Jump to content

Trump's world....


DBP66

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, concha said:

 

Dummy, do ever read your own (unerringly stupid and angry) posts?  🤣 😂

 

I didn't "do" anything, Dummy, other than post the results of medical studies. You people are miserable and loonie AF. 

🤪

Sincerely,

concha

 

 PS:  Eat shit.  💩

 

Totally unhinged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean who possibly could've seen this coming?

On 3/1/2024 at 6:31 AM, Slotback Right said:

Not over yet

Judge Anil Singh of the state's mid-level appeals court ruled that Trump must post a bond covering the full amount in order to stop enforcement of the judgment. Singh did grant some of Trump's requests, including pausing a three-year ban on him seeking loans from New York banks — which could help him secure the necessary bond.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-fraud-appeal-bond-new-york/

 

On 3/1/2024 at 8:25 AM, Atticus Finch said:

If Slotback Right says it's not over then it is, indeed, 100% unequivocally over.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

Biden is as crooked as they come.

It's interesting then that he's been an elected official for 50 years, and investigated ceaselessly for 15 months by a motivated Republican-run Congress, and they haven't found as much as an unpaid parking ticket in which to charge him.

The gulf between the claims made about Biden and the evidence offered is often as wide as the Grand Canyon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

I’ll type slow just for you….and you must be new here to not understand.  …

this time as 66 would say “ we got him this time”

Good luck to you.

Except he didn't say that.  In fact he never says that, it's only you dolts who say that.  

So again, it doesn't make sense.  

I am having trouble with the fact that no e of you guys are EVER right about anything.  As Slot ack said the other day, a broken clock is right twice a day but you are NEVER right.  Unless you are talking about a comedy or music, I agree with you on that stuff, your ideology forces you to be wrong.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RedZone said:

Looks like they're all happy she's dead to me.

The maga cult is just too damn freaky!

 

Amen....At his rally this weekend he had the crowd stand up and salute the "Patriots" who are in jail?!?...and the cult members all stood up and saluted the Insurrectionists who beat the shit out of hundreds of cops....just when you think you've seen it all Donny and his cult become more dangerous by the day....he has them thinking up is down and down is up and they know that's a fact....amazing the power he has over his flock of sheep....Hitler had nothing on Trump...no joke!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like there is another Storm brewing......
 
Reuters

Trump loses bid to block Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels testimony at hush money trial

Luc Cohen
Updated Mon, March 18, 2024 at 5:53 PM EDT·3 min read
1k
7be397b502ae5aa4e88d9ad9cc742e48
 
FILE PHOTO: Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump holds rally in Richmond By Luc Cohen

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Donald Trump on Monday lost a bid to block testimony from Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels at his upcoming trial on charges stemming from hush money that Cohen, his former lawyer and fixer, paid Daniels, a porn star, before the 2016 election.

Trump last month asked Justice Juan Merchan to block their testimony, arguing Cohen had a history of lying and would likely lie again, and that Daniels - whose real name is Stephanie Clifford - would seek to use the trial to monetize her story.

In rejecting Trump's request to block Cohen's testimony, Merchan wrote he was unaware of any basis for Trump's "rationale that a prosecution witness should be kept off the witness stand because his credibility has been called into question."

The Republican presidential candidate has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up his reimbursement of Cohen for the payment to Daniels for her silence about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump in 2006. Trump denies an encounter.

A trial had initially been scheduled for March 25, but last week was delayed until at least mid-April due to a last-minute dispute over evidence disclosure. Merchan is expected to decide on a new trial date after a March 25 court hearing.

A spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office charged Trump last year, declined to comment. Trump's lawyers also declined to comment.

The case is one of four criminal indictments Trump faces as he prepares for an expected challenge to Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 election.

He has also pleaded not guilty in the other cases, which focus on his efforts to reverse his 2020 loss to Biden and his handling of government documents after leaving office in 2021.

In the Manhattan case, prosecutors argue the Daniels payoff was part of a broader "catch-and-kill" scheme Trump and Cohen hatched to buy the silence of people with negative information about the candidate. Cohen pleaded guilty to violating federal campaign finance laws in 2018.

Merchan on Monday also denied Trump's request to exclude testimony from or any evidence about the three people who received hush money payments. These included Daniels, a doorman and Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model who says she had an affair with Trump, which he also denies.

