Jan 6th tapes

[Ga96]

Why is this event a topic hell we all seen it live. 

[Troll]

4 minutes ago, Nolebull813 said:

When they teach a class in hypocrisy this will be chapter 1 in hypocrisy, 101

 

PS:

 

BTW:

[Troll]

3 minutes ago, Ga96 said:

Why is this event a topic hell we all seen it live. 

 

[Nolebull813]

You see the right wing version of “peaceful protesters”

[DBP66]

4 hours ago, concha said:

https://amgreatness.com/2023/03/09/a-handy-january-6-fact-sheet/

 

A Handy January 6 Fact Sheet

Plenty of other falsehoods and misrepresentations animate the fable of January 6. But for those honestly seeking the truth, consider this a cheat sheet for future use.

 

In another example of Washington’s inexorable slide into banana republic territory, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) took to the floor of the U.S. Senate on Tuesday to call for the removal of an American journalist. 

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen an anchor treat the American people, and American democracy, with such disdain,” Schumer said during his seven-minute authoritarian tirade. “And he’s going to come back tonight with another segment. Fox News should tell him not to. Fox News, Rupert Murdoch—tell Mr. Carlson not to run a second segment of lies. You know it’s a lie.”

Schumer later reiterated his demand to a group of journalists who, rather than denounce one of the most powerful government officials in the country attempting to silence an influential member of the media, dutifully reported Schumer’s bleating without question.

Republican senators including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senator Mitt Romney (R-Utah) joined the fray, echoing Schumer’s faux concerns over “national security.”

Clearly, it’s panic time. The White House, Congress, and the Democratic Party propaganda arm that is the corporate media realize their carefully engineered narrative about January 6 is imploding in real time. Which is why they’re accusing Carlson of “whitewashing” and “rewriting” the events of January 6. Anything less than total fealty to regime-approved talking points about what happened before and after that day now is considered a “threat to democracy.”

But facts are facts. And no amount of pearl-clutching by the hags on “The View” or threats made by U.S. senators can alter the reality of January 6. Between video recordings, witness testimony, court filings, and news reporting, the undeniable truth about January 6 cannot be willfully wished away even by the most skilled spinmeisters.

Here’s what we know:

• Some people acted badly. A handful came ready for a fight while others admit they were caught up in a mob mentality that unfolded over the course of the afternoon.

   

• The overwhelming majority of protesters did not act badly or violently. Not only do security footage and other video sources demonstrate that is indeed true, the Justice Department’s own data supports it. “Parading” in the Capitol, a class B misdemeanor, is by far the most common charge in the Justice Department’s sweeping investigation. According to an update published this week, 919 out of 1,000 defendants face trespassing charges. Of the 518 who accepted plea agreements, 385 pleaded guilty to misdemeanors and 133 pleaded guilty to a felony.

   

• The most common felony is not “insurrection” but rather obstruction of an official proceeding. Fewer than 20 people face seditious conspiracy charges.

   

• Roughly 100 defendants are accused of attacking police officers with a dangerous weapon. No one is charged with carrying or using a firearm inside the building.

   

• Speaking of police, body-worn camera and independent video show outrageous misconduct by law enforcement. D.C. Metropolitan Police launched an aggressive and unnecessary offensive against the crowd assembled on the west lawn. Even though protesters were respecting police lines at the time, footage shows officers throwing stun grenades into and other devices containing rubber bullets into the crowd beginning shortly after 1:00 p.m.

   

• Video and testimony by Capitol police officers at trial confirmed how that activity enraged the crowd. Other officers shoved women down stairs and shoved one man off the upper terrace balcony.

   

• This conduct continued inside the building. Some officers shoved and hit individuals inside the Rotunda and other areas. A brutal scene in the lower west terrace tunnel unfolded as police used their batons to beat at least two women on the head resulting in bleeding and injuries.

   

• Excessive force caused the deaths of four Trump supporters: Ashli Babbitt, Rosanne Boyland, Kevin Greeson, and Benjamin Phillips.

