3/19: 4,200 infect 5/6 1,2 mil infect & 73K dead, 6/25 2.4 mil infect & 123k+ dead

[Newbie]

1 hour ago, noonereal said:

why do you want to believe the repeatable media are liars and the "alternate facts" media is real? 

One might say, "that you’ve been played. It’s not your fault, you don’t know any better. But there is still time for your to be free."

Peace

Read something recently here  how that mainstream media rules anything science 🤣

.quick question    according to who is a “monolith “.  Made out of metal.🤓

now reread your question out loud.  👍

[Slotback Right]

5 hours ago, noonereal said:

why do you want to believe the repeatable media are liars and the "alternate facts" media is real? 

One might say, "that you’ve been played. It’s not your fault, you don’t know any better. But there is still time for your to be free."

Peace

This is what you need:

 

[noonereal]

8 hours ago, Slotback Right said:

This is what you need:

 

Would this subliminal demand to heed work on such earthen creatures as are the TRumpets? 

We should try but I have my doubts. 

[BUFORDGAWOLVES]

bgw 

[Newbie]

On 11/29/2020 at 8:23 AM, noonereal said:

Would this subliminal demand to heed work on such earthen creatures as are the TRumpets? 

We should try but I have my doubts. 

One easy way to find out.  Ask them if those metal posts that keep popping up in the news are monoliths or not 👍

would YOU call them monoliths? 🤓

you never said 🤣

🍿

[Bormio]

As I have said before, the CDC estimates 8 times as many people have had this compared to the number of confirmed cases.  Whether that is true or not remains to be seen, but they have stuck with that estimate.  2 states by that estimate are over 50% in terms of their population that has had this - Wisconsin and Iowa (there might be others).  Iowa would be well over 60%.  And in both states the rate of infection are declining significantly - herd immunity?  

[Bormio]

If this is the case, would be great.  Many states approaching 50% 

[DownSouth]

2 hours ago, Bormio said:

And in both states the rate of infection are declining significantly - herd immunity?  

You’ve pondered that thought countless times since the summer and been wrong every time.

The pandemic ends when the vaccine is widely distributed and (hopefully) enough people decide to at least get the first shot (52% protection, protects from severe illness). That’s it, nothing more to it.

[Bormio]

1 minute ago, DownSouth said:

You’ve pondered that thought countless times since the summer and been wrong every time.

The pandemic ends when the vaccine is widely distributed and (hopefully) enough people decide to at least get the first shot (52% protection, protects from severe illness). That’s it, nothing more to it.

The vaccine will not be rolled out to much of the population before spring. The CDC believes 130 million Americans have had this.  At 200,000 confirmed cases a day or 1.6 million actual cases a day (according to the CDC) that is 48 million cases a month now.  A total of 230 million cases 2 months from now.  At some point there is herd immunity.  It is important to know where.  Iowa’s falling cases suggest 60% may be enough.

[Atticus Finch]

10 hours ago, DownSouth said:

You’ve pondered that thought countless times since the summer and been wrong every time.

The pandemic ends when the vaccine is widely distributed and (hopefully) enough people decide to at least get the first shot (52% protection, protects from severe illness). That’s it, nothing more to it.

The guy is like the Michael Jordan of quacks.

The GOAT.

[Atticus Finch]

13 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

#scamdemic 

This is not true.

But that's what I would expect from a shameless grifter (Candace Owens) and a crackhead (GardenStateBaller).

Fact check: Chart does not present accurate US deaths figure for 2020

[Troll]

30 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

This is not true.

But that's what I would expect from a shameless grifter (Candace Owens) and a crackhead (GardenStateBaller).

Fact check: Chart does not present accurate US deaths figure for 2020

sorry but it is true, and you have already been proven wrong on that one 👍

flinch flinch

 

NO meaningful difference in old age deaths this year 👍 as per Johns Hopkins....you know the one your article tries to quote after they admit they have no official numbers 🤣

So you can stop running around singing " not true not true" like you do...

👍Hope this helps

 

[Atticus Finch]

3 hours ago, Troll said:

sorry but it is true, and you have already been proven wrong on that one 👍

 

It's a complete lie.

As Politifact, Factcheck.org and Reuters have proven.

You have never even attempted to prove anything let alone actually done it.

[Atticus Finch]

3 hours ago, Troll said:

NO meaningful difference in old age deaths this year 👍 as per Johns Hopkins....you know the one your article tries to quote after they admit they have no official numbers 🤣

 

You mean this Johns Hopkins?

EXCESS DEATHS SHOW THE TRUE IMPACT OF COVID-19 IN THE U.S.

Epidemiologist Justin Lessler unpacks a recent CDC report on comorbidities and coronavirus deaths that is being misinterpreted on social media

[Newbie]

29 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

You mean this Johns Hopkins?

EXCESS DEATHS SHOW THE TRUE IMPACT OF COVID-19 IN THE U.S.

Epidemiologist Justin Lessler unpacks a recent CDC report on comorbidities and coronavirus deaths that is being misinterpreted on social media

You must be stupid.  🤓Yes of course that’s the one. But damage control does nothing to hide the fact that they also showed no increase in death rate for the elderly 🤫  and you are only referencing an article that tries to puzzle you with co- morbidities  and claims others are misinterpreting, all the while doing nothing to change the actual numbers and facts 🤣

 

ps. Perhaps  trying to call me a troll will help 👍

🍿

[Newbie]

43 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

It's a complete lie.

As Politifact, Factcheck.org and Reuters have proven.

