OT: CNN is ISIS... hilarious

[aZjimbo]

1 hour ago, rockinl said:

I truly believe this.

 

 

commies.

[Blueliner]

20 minutes ago, TheRealCAJ said:

last train to Clarksville bump

Seriously. I hope you're not trying to be funny. You're not whitty at all, and dumb to boot. Not a a good combo. Do you enjoy everyone laughing at you? Because they are, ya know. I think even DBP rolls his eyes behind his keyboard. Just food for thought.

[TheRealCAJ]

love stinks bump

[Nolebull813]

Here is someone applying to work for CNN 

 

[thc6795]

Can someone help me out? This seems to be a major story everywhere except CNN, Why? Not one mention by CNN nothing, nada, zip. Could it be because there is actual proof that the Obama administration I dare say did collude and obstruct an investigation? Nah nothing to see here right?

 

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/senate-investigating-loretta-lynch-conduct-during-clinton-email-probe-n776046?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_np

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/23/senate-panel-questions-lynch-over-political-interference-in-clinton-probe.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/senators-are-investigating-former-ag-loretta-lynch-for-political-interference/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-probes-loretta-lynchs-alleged-interference-clinton-email-170004670.html

 

CNN did think it was very important or important enough to report how they had to send a sketch artist to the WH briefing because of big meanie President Trump.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/23/media/white-house-press-briefing-sketch-artist/index.html

[thc6795]

poor CNN has gotten their panties in a real bundle, maybe douchebagpussy66 can help them untangle them?  Don't ever stop President Trump, please continue to show what lumps of shit these media types really are.

Relations between administration and media are at breaking point

[TheRealCAJ]

bumble bee tuna fish bump

[thc6795]

6 hours ago, Blueliner said:

Seriously. I hope you're not trying to be funny. You're not whitty at all, and dumb to boot. Not a a good combo. Do you enjoy everyone laughing at you? Because they are, ya know. I think even DBP rolls his eyes behind his keyboard. Just food for thought.

It is obvious this lump of shit doesn't care. Hopefully an alligator eats his as soon

[TheRealCAJ]

Taco Bell's $5 Cravings Deal bump

[Blueliner]

44 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

It is obvious this lump of shit doesn't care. Hopefully an alligator eats his as soon

I read somewhere that people who "beg for attention(troll)" on message boards often have serious emotional and psychological issues. Seriously. I think that it's true.  I couldn't imagine doing what he does. Why bother to even come here if NOBODY respects or likes ya (well...except for Big Drop and DBP...and Big Drop dun left the building).  Maybe he's got some kind of personality disorder. Dude's out there.

[TheRealCAJ]

sno-cone bump

[TheRealCAJ]

national praline day bump

[concha]

SCOTUS bump

 

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2017-06-24-US--Supreme Court/id-95872f15f4c447a6b0ef40a97014007e

 

[Nolebull813]

Getting conservative Supreme Court judges is the true prize of a republican becoming President.

Trump is the best case scenario for President. His beliefs are in line with the majority of the country. He has America's best intentions at heart and it shows with all his promises being kept. 

Despite the devilish trash you see on TV with the fake news, domestic terrorist groups like Antifa, LGBT and BLM, this country is flourishing and the President is trying his hardest to put honest, legal Americans first! 

[aZjimbo]

1 hour ago, concha said:

SCOTUS bump

 

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2017-06-24-US--Supreme Court/id-95872f15f4c447a6b0ef40a97014007e

 

You talk about the need for term limits?

[Nolebull813]

Yeah I read an article about people trying to hire nutritionist and personal trainers for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to keep her alive as long as possible. I don't think it was literally true, but the idea of the article was everyone needs to keep her alive as long as possible and guard her with their lives. Lol

as soon as one of these liberal judges retire or pass away, then that's when Christmas comes, and things start falling into place exactly as they should be

[aZjimbo]

13 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

Yeah I read an article about people trying to hire nutritionist and personal trainers for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to keep her alive as long as possible. I don't think it was literally true, but the idea of the article was everyone needs to keep her alive as long as possible and guard her with their lives. Lol

as soon as one of these liberal judges retire or pass away, then that's when Christmas comes, and things start falling into place exactly as they should be

Hopefully a right leaning SC for next 30/40 years.

[TheRealCAJ]

Wild Thing bump

[HawgGoneIt]

 

 

Just in case we wanted to know which terrorists have been and continue to be the most successful in the USA. 