   

• On the flip side, despite persistent claims even by Attorney General Merrick Garland and White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre as recently as this week, no police officers died as a result of injuries sustained on January 6. Officer Brian Sicknick is on video walking around after he suffered a pepper spray attack; he died of a stroke the next day. There’s no evidence the reported suicides of other officers after January 6 were related to the protest.

   

• Further, the responsibility of sufficiently protecting the Capitol with enough officers fell to the Capitol Police board—staffed by the sergeant-at-arms for then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund repeatedly testified that he requested additional help including National Guardsmen days before January 6. Even as the chaos unfolded that day, House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger delayed pursuing the proper authorization of the National Guard.

 

• Irving told House Republicans that his staff as well as members of the House Administration committee began planning for January 6 weeks before the protest. Jamie Fleet, a security staffer for both Pelosi and the committee overseeing Capitol functions, told the January 6 select committee that he started preparations for January 6 in the summer of 2020.

   

• When the building was breached at around 2:15 p.m., Congress was not voting to certify the electoral college results at the time, a common misperception. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Arizona) were in the process of disputing the election outcome in Gosar’s home state, a process permitted under the Electoral Count Act. The joint session of Congress technically had been adjourned an hour earlier so debate could begin.

 

• For all the wasted energy spent over the past two years that democracy almost died on January 6, the chaotic protest only delayed the certification ceremony for seven hours. Joe Biden officially was declared president at 3:00 a.m. the next day.

   

• The surveillance video viewed by Carlson’s team has not been made available to defense attorneys, arguably in violation of defendants’ constitutional rights.

 

• A separate trove of tapes that captured activity from the hours between noon and 8:00 p.m. was turned over to the FBI in early 2021 to use in its investigation. With few exceptions, all footage remains under protective orders. Defense attorneys consistently have complained that access to the full archive is constrained by the protective orders.

 

Plenty of other falsehoods and misrepresentations animate the fable of January 6. But for those honestly seeking the truth, consider this a cheat sheet for future use.

 

 

LOL...amgreatness.com???....LOL...come on!...you can do better than that champ...🤡

[Nolebull813]

There was some mischievous makers on 1/6 who vandalized and trespassed and should have been held accountable. I believe everyone was in agreement. But it was mostly a peaceful protest and ultimately a tour guide by capitol police who never felt threatened by the majority. The new videos that were intentionally hid from the public confirmed what we already knew 

[concha]

1 hour ago, World Citizen said:

That is the most self-unaware and oblivious post (outside of anything Nole post) you could have made.  You expect people, other than the idiots here who are not smart enough to have an original idea or even read properly, to believe this shit.  You are beyond pathetic.  Nobody believes this shit.  We all seen it live.  

Most of us even watched the hearings which comprised of Republican after Republican testifying to what happened.  The testimony was by Republicans.  You would know that if you were not such a whinny pussy and actually watched it.  But you are too much of a coward to do that aren't you?  Mueller report...too much of a coward to read that too but you still have opinions on what it said don't you.  You have no idea you just parrot what your lying news sources tell you.  

 

You seem upset.

 

I'm sure you think the kangaroo court was fair and objective. Of course you do.  Every member of the hearing committee was rabidly anti-Trump. They controlled everything that was seen and heard, right down to hiring a former tv executive to produce it to maximum effect. They asked the questions they wanted and approved to witnesses they chose and approved. No dissent or cross-examination allowed. It was, in effect, a Stalinist show trial. That is why the left is so enraged that "the other side" is getting information out that shows epic dishonesty in the part of the committee.

 

Have a wonderful rest of your day!  😁

 

 

[concha]

1 hour ago, World Citizen said:

Not sure why you are proud of Concha.  He does not understand anything related to BLM.  His response is the same every time, which means he NEVER learns EVERY time this is brought up.  He thinks because the founders bought a house and according to him, they are Marxists, therefor the BLM movement is a scam.  Nothing of value to it at all.  They state plainly what they are about, but Concha is just too smart for that.  He knows better.   

So NO, Concha should be embarrassed for never learning basic facts.  His hatred rules him.  Until he stops being hateful and a liar, I will pity him.  

 

The founder literally admitted it. Video posted above. Dumbass.