You have never even attempted to prove anything let alone actually done it.

Btw: came out today some of the fact-checker sites that you patronize so blindly, are basically owned and operated by the Chinese government 👍

not to worry tho, they would not exist and could not survive, with out their clients  google, Facebook, and YouTube ...

extra credit for who owns alphabet 👍

you spread their propaganda poorly though, try and do better next time 👌

🍿

[Atticus Finch]

1 hour ago, Newbie said:

You must be stupid.  🤓Yes of course that’s the one. But damage control does nothing to hide the fact that they also showed no increase in death rate for the elderly 🤫  and you are only referencing an article that tries to puzzle you with co- morbidities  and claims others are misinterpreting, all the while doing nothing to change the actual numbers and facts 🤣

 

Confronting misinformation = damage control

🤡

You claims are simply false. Period.

[Atticus Finch]

1 hour ago, Newbie said:

all the while doing nothing to change the actual numbers and facts 🤣

 

These are the actual numbers.

Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19

Based on NVSS data, excess deaths have occurred every week in the United States since March 2020. An estimated 299,028 more persons than expected have died since January 26, 2020; approximately two thirds of these deaths were attributed to COVID-19. A recent analysis of excess deaths from March through July reported very similar findings, but that study did not include more recent data through September (5).

 

[Newbie]

2 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

These are the actual numbers.

Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19

Based on NVSS data, excess deaths have occurred every week in the United States since March 2020. An estimated 299,028 more persons than expected have died since January 26, 2020; approximately two thirds of these deaths were attributed to COVID-19. A recent analysis of excess deaths from March through July reported very similar findings, but that study did not include more recent data through September (5).

 

Again classifying deaths in a group called “excess” does not change the final grand totals or the Unchanged rate ,  or the fact that death rates for the elderly remained the same 👍

 

14 minutes ago, Atticus Finch said:

Distributing  misinformation = damage control

🤡

My claims are simply false. Period.

🧐

yes.  You be you. 👌

🍿

[Atticus Finch]

On 12/11/2020 at 3:19 PM, Newbie said:

Again classifying deaths in a group called “excess” does not change the final grand totals or the Unchanged rate ,  or the fact that death rates for the elderly remained the same 👍

 

They are subtracting the total deaths at this point in a normal year from the total deaths so far in 2020.

If you can't understand that then you're an incomprehensible moron.

[Atticus Finch]

It's important to know where idiots like Newbie/Troll got this lie from.

Flawed Analysis Leads to False Claim of ‘No Excess Deaths’ in 2020

The viral claim about “no excess deaths” — which has been amplified by unreliable websites and disseminated on Facebook and Twitter — stems from an online presentation by an economics lecturer at Johns Hopkins. But it’s flawed for multiple reasons, experts say.

In a Nov. 13 webinar, Genevieve Briand, the assistant director for the university’s Applied Economics master’s program, looked at select CDC data, such as weekly reported deaths, to reach the faulty conclusion that there is “no evidence that COVID-19 create[d] any excess deaths.”

Her claims were then relayed in a story in the Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a student-run publication, which said the analysis showed COVID-19 “has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.” The publication later retracted the report. An archived version of the story, however, has been shared on Facebook 10,000 times according to CrowdTangle analytics data.

So it was a presentation by one person who was then cited in a student-run newsletter that then retracted the article.

They refuse to admit that this one person was wrong.

[Newbie]

1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said:

It's important to know where idiots like Newbie/Troll got this lie from.

Flawed Analysis Leads to False Claim of ‘No Excess Deaths’ in 2020

The viral claim about “no excess deaths” — which has been amplified by unreliable websites and disseminated on Facebook and Twitter — stems from an online presentation by an economics lecturer at Johns Hopkins. But it’s flawed for multiple reasons, experts say.

In a Nov. 13 webinar, Genevieve Briand, the assistant director for the university’s Applied Economics master’s program, looked at select CDC data, such as weekly reported deaths, to reach the faulty conclusion that there is “no evidence that COVID-19 create[d] any excess deaths.”

Her claims were then relayed in a story in the Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a student-run publication, which said the analysis showed COVID-19 “has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.” The publication later retracted the report. An archived version of the story, however, has been shared on Facebook 10,000 times according to CrowdTangle analytics data.

So it was a presentation by one person who was then cited in a student-run newsletter that then retracted the article.

They refuse to admit that this one person was wrong.

Yes important to understand where your story is coming from. 👍

mine is straight from Hopkins , since censored yet entirely correct in its assessment.  But of course your fact check (did you figure out which ones are Chinese owned yet 👍) does nothing to disprove except claim they know better than Hopkins🤣

flinch flinch

🍿

PS  who owns your alphabet 🤓

[Newbie]

1 hour ago, Atticus Finch said:

They are subtracting the total deaths at this point in a normal year from the total deaths so far in 2020.

If you can't understand that then You’re  an incomprehensible retard.

And your reference doesn’t even have the total from last year 🤣 as we’re still waiting to see 👀 if that needs adjustments 👍 

Oh yes and if you can’t understand this, you can always make fun of retards 👌

🍿

Flinch 💩

[DBP66]

13 minutes ago, GardenStateBaller said:

#scamdemic #plannedemic 

....^^#DUMBdemic...🤡

[BUFORDGAWOLVES]

On 12/11/2020 at 3:48 PM, Atticus Finch said:

They are subtracting the total deaths at this point in a normal year from the total deaths so far in 2020.

If you can't understand that then you're an incomprehensible developmentally delayed idiot.

Developmentally delayed 

bgw