 

 

Most Terrorists in U.S. Are Right Wing, Not Muslim

 

June 22, 2017

Mirren Gidda

Displayed with permission from Newsweek

 

U.S. President Donald Trump was elected vowing to get tough on “radical Islamic terrorism.” He has tried to implement a travel ban barring people from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S. and has tweeted frequently about Islamist terrorist attacks around the world. On Thursday, a new report claimed the president has his facts muddled.

A joint project by the Investigative Fund at the Nation Institute, a nonprofit media center, and Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting has found that within the past nine years, right-wing extremists plotted or carried out nearly twice as many terrorist attacks as Islamist extremists. Of the 115 right-wing incidents, police only foiled 35 percent. Compare this to the 63 Islamist terrorism cases, where police foiled 76 percent of the planned attacks.

Right-wing extremists were not only more successful, they were often more deadly, too. From 2008 to 2016, a third of right-wing attacks involved fatalities, compared to 13 percent of Islamist attacks. It should be noted, however, that Islamist extremists killed more people overall, with a death toll of 90 people compared to 79.

In a statement pointing out the higher rate of successful, right-wing terrorist attacks, the Investigative Fund said: “This project quantifies just how irrational Trump and the GOP's fixation on 'radical Islamic terrorism' as the greatest security threat is.”

 

“Fixation” might be the right word. The president has yet to acknowledge the problem of right-wing violence, remaining uncharacteristically silent after an Islamophobic attack on a mosque in London that left one man dead. (Trump tweeted about the three incidents of Islamist terrorism that have hit the U.K. capital in recent months.)

Part of the problem, the Investigative Fund and Reveal suggest, are the people that Trump has advising him. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the president’s former national security adviser,  had said that “fear of Muslims is rational,” and that he doesn’t “see Islam as a religion.” Trump advisor Steve Bannon has referred to Islam as a “religion of submission,” and is believed to have been a strong advocate for the ban on certain nationalities entering the U.S. (As the former head of Breitbart News, Bannon boasted that the organization was “the platform for the alt-right.”)

The new administration, says Reveal and the Investigative Fund, is therefore unlikely to change the culture whereby federal authorities disproportionately focus on potential Islamist extremists. Of the incidents’ the two organizations registered, federal authorities handled 91 percent of the Islamist ones and just 60 percent of the right-wing ones.

[thc6795]

14 hours ago, concha said:

SCOTUS bump

 

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2017-06-24-US--Supreme Court/id-95872f15f4c447a6b0ef40a97014007e

 

Frigging great bump. 

 Can you imagine the heads exploding when the Republicans nominate and approve the next judge?

[World Citizen]

4 minutes ago, thc6795 said:

Frigging great bump. 

 Can you imagine the heads exploding when the Republicans nominate and approve the next judge?

At least Trump can't pick the next one because he only has 3 1/2 years left.  ?  We know that Presidents no longer have 4 years, so what's the new time frame?   Normally I would be a smart ass but it's a serious question.  How long does the Pres have to make a pick?  Somewhere between 1 month and 38 months is the new sweet spot. 

[thc6795]

16 minutes ago, World Citizen said:

At least Trump can't pick the next one because he only has 3 1/2 years left.  ?  We know that Presidents no longer have 4 years, so what's the new time frame?   Normally I would be a smart ass but it's a serious question.  How long does the Pres have to make a pick?  Somewhere between 1 month and 38 months is the new sweet spot. 

If it is not Trump it will be Spence. I'm betting the libs would rather it be President Trump selecting the next Surpreme court Judge?

[TheRealCAJ]

7 hours ago, HawgGoneIt said:

 

 

Just in case we wanted to know which terrorists have been and continue to be the most successful in the USA. 

 

 

Most Terrorists in U.S. Are Right Wing, Not Muslim

 

June 22, 2017

Mirren Gidda

Displayed with permission from Newsweek

 

U.S. President Donald Trump was elected vowing to get tough on “radical Islamic terrorism.” He has tried to implement a travel ban barring people from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S. and has tweeted frequently about Islamist terrorist attacks around the world. On Thursday, a new report claimed the president has his facts muddled.

A joint project by the Investigative Fund at the Nation Institute, a nonprofit media center, and Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting has found that within the past nine years, right-wing extremists plotted or carried out nearly twice as many terrorist attacks as Islamist extremists. Of the 115 right-wing incidents, police only foiled 35 percent. Compare this to the 63 Islamist terrorism cases, where police foiled 76 percent of the planned attacks.

Right-wing extremists were not only more successful, they were often more deadly, too. From 2008 to 2016, a third of right-wing attacks involved fatalities, compared to 13 percent of Islamist attacks. It should be noted, however, that Islamist extremists killed more people overall, with a death toll of 90 people compared to 79.