"The evidence and testimony surrounding these individuals is inextricably intertwined with the narrative of events and is necessary background for the jury," Merchan wrote.

Prosecutors argued the October 2016 payment to Daniels was made as the Trump campaign panicked about his standing with female voters, following the leak of an "Access Hollywood" tape in which Trump boasted about forcing himself on women.

In a modest victory for Trump, Merchan said prosecutors could ask witnesses about the tape, but agreed with Trump that playing the clip itself for the jury could cause him "undue prejudice." The judge said he may reconsider that ruling "should the Defense open the door."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The New York Times

What We Know About Trump’s Failure to Arrange a Half-Billion-Dollar Bond

Kate Christobek and Ben Protess
Tue, March 19, 2024 at 7:43 AM EDT·5 min read
306
 
Former President Donald Trump speaks to reporters outside State Supreme court in Manhattan, Dec. 7, 2023. (Dave Sanders/The New York Times)
 

Former President Donald Trump speaks to reporters outside State Supreme court in Manhattan, Dec. 7, 2023. (Dave Sanders/The New York Times

 

In six days, the former president must secure an appeal bond for roughly half a billion dollars in his civil fraud case in New York, a possibility that was called into question Monday.

In a court filing, Trump’s lawyers revealed that he had been unable to secure an appeal bond despite “diligent efforts” that included approaching about 30 bond companies.

While Trump this month managed to post a $91.6 million bond in a defamation case he recently lost to writer E. Jean Carroll, securing the deal at the eleventh hour from a large insurance company, he lacks the assets needed to secure the far bigger guarantee for the fraud case.

If he cannot produce the bond by March 25, Trump faces the possibility of financial disaster and humiliation. New York’s attorney general, who brought the fraud case, would be entitled to collect the $454 million and could seek to seize Trump’s New York properties or freeze his bank accounts.

And Trump’s money problems spread well beyond New York. As the presumptive Republican nominee for president, he is facing increased pressure to raise money to fund his campaign, lagging behind his opponent, President Joe Biden, in fundraising.

Here’s what we know about Trump’s financial problems:

Why does Trump owe so much?

Attorney General Letitia James took Trump to trial last fall and accused him of fraudulently inflating the value of his assets to obtain favorable loan terms.

Trump lost, and Justice Arthur Engoron imposed a judgment of $355 million plus interest, amounting to $454 million. Although James could have moved to collect immediately, she offered a 30-day grace period, which ends March 25.

Trump is now on the hook for the entirety of the judgment while he appeals. He can either come up with the money himself or, more likely, obtain a bond from a company that would promise to pay if Trump lost his appeal and defaulted.

For a bond of this size, Trump would need to pledge a significant amount of collateral — as much as $557 million, his lawyers said — including as much cash as possible, as well as any stocks and bonds he could sell quickly. He would also owe the bond company a fee that could amount to $20 million.

Does he have the money to cover it?

Short answer: no.

While Trump has long bragged about his wealth, his true financial position remains something of a mystery. A recent New York Times analysis found that Trump had more than $350 million in cash, but most of his other money was tied up in his real estate holdings.

In other words, he is not liquid enough to offer the collateral required for a bond this big.

And he has less cash available today than he did even a week ago. To secure the bond in the case he lost to Carroll, Trump most likely had to pledge more than $100 million in collateral to Chubb, the giant insurance company that provided the bond.

What comes next?

Trump has appealed the $454 million judgment and asked a higher New York court either to pause it or to accept a lesser bond of $100 million. James could also grant additional time for Trump to pay or show mercy to the former president by offering a counterproposal.

He might appeal to the state’s highest court, quickly sell an asset or seek help from a wealthy supporter.

And if all else fails, as a last resort, he could have the corporate entities implicated in the fraud case file for bankruptcy, which would automatically halt the judgment against those entities.

But Trump is likely to balk at a bankruptcy filing.

If none of these options happens by March 25, and Trump misses the deadline, James would be free to collect the money owed to the state.

Could he use campaign money to pay James?

Probably not.

A super PAC supporting his candidacy can raise unlimited amounts but is legally banned from coordinating with him and cannot pay the judgment.