And it's not me being smart. It's you being a dumbass.

They got a mansion and fat payouts for the fam.

America - especially blacks - got death and billions in destruction in their neighborhoods.

Those are basic facts.

Queue the rage.  🤣

 

[World Citizen]

33 minutes ago, concha said:

 

You seem upset.

 

I'm sure you think the kangaroo court was fair and objective. Of course you do.  Every member of the hearing committee was rabidly anti-Trump. They controlled everything that was seen and heard, right down to hiring a former tv executive to produce it to maximum effect. They asked the questions they wanted and approved to witnesses they chose and approved. No dissent or cross-examination allowed. It was, in effect, a Stalinist show trial. That is why the left is so enraged that "the other side" is getting information out that shows epic dishonesty in the part of the committee.

 

Have a wonderful rest of your day!  😁

 

 

When shown to be a liar and apparently mentally challenged, you throw out the 'You seem upset' line.  You are predictable and offer nothing new.  

Why would I be upset?  I am not the one having a hard time dealing with reality.  You do understand that any Republican who wanted to come and testify could do so don't you?  You are an idiot if you do not understand that many refused to testify or if they did come forward, they pleaded the 5th.  Do you ever question WHY all those Republicans asked for pardons before Trump left office?  

The fact you even try to defend Jan 6 makes you an idiot.  The fact you try and lie about it too is why you are a sad person who deserves some pity.  

[concha]

4 minutes ago, World Citizen said:

When shown to be a liar and apparently mentally challenged, you throw out the 'You seem upset' line.  You are predictable and offer nothing new.  

Why would I be upset?  I am not the one having a hard time dealing with reality.  You do understand that any Republican who wanted to come and testify could do so don't you?  You are an idiot if you do not understand that many refused to testify or if they did come forward, they pleaded the 5th.  Do you ever question WHY all those Republicans asked for pardons before Trump left office?  

The fact you even try to defend Jan 6 makes you an idiot.  The fact you try and lie about it too is why you are a sad person who deserves some pity.  

 

You are upset.

And not exactly bringing the facts and refutation. Have you ever thought that in the face of people so shameless as to put on such a Stalinist show trial, pardon requests might be a prudent request?

And you might have missed it, probably because you are dishonest and stupid, but I have done nothing to defend the events of January 6th. Pointing out lies and exaggerations and deceptions on the part of the mainstream press and the J6 kangaroo committee is not "defending".

 

Rage on. 😂 🤪

[DBP66]

1 hour ago, concha said:

 

You seem upset.

 

I'm sure you think the kangaroo court was fair and objective. Of course you do.  Every member of the hearing committee was rabidly anti-Trump. They controlled everything that was seen and heard, right down to hiring a former tv executive to produce it to maximum effect. They asked the questions they wanted and approved to witnesses they chose and approved. No dissent or cross-examination allowed. It was, in effect, a Stalinist show trial. That is why the left is so enraged that "the other side" is getting information out that shows epic dishonesty in the part of the committee.

 

Have a wonderful rest of your day!  😁

 

 

McCarthy could have agreed to not send the clown squad to give the committee a chance to do it's job...the 2 Republicans on the committee are more Republican than you'll ever be...you got the balls to call Liz Cheney out??....she has a brain and morals....two things you lack...not to mention she doesn't worship the orange man like you...🤡

the committee showed videos and gave first-hand accounts of what happened that day...what McCarty and Tucker just did was a major flop....what was Tucker's big discovery??....not a damn thing...wonk...wonk...I hope you clowns got more than Tucker's silly act.

[Troll]

37 minutes ago, DBP66 said:

McCarthy could have agreed to not send the clown squad to give the committee a chance to do it's job...the 2 Republicans on the committee are more Republican than you'll ever be...you got the balls to call Liz Cheney out??....she has a brain and morals....two things you lack...not to mention she doesn't worship the orange man like you...🤡

the committee showed videos and gave first-hand accounts of what happened that day...what McCarty and Tucker just did was a major flop....what was Tucker's big discovery??....not a damn thing...wonk...wonk...I hope you clowns got more than Tucker's silly act.