In a statement pointing out the higher rate of successful, right-wing terrorist attacks, the Investigative Fund said: “This project quantifies just how irrational Trump and the GOP's fixation on 'radical Islamic terrorism' as the greatest security threat is.”

 

“Fixation” might be the right word. The president has yet to acknowledge the problem of right-wing violence, remaining uncharacteristically silent after an Islamophobic attack on a mosque in London that left one man dead. (Trump tweeted about the three incidents of Islamist terrorism that have hit the U.K. capital in recent months.)

Part of the problem, the Investigative Fund and Reveal suggest, are the people that Trump has advising him. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the president’s former national security adviser,  had said that “fear of Muslims is rational,” and that he doesn’t “see Islam as a religion.” Trump advisor Steve Bannon has referred to Islam as a “religion of submission,” and is believed to have been a strong advocate for the ban on certain nationalities entering the U.S. (As the former head of Breitbart News, Bannon boasted that the organization was “the platform for the alt-right.”)

The new administration, says Reveal and the Investigative Fund, is therefore unlikely to change the culture whereby federal authorities disproportionately focus on potential Islamist extremists. Of the incidents’ the two organizations registered, federal authorities handled 91 percent of the Islamist ones and just 60 percent of the right-wing ones.

delusional wing nut bump

[Nolebull813]

8 hours ago, HawgGoneIt said:

 

 

Just in case we wanted to know which terrorists have been and continue to be the most successful in the USA. 

 

 

Most Terrorists in U.S. Are Right Wing, Not Muslim

 

June 22, 2017

Mirren Gidda

Displayed with permission from Newsweek

 

U.S. President Donald Trump was elected vowing to get tough on “radical Islamic terrorism.” He has tried to implement a travel ban barring people from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S. and has tweeted frequently about Islamist terrorist attacks around the world. On Thursday, a new report claimed the president has his facts muddled.

A joint project by the Investigative Fund at the Nation Institute, a nonprofit media center, and Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting has found that within the past nine years, right-wing extremists plotted or carried out nearly twice as many terrorist attacks as Islamist extremists. Of the 115 right-wing incidents, police only foiled 35 percent. Compare this to the 63 Islamist terrorism cases, where police foiled 76 percent of the planned attacks.

Right-wing extremists were not only more successful, they were often more deadly, too. From 2008 to 2016, a third of right-wing attacks involved fatalities, compared to 13 percent of Islamist attacks. It should be noted, however, that Islamist extremists killed more people overall, with a death toll of 90 people compared to 79.

In a statement pointing out the higher rate of successful, right-wing terrorist attacks, the Investigative Fund said: “This project quantifies just how irrational Trump and the GOP's fixation on 'radical Islamic terrorism' as the greatest security threat is.”

 

“Fixation” might be the right word. The president has yet to acknowledge the problem of right-wing violence, remaining uncharacteristically silent after an Islamophobic attack on a mosque in London that left one man dead. (Trump tweeted about the three incidents of Islamist terrorism that have hit the U.K. capital in recent months.)

Part of the problem, the Investigative Fund and Reveal suggest, are the people that Trump has advising him. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the president’s former national security adviser,  had said that “fear of Muslims is rational,” and that he doesn’t “see Islam as a religion.” Trump advisor Steve Bannon has referred to Islam as a “religion of submission,” and is believed to have been a strong advocate for the ban on certain nationalities entering the U.S. (As the former head of Breitbart News, Bannon boasted that the organization was “the platform for the alt-right.”)

The new administration, says Reveal and the Investigative Fund, is therefore unlikely to change the culture whereby federal authorities disproportionately focus on potential Islamist extremists. Of the incidents’ the two organizations registered, federal authorities handled 91 percent of the Islamist ones and just 60 percent of the right-wing ones.

So you cite a biased source. That's not surprising. Why not tell me what CNN, WaPo or the NYT thinks. 

How did they determine the person was a "right wing extremist"? Trump has only been running for President for a year or so. Your essay said that in the past 9 years. So how do they know they are right wingers? Did they have Reagan/Bush 84 shirts on? Did they have confederate hats on and punch someone in a bar? Maybe a guy with a Longhorns shirt on got in a DUI. Lol. 

You do realize the biggest and most popular domestic terrorist groups in the US are liberal kooks? (Antifa, LGBT and BLM) 

And this article still proves a point that even though there are far less Muslims in this country than "right wingers" they are still deadlier. So why the fuck would America bring these people here by the thousands KNOWING they are the deadliest type of people in the country and world? 

[TheRealCAJ]

Tutti frutti, oh rutti bump

long live the CNN is ISIS... hilarious thread.