensive gun uses vary wildly, depending on the study's definition of a defensive gun use, survey design, population, criteria, time-period studied, and other factors. Low-end estimates are in the range of 55,000 to 80,000 incidents per year, while high end estimates reach of 4.7 million per year. 

 

Quote

“almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year.”

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, concha said:

This aspect of the 2nd amendment and firearms seems to get very little play. I'd say "I wonder why", but I do.  Anywhoooo... worth a look.

https://www.google.com/search?q=defensive+firearm+use+statistics&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS691US691&oq=defensive+firearm+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.13298j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

 

 

 

 

How many more innocent people must we bury in the name of your ridiculously goofy links, concha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of posting dueling research which never leads anywhere, it just so happens that this month Scientific American published an article which contains a review of several dozen peer-reviewed studies related to guns, including defensive uses.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/more-guns-do-not-stop-more-crimes-evidence-shows/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2017 at 9:05 AM, LiberalDonaldTrump said:

There’s no way  someone should be able to sneak in over 10 automatic rifles into a hotel room...that’s unacceptable 

WELL DUMB ASS! These guns break down into itty bitty pieces! The larger question might be, how did he get thousands of rounds of ammo into his room? They weigh hundreds of pounds in total!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or how was he able to set up cameras in a casino or mess with the fire alarms? Why rent 2 rooms? why were people including police saying there were multiple shooters? why can you see muzzle flashes from the 6th floor? why are they saying the 2 windows blown out on the 32nd floor belong to 1 room?  Bullshit stayed there many times no way in frick those windows come from the same room. Why some rounds sound like they are coming from right next door while others sound like they are coming from the 32nd floor?  How does a 64 yr old man get 400 pounds of ammo up 32 floors? How in the frick does not one frigging camera in a casino catch this 64 yr old man hauling in all this ammo 20 something guns and 2 gun stands? How can you stay in a casino for 3 days with a do not disturb on ur door and not raise questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2017 at 4:50 PM, 15yds4gibberish said:
  •                                                           
  • We will be told we must not politicize the tragedy (of course, just saying "don't politicize" is  politicizing.)                                                                                                                                                        
  • The identity of the shooter doesn't affect how many people are dead or how grievously their families and communities are wounded.  But depending on the identity of the shooter everything about the news coverage and political response will be different:
    • If he's white, he will be "troubled," "deranged,"  'disturbed,' and/or apparently now a "liberal."
    • If he has an Arab sounding name, it will be a new episode of 'jihad.'
    • If he's Mexican, it will be a clear demonstration of the perils of immigration.
    • If he's an illegal immigrant, he'll dramatize the need to immediately crack down hard .
    • If he's black, God forgive us in advance the consequences.                                                              

Right?!!! Like these right wing nut jobs don't politicize any thing done by non-white people but the violence of white people is off limits or needs to be derailed/diverted from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...