"The Squad" ?!?!?

golly gee...

I wonder where,

ya got dat one....

🤡

 

PS: 

🤡🤡

 

brw: 

🤡🤡🤡

 

[DBP66]

34 minutes ago, Troll said:

"The Squad" ?!?!?

golly gee...

I wonder where,

ya got dat one....

🤡

 

PS: 

🤡🤡

 

brw: 

🤡🤡🤡

 

Clown squad....you know...🤡

[SeaShells21]

19 hours ago, concha said:

 

BLM is a scam.  Look into the women who founded it.  Trained Marxists. They bought a mansion in LA for themselves and have put lovers and family on the payroll at outrageous salaries and compensation. The protests they fomented resulted in more black deaths and billions in damage in the very neighborhoods they purport to care about (from their multi-million LA mansion).

At least try to not advertise what a fool you are.

 

https://www.dirt.com/gallery/moguls/power-players/black-lives-matter-founders-house-mansion-los-angeles-1203478245/

Turns Out Black Lives Matter Bought a $6 Million Los Angeles Mansion

https://nypost.com/2022/05/17/blm-paid-co-founders-baby-daddy-far-more-than-trayvon-martin-group/

BLM paid co-founder’s baby daddy nearly 5 times more than Trayvon Martin foundation

 

 

 

 

I already know your viewpoint of what BLM stands for Concha 😌 You alongside your right-wing affiliated friends have only posted the same articles revealing the purchased mansion about a couple dozen times.

I specifically said, “the basic understanding of what BLM was created for”. 
In simpler terms. The movement behind why it was created. Not what you feel it has become.

 

[SeaShells21]

13 hours ago, Warrior said:

Take a look at this video. Much of the Jan 6th narrative is complete BS.

 

You apparently didn’t read the statements Republicans made to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows. 

They seemed pretty concerned.

[Warrior]

9 minutes ago, SeaShells21 said:

You apparently didn’t read the statements Republicans made to the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows. 

They seemed pretty concerned.

Please enlighten us

[SeaShells21]

12 hours ago, Crusader12-0 said:

Just as any smart person has always known. The demonstrators had no intent to overthrow the government. Jan 6th was not an insurrection, let alone a coup.  Had it been, the mob would have brought big guns with them and they certainly wouldn’t have loitered around outside for hours before hand (that would waste precious time). They would have gone straight to the point, and probably never get inside. If the Military thought the govt was in danger, and saw the weapons, there would have been a huge gun battle. And let’s say the mob does win that and gets inside. They would have all gone to one specific point and attempt to capture the necessary people. That didn’t happen, instead you got a few dozen lost folks aimlessly wandering around, not knowing what they were doing or where they were going.

Nobody in that crowd was expecting to reach the capitol floor. It was a freak accident and a setup. If this was a coup, it was the worst planned one in history and has nothing in common with all the others in history. 

Jim Acosta to Mark Meadows: Will potus say something to tamp things down? Texted at 2:14 p.m.

 

 

2:28 p.m.: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to Mark Meadows: Mark I was just told there is an active shooter on the first floor of the Capitol. Please tell the President to calm people. This isn’t the way to solve anything.

 

2:32 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: Hey Mark, The president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home.

 

2:32 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: This is hurting all of us

 

2:33 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: He is destroying his legacy and playing into every stereotype … we lose all credibility against the BLM/Antifa crowd if things go South

 

 

2:38 p.m.: Michael Shear to Mark Meadows: Hey mark. Protestors are literally storming the Capitol. Breaking windows on doors. Rushing in. Is Trump going to say something?

 

2:44 p.m.: Rep. Barry Loudermilk to Mark Meadows: It’s really bad up here on the hill.

 

2:44 p.m.: Rep. Barry Loudermilk to Mark Meadows: They have breached the Capitol.

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: We are under siege in the Capitol

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: There’s an armed standoff at the house chamber door

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: We’re all helpless

 

2:46 p.m.: Rep. Will Timmons to Mark Meadows: The president needs to stop this ASAP

 

2:47 p.m.: Mario Parker to Mark Meadows: Is Potus going to take the podium to quell this unrest?