And although the former president has used a political action committee under his control to pay for lawyers and witnesses in his legal cases, that group lacks the kind of money needed to address the $454 million penalty.

He is now scrambling to raise campaign cash as he faces a significant financial disparity with Biden. Biden’s campaign recently announced that it had entered March with $155 million cash on hand. While the Trump operation has not released a more recent total, between his campaign account and the Republican National Committee, there was about $40 million at the end of January.

What else is happening on March 25?

Trump also has a crucial hearing in his Manhattan criminal case, which could be the first prosecution of a former American president.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg filed charges against Trump that accuse him of covering up a sex scandal involving a porn actor to bolster his 2016 presidential campaign. The case is now proceeding to trial.

Jury selection was originally scheduled to start March 25, but the trial was delayed late last week after the disclosure of more than 100,000 pages of records that had been in the possession of the federal prosecutors.

While the documents have now been turned over, the trial was postponed to mid-April to give Trump’s lawyers time to review the papers.

Judge Juan M. Merchan set the March 25 hearing to determine if the trial should be delayed further and to rule on Trump’s motion for an outright dismissal.

The Manhattan case is among four criminal prosecutions Trump faces.

May be an image of 1 person and text

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2024 at 11:39 AM, Atticus Finch said:

This has not been a good day for the insurrectionist wing of this board.

First, Trump can't get bonded.

Then its reported that he's trying to bring a man convicted of Conspiracy Against the United States back into his campaign.

Manafort in Talks to Return for the Republican National Convention

Three qualities you definitely want in a presidential candidate:

1) Desperate for cash

2) Desperate to avoid jail time

3) Flagrantly corrupt

It’s probably no big deal that Trump is considering re-hiring the same Paul Manafort that Trump claimed he ‘barely knew,’ and who confessed to money laundering, was convicted of FARA crimes, and told lies to cover up what really happened with alleged Russian Spy Konstantine Kalimnik.  

No worries, such a hire probably wouldn't pose a national security risk…🙄

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 15yds4gibberish said:

Three qualities you definitely want in a presidential candidate:

1) Desperate for cash

2) Desperate to avoid jail time

3) Flagrantly corrupt

It’s probably no big deal that Trump is considering re-hiring the same Paul Manafort that Trump claimed he ‘barely knew,’ and who confessed to money laundering, was convicted of FARA crimes, and told lies to cover up what really happened with alleged Russian Spy Konstantine Kalimnik.  

No worries, such a hire probably wouldn't pose a national security risk…🙄

Don’t rip on Sleepy ole Joe like that…remember he’s someone’s great great grandfather 🤣1) and 3) are spot on Joe.  2) should be coming, but remember what Hur said in his report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 15yds4gibberish said:

Three qualities you definitely want in a presidential candidate:

1) Desperate for cash

2) Desperate to avoid jail time

3) Flagrantly corrupt

It’s probably no big deal that Trump is considering re-hiring the same Paul Manafort that Trump claimed he ‘barely knew,’ and who confessed to money laundering, was convicted of FARA crimes, and told lies to cover up what really happened with alleged Russian Spy Konstantine Kalimnik.  

No worries, such a hire probably wouldn't pose a national security risk…🙄

You must not have heard...that Russia thing was a hoax the whole time.  I too was fooled by all the direct evidence and obvious connections.  Hell, I even believed the Republican report that was put out just after the Mueller report (that I also believed) that basically said the same things.  

I should of listened to Concha and the rest of those guys.  They knew all along they were right, and the rest of the world was wrong.  Get onboard brother.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, I AM IRONMAN said:

Don’t rip on Sleepy ole Joe like that…remember he’s someone’s great great grandfather 🤣1) and 3) are spot on Joe.  2) should be coming, but remember what Hur said in his report.

Do you mean like the very first sentence here?:

image.png.3a2525d7a576af8de561cbadf5432d27.png

 

Or do you mean the part where Hur wrote this?:

image.png.ada3a5ba85450d76f4a1c8d2bbbc9e58.png

 

Or do you mean the parts of the report that were later undermined by the transcripts of the testimony such as when Hur remarked that Biden had "a photographic memory and recall of the house," or how at points Biden corrected his interrogators when they were the ones who misspoke?

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...