imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 If I do get sued I’ll just use my super power @Ga96 doesn’t know about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 6 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said: All I know is my internet is down so I can’t do my zoom court via the internet, so they gonna have to drive all the way up to extradite my ass , @TheMaximumHornetSting will get subpoena way before my ass I said it once before I aint getting shit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 1 minute ago, CODBEARD said: ALCU got out back though.. https://www.aclu.org/issues/free-speech/internet-speech/online-anonymity-and-identity "The right to remain anonymous is a fundamental component of our right to free speech, and it applies every bit as much in the digital world as it does in the physical one. In the words of the U.S. Supreme Court in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, “Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority.” Yeah, good luck with that. I went and read the law that the attorneys quoted when sending us that paperwork for our good friend Ga96, and that law does pretty much compell a site to hand over whatever they have pertaining to log in information and any other info populated in our files on that member. I didn't see the site report system as having been a proper service so I cleared the reports and hid the content that was reported. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: I said it once before I aint getting shit... STAY TUNED #itsHappining #BestHasYetToCome 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, imaGoodBoyNow said: STAY TUNED #itsHappining #BestHasYetToCome You and the courts can go fuck yourselves 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, CODBEARD said: Still would need a court order.. Just because they site a Law doesn't give them the power they have to use the Law to get a court order.. I know. I said once they legally serve the paperwork we'd be compelled to release the info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbiafan Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 hours ago, Sweetlarry said: Being a former MSFB coach you actually do hear a lot of stuff, but about your own program. I realize lowends and valdosta are kissing cousins, but I doubt the incest leaks to the msfb for the other program level. Then again Mayberry isn’t a metroplii, so he may have heard something second hand. But as far a being a direct source goes, nah. 96 isn’t hanging out with rod, nub or rush. Of course because none of those 3 would want or care to talk to him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 14 minutes ago, HawgGoneIt said: I know. I said once they legally serve the paperwork we'd be compelled to release the info. I still think we should go with safe over sorry method... Delete this and don't post anymore Rush stuff unless there's evidence or better... Until it's over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 6 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: I still think we should go with safe over sorry method... Delete this and don't post anymore Rush stuff unless there's evidence or better... Until it's over It’s to late dude, better lawyer up, put down a decent retainer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ga96 Posted March 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 Hell gsb got away Scot free after all his "posting". Im just reposting what has been said/posted by others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Citizen Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 58 minutes ago, TheMaximumHornetSting said: I still think we should go with safe over sorry method... Delete this and don't post anymore Rush stuff unless there's evidence or better... Until it's over You're a smart man. Not many around. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ga96 Posted March 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 People thinking too heavily. What some of you are suggesting the govt would have to get involved and investigate every single high school organization in the country. Fact of the matter is rush tapes have 0 to do with the lawsuit and Ga is an at will state. They don't have to have a reason not to renew rod. What gets lost in this they allowed him to stay on as a teacher but he chose not to remain at Valdosta. All those blowout losses is enough to get tossed at Valdosta especially when they come at the hands of rivals. Rogers in moultrie has about 2-3 more years of not getting it done in the playoffs before he is gone. Nub is just the disgruntled ex gf that wants to get her last words in after getting the boot. People go at rush about money but what kind of man is rod that you have to tell him not to buy beer on the school debit card? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaximumHornetSting Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 26 minutes ago, CODBEARD said: Never give in to tyranny.. unless you skeert I only fear 3 things: GOD Spiders And the IRS... Too say I'm scared of the law would be BS... But the Law ain't my friend and I'd rather not come to blows right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 This isn’t my first rodeo, I knew this day was coming, there fore I registered under John Doe and burner email address on here, what is GHSaa and fbi gonna do ? Look up my IP address? Shit for all I know my mother wrote all that shit not me 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetlarry Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 52 minutes ago, Ga96 said: People thinking too heavily. What some of you are suggesting the govt would have to get involved and investigate every single high school organization in the country. Fact of the matter is rush tapes have 0 to do with the lawsuit and Ga is an at will state. They don't have to have a reason not to renew rod. What gets lost in this they allowed him to stay on as a teacher but he chose not to remain at Valdosta. All those blowout losses is enough to get tossed at Valdosta especially when they come at the hands of rivals. Rogers in moultrie has about 2-3 more years of not getting it done in the playoffs before he is gone. Nub is just the disgruntled ex gf that wants to get her last words in after getting the boot. People go at rush about money but what kind of man is rod that you have to tell him not to buy beer on the school debit card? It’s been said that had rush not pissed away to b2b titles he’d still be in mole-tree, wheelin’, stealin’ & dealin’! Allegedly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 36 minutes ago, CODBEARD said: exactly... prove I wrote that shit..and who is I? lol 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 hours ago, CODBEARD said: Let's all read the code... I am not sure it applies to internet though.. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure what it pertains to. Certainly does not apply to anyone outside of Georgia.. 2010 Georgia Code Title 9 - CIVIL PRACTICE Chapter 11 - CIVIL PRACTICE ACT E - 5. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY § . 9-11-34 - O.C.G.A. 9-11-34 (2010)9-11-34. Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes; applicability to nonparties; confidentiality(a) Scope. Any party may serve on any other party a request:(1) To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably usable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of subsection (b) of Code Section 9-11-26 and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or(2) To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of subsection (b) of Code Section 9-11-26.(b) Procedure.(1) The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected, either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.(2) The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within 30 days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified. The party submitting the request may move for an order under subsection (a) of Code Section 9-11-37 with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.(c) Applicability to nonparties.