 

“He’s got to condem (sic) this shit. Asap,” Donald Trump Jr. texted at 2:53 p.m.
 

“POTUS needs to calm this shit down,” GOP Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina wrote at 3:04 p.m.

 

“POTUS should go on air and defuse this. Extremely important,” Tom Price, former Trump health and human services secretary and a former GOP representative from Georgia, texted at 3:13 p.m.

All of the above statements were made in an hour. [2:14 p.m. - 3:13 p.m.]

It’s time for you, @Nolebull813, @Slotback Right, @concha, @Warrior, @Troll, and @FreeBird to address the above statements.

⏰ . . . ⏰ . . . ⏰

The floor is yours boys……..

[concha]

2 hours ago, SeaShells21 said:

I already know your viewpoint of what BLM stands for Concha 😌 You alongside your right-wing affiliated friends have only posted the same articles revealing the purchased mansion about a couple dozen times.

I specifically said, “the basic understanding of what BLM was created for”. 
In simpler terms. The movement behind why it was created. Not what you feel it has become.

 

 

Apparently it was for the founders and their families to live it up. And the articles remain true and don't appear to affect you. You might want to pursue a bit of introspection about that.

You might not like the truth, but that it was has happened. Along with lots of death and destruction.

They purport to go after the police. But the fact is that in any given year an unarmed black man is more likely to get hit by lightning than get shot by a cop. If they really felt black lives mattered, they'd focus a lot more on the black community itself, where murder rates are multiples the national average and the victims overwhelmingly other blacks.  When a black man walks out the door in this country and is doomed to get shot and killed that day, you could bet his killer will be another black man and not a cop - and you'd almost never lose. But it's much easier (and apparently lucrative) to point the finger elsewhere.

 

 

[concha]

16 minutes ago, SeaShells21 said:

Jim Acosta to Mark Meadows: Will potus say something to tamp things down? Texted at 2:14 p.m.

 

 

2:28 p.m.: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to Mark Meadows: Mark I was just told there is an active shooter on the first floor of the Capitol. Please tell the President to calm people. This isn’t the way to solve anything.

 

2:32 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: Hey Mark, The president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home.

 

2:32 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: This is hurting all of us

 

2:33 p.m.: Laura Ingraham to Mark Meadows: He is destroying his legacy and playing into every stereotype … we lose all credibility against the BLM/Antifa crowd if things go South

 

 

2:38 p.m.: Michael Shear to Mark Meadows: Hey mark. Protestors are literally storming the Capitol. Breaking windows on doors. Rushing in. Is Trump going to say something?

 

2:44 p.m.: Rep. Barry Loudermilk to Mark Meadows: It’s really bad up here on the hill.

 

2:44 p.m.: Rep. Barry Loudermilk to Mark Meadows: They have breached the Capitol.

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: We are under siege in the Capitol

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: There’s an armed standoff at the house chamber door

 

2:45 p.m.: Jake Sherman to Mark Meadows: We’re all helpless

 

2:46 p.m.: Rep. Will Timmons to Mark Meadows: The president needs to stop this ASAP

 

2:47 p.m.: Mario Parker to Mark Meadows: Is Potus going to take the podium to quell this unrest?

 

“He’s got to condem (sic) this shit. Asap,” Donald Trump Jr. texted at 2:53 p.m.
 

“POTUS needs to calm this shit down,” GOP Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina wrote at 3:04 p.m.

 

“POTUS should go on air and defuse this. Extremely important,” Tom Price, former Trump health and human services secretary and a former GOP representative from Georgia, texted at 3:13 p.m.

All of the above statements were made in an hour. [2:14 p.m. - 3:13 p.m.]

It’s time for you, @Nolebull813, @Slotback Right, @concha, @Warrior, @Troll, and @FreeBird to address the above statements.

⏰ . . . ⏰ . . . ⏰

The floor is yours boys……..

 

I agree he should have.

I also recognize that the violence that occurred was getting started before his speech had ended and he called for peaceful demonstration. Clearly.

 

 

[DBP66]

1 minute ago, concha said:

 

I agree he should have.

