Jump to content

Politifact


Nolebull813

Recommended Posts

So this left wing company was hired by Facebook to censor free speech they deem to be incorrect information. Candace Owens posts on Facebook that Joe Biden is not the President-elect. So politifact flagged the post, and Facebook took it down. Candace Owens knowing that this was an abuse of power hired lawyers and politifact had to retract their lies, and Facebook allowed the truth to be reposted. 
 

This is a slippery slope. Tech giants are hiring partisan operatives to censor free speech they disagree with. The only reason politifact retracted their lies, was because lawyers got involved. Does anyone find it disturbing that the tech monopolies are hiring biased companies to do their dirty work? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SOCIntellectualProperty said:

Candance The Bed Wench is looney as hell

 

 

Calm down Tariq Nasheed. It doesn’t matter who the victim was. You can’t justify injustice because you don’t like or agree with the victim. You missed the entire point. Is it ok for companies with huge influence and power to hire third parties to enforce rogue policies? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

Calm down Tariq Nasheed. It doesn’t matter who the victim was. You can’t justify injustice because you don’t like or agree with the victim. You missed the entire point. Is it ok for companies with huge influence and power to hire third parties to enforce rogue policies? 

SOC can't respond to that...Your post was above reproach, is factual and Candace Owens is outstanding...

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

Calm down Tariq Nasheed. It doesn’t matter who the victim was. You can’t justify injustice because you don’t like or agree with the victim. You missed the entire point. Is it ok for companies with huge influence and power to hire third parties to enforce rogue policies? 

NB...it's just a simply expansion of Citizens United.

Which was the worst thing to ever happen to the U.S. Republic.

 

 

Rufus>>

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

Calm down Tariq Nasheed. It doesn’t matter who the victim was. You can’t justify injustice because you don’t like or agree with the victim. You missed the entire point. Is it ok for companies with huge influence and power to hire third parties to enforce rogue policies? 

These assholes cut their civics class to smoke a spiff out behind the field. Oh wait...was civics even taught at their schools? 🤔

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

So this left wing company was hired by Facebook to censor free speech they deem to be incorrect information. Candace Owens posts on Facebook that Joe Biden is not the President-elect. So politifact flagged the post, and Facebook took it down. Candace Owens knowing that this was an abuse of power hired lawyers and politifact had to retract their lies, and Facebook allowed the truth to be reposted. 
 

This is a slippery slope. Tech giants are hiring partisan operatives to censor free speech they disagree with. The only reason politifact retracted their lies, was because lawyers got involved. Does anyone find it disturbing that the tech monopolies are hiring biased companies to do their dirty work? 

It's worse than a slipper slope to constantly be pelted with "alternative facts." Look at what it has done to you. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Blueliner said:

These assholes cut their civil class to smoke a spiff. Oh wait...was civics even taught at their schools? 🤔

I think I had an hour of civics 3 time  a week for half of one year in high school. No wonder few really understand our system.

This should be taught fully and completely to every American in school not how to speak Spanish! 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

Calm down Tariq Nasheed. It doesn’t matter who the victim was. You can’t justify injustice because you don’t like or agree with the victim. You missed the entire point. Is it ok for companies with huge influence and power to hire third parties to enforce rogue policies? 

I did not miss the point...perhaps you did

 

which is what makes your post funny

 

Biden IS President Elect

 

Candace was being technical because the contest hasn’t been certified 

That’s like  saying a 44-0 football game with 30 seconds left isn’t over; it’s stupid as fuck and to be expected from this stupid broad 

Pol9tifact calling her post false is a LONG way from some leftist agenda as your posts suggests

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Nolebull813 said:

So this left wing company was hired by Facebook to censor free speech they deem to be incorrect information. Candace Owens posts on Facebook that Joe Biden is not the President-elect. So politifact flagged the post, and Facebook took it down. Candace Owens knowing that this was an abuse of power hired lawyers and politifact had to retract their lies, and Facebook allowed the truth to be reposted.

Joe Biden is the President-Elect.

Candace Owens is a grifter and a boob.

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/candace-owens/

She has a perfect 100% false score on Politifact.

Bang up job, Candace!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, concha said:

Until the election is officially official, all you can do is presume.

Every election winner in modern history has been the President-Elect way before the Electoral College meets.

This is just a silly semantics game that you're playing. One that you didn't play when Trump was standing in front of a President-Elect podium in November 2016.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is just a silly semantics game that you're playing.

This is just a silly semantics game that you both are playing....

Much like "impeachment" you can call it whatever you like,

But at the end of the day, neither term indicates whether you are going to be a president or not, just because it is used.

You are just going to have to wait like everyone else...

Hope this helps 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...