Jump to content

USA Today way too early rankings


Bodysurf

Recommended Posts

I’m sure his will spark some good discussion. However you need to take the info with a grain of salt. E.g. for MD it says they will have a ‘mostly intact offensive line’ when they only return 1 out of 5 starters. They also highlight that the defense returns 2 key Oregon commits, one of which did not play last season and the other will not play this upcoming season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone wanna bet against USAT having more states represented in their top 25 than anyone else?

way too much GA love — more than any other state — watch for GA posters to rally around USAT

them being the worst poll used to be the only thing we all agreed on 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

Looks like RedZone saying nice things about UHigh (Baton Rouge) might have some merit. They return 17 starters also which the little write-up did not include. Wish they had an OOS game.

I believe I would rather see Colquitt who returns 17 starters ranked instead of Bergen Catholic and Hoover.

Good thing is Bergen won't hang around long though. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bodysurf said:

I’m sure his will spark some good discussion. However you need to take the info with a grain of salt. E.g. for MD it says they will have a ‘mostly intact offensive line’ when they only return 1 out of 5 starters. They also highlight that the defense returns 2 key Oregon commits, one of which did not play last season and the other will not play this upcoming season.

 

Man...MD playing 1, 2 and 12 next year, plus the rest of the Trinity League...even @GardenStateBaller Has to admit they have the toughest schedule in the nation next year

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pops said:

Anyone wanna bet against USAT having more states represented in their top 25 than anyone else?

way too much GA love — more than any other state — watch for GA posters to rally around USAT

them being the worst poll used to be the only thing we all agreed on 

USA Today made DLS famous and had the most states represented then too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Eddyr2 said:

Man...MD playing 1, 2 and 12 next year, plus the rest of the Trinity League...even @GardenStateBaller Has to admit they have the toughest schedule in the nation next year

It’s a brutal schedule indeed and props to the Monarchs for stepping up. It’s nice to see many of the top teams with excellent schedules. Interesting that there is no DLS or Folsom. I would expect to see those 2 teams in some other pre season polls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bodysurf said:

I’m sure his will spark some good discussion. However you need to take the info with a grain of salt. E.g. for MD it says they will have a ‘mostly intact offensive line’ when they only return 1 out of 5 starters. They also highlight that the defense returns 2 key Oregon commits, one of which did not play last season and the other will not play this upcoming season.

 

Read their OL coach left to start a training facility for OL via our fav writer Sondheimer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedZone said:

Interesting.

Looks like RedZone saying nice things about UHigh (Baton Rouge) might have some merit. They return 17 starters also which the little write-up did not include. Wish they had an OOS game.

I believe I would rather see Colquitt who returns 17 starters ranked instead of Bergen Catholic and Hoover.

Good thing is Bergen won't hang around long though. 

 

 

So Bergen goes #3 when they travel down yander and wins by double digits against Bayson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bodysurf said:

I’m sure his will spark some good discussion. However you need to take the info with a grain of salt. E.g. for MD it says they will have a ‘mostly intact offensive line’ when they only return 1 out of 5 starters. They also highlight that the defense returns 2 key Oregon commits, one of which did not play last season and the other will not play this upcoming season.

 

Wow how the mighty have fallen.  Their rankings continue to be the laughing stock of the hsfb world.  Just horrible.  They need to hire someone that actually follows hsfb rather than just looking at a couple websites and like 247 and getting their info.  Lol.  Horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pops said:

Anyone wanna bet against USAT having more states represented in their top 25 than anyone else?

way too much GA love — more than any other state — watch for GA posters to rally around USAT

them being the worst poll used to be the only thing we all agreed on 

Still Waiting for the GA posters to Rally?

Hows it going for ya? 

Anyone of us started rallying yet? 

I still think USAT is mediocre... my opinion hasnt changed one bit... 

Idc if Grayson is #3 they could have Colquitt at #1 and Id still feel the same... 

But theyre still not as bad as CP... 

Now cue the pops CP defense system... 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FootballGuy said:

Doesn't have anything to do with what I said. But you see it tho. Point proven. 

I get what you are saying. I don't have a problem with his list. He is an east coast sports writer, who has also worked in GA for 5 years. He goes with what he knows.

The list is extremely random. Hoover!? R u kidding me!?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FolsomPrisonBlues said:

Assistant sports editor for SAVANNAH MORNING NEWS!?

Can someone help out here!? LOL!

Under previous not current 

 

And who cares the one doing calpreps is a CA homer so who gives a shit 

 

If anything it's just balancing out one garbage rankings with another one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bodysurf said:

I’m sure his will spark some good discussion. However you need to take the info with a grain of salt. E.g. for MD it says they will have a ‘mostly intact offensive line’ when they only return 1 out of 5 starters. They also highlight that the defense returns 2 key Oregon commits, one of which did not play last season and the other will not play this upcoming season.

 

No Centennial,De la salle or Folsom?? lol what a joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...