I also recognize that the violence that occurred was getting started before his speech had ended and he called for peaceful demonstration. Clearly.

 

 

how was Trump's demeanor when he was whipping the mob up??...happy go lucky when he said "fight" 21 times??....or was he pissed off and calling Mike Pence out??..."peaceful"??...LOL...sure....there was nothing peaceful about that day....🤡

[Slotback Right]

8 hours ago, World Citizen said:

Do you ever question WHY all those Republicans asked for pardons before Trump left office?  

 

8 hours ago, concha said:

Have you ever thought that in the face of people so shameless as to put on such a Stalinist show trial, pardon requests might be a prudent request?

Exactly! Especially since any trials would be held in Washington D.C. which votes consistently Demonrat including voting 90.9% for Hillary over Trump in 2016, and 92.2% for Biden over Trump in 2020. Why wouldn't they cover their bets with a get out of jail card from Trump. Being innocent of everything is no guarantee of an acquittal, for a Republican. Far from it.

[DBP66]

3 hours ago, Slotback Right said:

 

Exactly! Especially since any trials would be held in Washington D.C. which votes consistently Demonrat including voting 90.9% for Hillary over Trump in 2016, and 92.2% for Biden over Trump in 2020. Why wouldn't they cover their bets with a get out of jail card from Trump. Being innocent of everything is no guarantee of an acquittal, for a Republican. Far from it.

why were they going to jail in the first place??.... it's prudent to ask for a pardon?...LOL...I bet it is.... especially if you committed a crime!...innocent people don't need to be "prudent"....just criminals do.....and it shows they knew they were GUITY of some crime...that's today's Republican party....a clown squad led by the big orange clown...🤡

[Troll]

11 hours ago, SeaShells21 said:

All of the above statements were made in an hour. [2:14 p.m. - 3:13 p.m.]

It’s time for you,, @Troll, and etc,etc to address the above statements.

⏰ . . . ⏰ . . . ⏰

The floor is yours boys……..

perhaps you should explain what you think your point is here first....(since you're requesting a response)🙄

your post was a reply to a claim that the protester's  intent wasn't to overthrow the gov.

Are you  claiming they could or they did?

not sure how some quoted messages (of the shit show) even supports that.

 

PS: my belief is that those "protests" were about as big a farce as the election...

...but I have never condoned 1/6, so why you group me with others is questionable to even begin with.

 

BTW: If you would like something from the shit show to address...

well...here ya go...(but maybe that's just some "deep fake", what do you think?)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5gxHmIEhZnpQ/ 

 

Oh yea, almost forgot...tock tick ⏰ . . . ⏰ . . . ⏰

🤣

[FreeBird]

31 minutes ago, Troll said:

perhaps you should explain what you think your point is here first....(since you're requesting a response)🙄

your post was a reply to a claim that the protester's  intent wan't to overthrow the gov.

Are you  claiming they could or they did?

not sure how some quoted messages (of the shit show) even supports that.

 

PS: my belief is that those "protests" were about as big a farce as the election...

...but I have never condoned 1/6, so why you group me with others is questionable to even begin with.

 

BTW: If you would like something from the shit show to address...

well...here ya go...(but maybe that's just some "deep fake", what do you think?)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5gxHmIEhZnpQ/ 

 

Oh yea, almost forgot...tock tick ⏰ . . . ⏰ . . . ⏰

🤣

I swear thees dumbasses on here actually thought the Maga crowd was gonna overthrow the government with Maga hats and American flags lmao 🤣 

[Troll]

7 minutes ago, FreeBird said:

I swear thees dumbasses on here actually thought the Maga crowd was gonna overthrow the government with Maga hats and American flags lmao 🤣 

I think her/his/it's point was "that it's all T's fault, for not acting or controlling the protesters"

but I could be wrong, that's why I asked for clarification...🤷‍♂️

(that's also why I posted the "shaman"  bull horning otherwise),

but he/she/it should have already seen that, on her/his/it's "unedited 11 hours" of footage...no?

🤔 

 

PS: no worries...he/she/it is on the clock ⏰ LOL,

so I'm sure you will have All the answers, very soon 👍