(1) This Code section shall also be applicable with respect to discovery against persons, firms, or corporations who are not parties, in which event a copy of the request shall be served upon all parties of record; or, upon notice, the party desiring such discovery may proceed by taking the deposition of the person, firm, or corporation on oral examination or upon written questions under Code Section 9-11-30 or 9-11-31. The nonparty or any party may file an objection as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section. If the party desiring such discovery moves for an order under subsection (a) of Code Section 9-11-37 to compel discovery, he or she shall make a showing of good cause to support his or her motion. The party making a request under this Code section shall, upon request from any other party to the action, make all reasonable efforts to cause all information produced in response to the nonparty request to be made available to all parties. A reasonable document copying charge may be required.(2) This Code section shall also be applicable with respect to discovery against a nonparty who is a practitioner of the healing arts or a hospital or health care facility, including those operated by an agency or bureau of the state or other governmental unit. Where such a request is directed to such a nonparty, a copy of the request shall be served upon the person whose records are sought by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, or, if known, that person's counsel, and upon all other parties of record in compliance with Code Section 9-11-5; where such a request to a nonparty seeks the records of a person who is not a party, a copy of the request shall be served upon the person whose records are sought by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, or, if known, that person's counsel by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, and upon all parties of record in compliance with Code Section 9-11-5; or, upon notice, the party desiring such discovery may proceed by taking the deposition of the person, firm, or corporation on oral examination or upon written questions under Code Section 9-11-30 or 9-11-31. The nonparty, any party, or the person whose records are sought may file an objection with the court in which the action is pending within 20 days of service of the request and shall serve a copy of such objection on the nonparty to whom the request is directed, who shall not furnish the requested materials until further order of the court, and on all other parties to the action. Upon the filing of such objection, the party desiring such discovery may move for an order under subsection (a) of Code Section 9-11-37 to compel discovery and, if he or she shall make a showing of good cause to support his or her motion, discovery shall be allowed. If no objection is filed within 20 days of service of the request, the nonparty to whom the request is directed shall promptly comply therewith.(3) For any discovery requested from a nonparty pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection or a subpoena requesting records from a nonparty pursuant to Code Section 9-11-45, when the nonparty to whom the discovery request is made is not served with an objection and the nonparty produces the requested records, the nonparty shall be immune from regulatory, civil, or criminal liability or damages notwithstanding that the produced documents contained confidential or privileged information.(d) Confidentiality. The provisions of this Code section shall not be deemed to repeal the confidentiality provided by Code Sections 37-3-166 concerning mental illness treatment records, 37-4-125 concerning mental retardation treatment records, 37-7-166 concerning alcohol and drug treatment records, 24-9-40.1 concerning the confidential nature of AIDS information, and 24-9-47 concerning the disclosure of AIDS information; provided, however, that a person's failure to object to the production of documents as set forth in paragraph (2) of subsection (c) of this Code section shall waive any right of recovery for damages as to the nonparty for disclosure of the requested documents. Subsection c and thereafter would be applicable in this particular instance. Prepgridiron.com would be a nonparty in the case, but upon service through the courts be compelled to provide the requested information within 30 days. Whether that information is worth a shit to them or not, they'd get it. Things like IP, email used to register, any biographical information housed here pertaining to that individual or group of individuals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcalnut Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 40 minutes ago, CODBEARD said: fuck them... I think that pertains to information or records stored on a computer or file cabinet not some IP address on some random message board on the net. Besides who serves papers via instant message anyway? Can't even do that through email.. When they figure out where to serve actual papers too then worry.. lol Bullshit attempt to get you to name names.. That’s a typical tactic used to intimidate people into submission. I don’t like bullies so I say fuck-em, come after me. I don’t need a lawyer to defend libel claims, the burdens on them, my response would be prove it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawgGoneIt Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 1 hour ago, CODBEARD said: fuck them... I think that pertains to information or records stored on a computer or file cabinet not some IP address on some random message board on the net. Besides who serves papers via instant message anyway? Can't even do that through email.. When they figure out where to serve actual papers too then worry.. lol Bullshit attempt to get you to name names.. Yeah, I didn't say it wasn't a bullshit attempt. The fact remains they apparently read along and pay attention or have it brought to their attention by others. Like I said... Have at it. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 1 hour ago, CODBEARD said: fuck them... I think that pertains to information or records stored on a computer or file cabinet not some IP address on some random message board on the net. Besides who serves papers via instant message anyway? Can't even do that through email.. When they figure out where to serve actual papers too then worry.. lol Bullshit attempt to get you to name names.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 1 hour ago, Norcalnut said: That’s a typical tactic used to intimidate people into submission. I don’t like bullies so I say fuck-em, come after me. I don’t need a lawyer to defend libel claims, the burdens on them, my response would be prove it. My Lime Sink attorneys (combined with the skill of the North Morven Family Entourage) would prove it..... Rufus>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 I’m over this topic, let me know when the Real Rush Propst tapes Cum out 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcalnut Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 4 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: My Lime Sink attorneys (combined with the skill of the North Morven Family Entourage) would prove it..... Rufus>> Then I would file a motion that said “NO YOU DIDN’T!!” And throw your whole case into a tailspin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus69 Posted March 4, 2021 Report Share Posted March 4, 2021 59 minutes ago, Norcalnut said: Then I would file a motion that said “NO YOU DIDN’T!!” And throw your whole case into a tailspin. You don't know the Lime Sink attorneys...and especially the North Morven Family Entourage. You wouldn't get the chance to..."file a motion". Capische,,,??? Rufus>> 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imaGoodBoyNow Posted March 5, 2021 Report Share Posted March 5, 2021 18 minutes ago, Rufus69 said: You don't know the Lime Sink attorneys...and especially the North Morven Family Entourage. You wouldn't get the chance to..."file a motion". Capische,,,??? Rufus>> @HawgGoneIt I’m choosing this guy to represent my team at trial 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.